期刊文献+

The Systemic Inflammation on Transradial vs Transfemoral Approach for Coronary Angiography in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome <br/>—Does Transradial Coronary Angiography Trigger More Inflammation?

The Systemic Inflammation on Transradial vs Transfemoral Approach for Coronary Angiography in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome <br/>—Does Transradial Coronary Angiography Trigger More Inflammation?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 <strong>Background:</strong> <span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Most of the institutions accept the Transradial Access (TRA) as the first approach for patients undergoing Coronary Angiography (CAG) and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCI). Several studies clearly revealed endothelial injury of coronary arteries triggers inflammatory response. In this study, we aimed to evaluate inflammatory respond to CAG and to compare the inflammatory response of TRA and Transfemoral Access (TFA). </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methods: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In this single-center prospective study 140 consecutive patients presenting with (Chronical Coronary Syndrome) CCS and underwent transradial or transfemoral CAG between December 2017 and December 2018 were included. After exclusions, left 92 patients were divided into two equal groups as TRA and TFA. The primary endpoints were 2nd hour Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">α</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">), 48</span><sup><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">th</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> hour high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(hs-CRP), complication rates, amount of contrast medium, procedure time and fluoroscopy time. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Basal characteristics of TRA and TFA groups were similar. A comparison of variables demonstrated that there was no statistical significance in increase in inflammatory markers (TNF</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">α</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, hs-CRP), complication rates, amount of contrast media and procedure time. In contrast, TRA was associated longer fluoroscopy time and higher X-ray dosage, although statistically insignificant. CAG caused a similar increase in hs-CRP in both groups, insignificantly. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> In contrast to previous studies reporting a higher inflammatory response with TRA, this study demonstrates that inflammatory response caused by CAG is unrelated to access site and similar in TRA and TFA. Longer fluoroscopy time, higher X-ray dosage and longer procedure time in the TRA group indicate the importance of carefully selecting the angiographic route especially in patients with chronic heart failure, chronic renal impairment and malignancy risk. Also, these parameters place importance for physicians own health and woman planning pregnancy</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.</span> <strong>Background:</strong> <span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Most of the institutions accept the Transradial Access (TRA) as the first approach for patients undergoing Coronary Angiography (CAG) and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCI). Several studies clearly revealed endothelial injury of coronary arteries triggers inflammatory response. In this study, we aimed to evaluate inflammatory respond to CAG and to compare the inflammatory response of TRA and Transfemoral Access (TFA). </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methods: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In this single-center prospective study 140 consecutive patients presenting with (Chronical Coronary Syndrome) CCS and underwent transradial or transfemoral CAG between December 2017 and December 2018 were included. After exclusions, left 92 patients were divided into two equal groups as TRA and TFA. The primary endpoints were 2nd hour Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">α</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">), 48</span><sup><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">th</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> hour high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(hs-CRP), complication rates, amount of contrast medium, procedure time and fluoroscopy time. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Basal characteristics of TRA and TFA groups were similar. A comparison of variables demonstrated that there was no statistical significance in increase in inflammatory markers (TNF</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">α</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, hs-CRP), complication rates, amount of contrast media and procedure time. In contrast, TRA was associated longer fluoroscopy time and higher X-ray dosage, although statistically insignificant. CAG caused a similar increase in hs-CRP in both groups, insignificantly. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> In contrast to previous studies reporting a higher inflammatory response with TRA, this study demonstrates that inflammatory response caused by CAG is unrelated to access site and similar in TRA and TFA. Longer fluoroscopy time, higher X-ray dosage and longer procedure time in the TRA group indicate the importance of carefully selecting the angiographic route especially in patients with chronic heart failure, chronic renal impairment and malignancy risk. Also, these parameters place importance for physicians own health and woman planning pregnancy</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.</span>
作者 Ozge Cetinarslan Aysem Kaya Alev Arat Ozkan Ozge Cetinarslan;Aysem Kaya;Alev Arat Ozkan(Private Incirli Ethica Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey;Institute of Cardiology, University of Istanbul, Cerrahpasa, Turkey)
出处 《World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases》 2021年第2期99-105,共7页 心血管病(英文)
关键词 Transradial Coronary Angiography Transfemoral Coronary Angiography INFLAMMATION TNFΑ hs-CRP Transradial Coronary Angiography Transfemoral Coronary Angiography Inflammation TNFα hs-CRP
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献20

  • 1Bertrand OF, Rao SV, Pancholy S, Jolly SS, Rod6s-Cabau J, Larose E, et al. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions: Results of the first international transradial practice survey. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010,3:1022-31.
  • 2Amoroso G, Kiemeneij E Transradial access for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: The next standard of care? Heart 2010,96:1341-4.
  • 3Burzotta F, Trani C, Hamon M, Amoroso G, Kiemeneij F. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions in patients with coronary bypass grafts: Tips and tricks. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008,72:263-72.
  • 4Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: A consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation 2011, 123:2736-47.
  • 5Goldman S, Zadina K, Moritz T, Ovitt T, Sethi G, Copeland JG, et al. Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: Results from a department of veterans affairs cooperative study. J Am Coll Cardio12004,44:2149-56.
  • 6Verheul HA, Moulijn AC, Hondema S, Schouwink M, Dunning AJ. Late results of 200 repeat coronary artery bypass operations. Am J Cardiol 1991 ,67:24-30.
  • 7Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ. Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary stent implantation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993,30:173-8.
  • 8Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemelti K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (rival): A randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011 ,377:1409-20.
  • 9Joyal D, Bertrand OF', Rinfret S, Shimony A, E/senberg MJ. Meta-analysis often trials on the effectiveness of the radial versus the fmoral approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2012,109:813-8,.
  • 10Han H, Zhou Y, Ma H, Liu Y, Shi D, Zhao Y, et al. Satty and feasibility of transradial approach for coronary bypass graft angiography and intervention. Angiology 2012,63:103-8.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部