摘要
The two principal contributors to the Hubble tension problem are the predictions of the baryonic acoustic oscillation model and the H<sub>0</sub> parameter fit of the “Tip of the Red Giant Branch” collaboration. In this paper, we show that the former is neither necessary nor possible and that the latter yields a value in agreement with the supernovae results when adjustments are made for errors in the peculiar velocity model used to isolate the recession velocities of galaxies. We also make comparisons between the predictions of our new model of cosmology and the curve fits of the standard model. For values of redshift ≤ 1 we find that, with a Hubble constant of H<sub>0</sub> = 73, the two agree almost exactly. We resolve the Hubble constant problem and validate the new model predictions for small redshifts.
The two principal contributors to the Hubble tension problem are the predictions of the baryonic acoustic oscillation model and the H<sub>0</sub> parameter fit of the “Tip of the Red Giant Branch” collaboration. In this paper, we show that the former is neither necessary nor possible and that the latter yields a value in agreement with the supernovae results when adjustments are made for errors in the peculiar velocity model used to isolate the recession velocities of galaxies. We also make comparisons between the predictions of our new model of cosmology and the curve fits of the standard model. For values of redshift ≤ 1 we find that, with a Hubble constant of H<sub>0</sub> = 73, the two agree almost exactly. We resolve the Hubble constant problem and validate the new model predictions for small redshifts.
