期刊文献+

Study on Seismic Fragility Analysis for Piping of CEFR

Study on Seismic Fragility Analysis for Piping of CEFR
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This paper introduces the conception of seismic fragility, gives the model of seismic fragility analysis, and places emphasis on discussing quantization process of seismic fragility parameters. Then, establishes 3D model of pipes of Chinese Experimental Fast Reactor (CEFR) accident residual heat removal system, and obtains the stresses which are essential for calculating seismic fragility parameters. Finally, combined with quantitative methods of seismic fragility, calculates the safety factors and uncertainties of CEFR pipeline, and obtains the system seismic fragility parameters: Am = 2.42 g, βr = 0.36, βu = 0.44, HCLPF = 0.65 g. The results show that: the pipeline of CEFR accident residual heat removal system has high seismic capacity. This paper introduces the conception of seismic fragility, gives the model of seismic fragility analysis, and places emphasis on discussing quantization process of seismic fragility parameters. Then, establishes 3D model of pipes of Chinese Experimental Fast Reactor (CEFR) accident residual heat removal system, and obtains the stresses which are essential for calculating seismic fragility parameters. Finally, combined with quantitative methods of seismic fragility, calculates the safety factors and uncertainties of CEFR pipeline, and obtains the system seismic fragility parameters: Am = 2.42 g, βr = 0.36, βu = 0.44, HCLPF = 0.65 g. The results show that: the pipeline of CEFR accident residual heat removal system has high seismic capacity.
机构地区 [
出处 《Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics》 2013年第6期82-88,共7页 应用数学与应用物理(英文)
关键词 SEISMIC FRAGILITY FRAGILITY Parameter CEFR ACCIDENT RESIDUAL Heat Removal System 3D Model Seismic Fragility Fragility Parameter CEFR Accident Residual Heat Removal System 3D Model
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献14

  • 1R. Kassawara, et al. Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment Implementaton Guide [R]. EPRI 1002989, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Palo Alto, California, 2003.
  • 2M. P. Bohn,J. A. Lambright, Severe Accident Risk, An Assessment of Five US Nuelear Power Plants [R]. NUREG-1150, Volumes 1 and 2, 1990.
  • 3Jaek R, et al. Methodlogy for Developing Seismic Fragilities [ R ]. EPRI TR-103959, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Palo Alto,California, 1994.
  • 4J. Hickman, et al. PRA Procedures Guide: A Guide to the Performance of Probabilistic Risk Assessments for Nuclear Power Plants [ S ]. NUREG/CR-2300, American Nuclar Society, Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, and U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissin, 1983.
  • 5R. Kassawara, et al. Seismic Fragility Application Guide [R]. EPRI 1002988, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Palo Alto,California, 2002.
  • 6Jack R, et al. A Methodology for Assessment of Nuclear Power Plant Seismic Margin [R]. EPRI NP- 6041SL, Revision 1, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Palo Alto, california, 1991.
  • 7SQUG. Generic Implementation Procedure ( GIP ) for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Plant Equipment Revision 2 [S]. Corrected, Seismic Qualification utility Group, 1991.
  • 8SQUG. Procedure for Gathering and Validating Earthquake Experience Data, Revision 3[R]. Seismic Qualification Utility Group, 2001.
  • 9R. Kennedy, et al. Evaluation of JNES Equipment Fragility Tests for Use in Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessments for U.S. Nuclear Power Plants [R]. NUREG/CR-7040, 2011.
  • 10M, S. Power, et al. Engineering Characterization of Ground Motion, Task 1: Effects of Characteristics of Free-Field Motion on Structural Response [R ]. NUREG/CR-3805, 1984.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部