期刊文献+

Use of the IRT Model to Validate Test Items from a Technology Assisted Health Coaching Program

Use of the IRT Model to Validate Test Items from a Technology Assisted Health Coaching Program
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Item Response Theory (IRT) models have been extensively used in the field of education to identify link between a response to a test item and underlying latent capability of the test taker. We demonstrate the benefit of using IRT model to analyze health data using data from M. chat program such that statisticians can use the method in lieu of traditional methods including Cronbach’s alpha, discriminant analysis and factor analysis. M. chat is a technology based health coaching program and the baseline survey from the participants in the program includes response in different but correlated domains of diet, social habits, leisure practices, mental health, substance abuse, self-sufficiency and medication adherence. We analyzed baseline data from 416 subjects using IRT models. Our results indicated that responses pertaining to alcohol and substance abuse were the most discriminating items with an average discrimination estimate of approximately 4.99 whereas the least discriminating items were the diet habits, with an average estimate of -0.476. Item Response Theory (IRT) models have been extensively used in the field of education to identify link between a response to a test item and underlying latent capability of the test taker. We demonstrate the benefit of using IRT model to analyze health data using data from M. chat program such that statisticians can use the method in lieu of traditional methods including Cronbach’s alpha, discriminant analysis and factor analysis. M. chat is a technology based health coaching program and the baseline survey from the participants in the program includes response in different but correlated domains of diet, social habits, leisure practices, mental health, substance abuse, self-sufficiency and medication adherence. We analyzed baseline data from 416 subjects using IRT models. Our results indicated that responses pertaining to alcohol and substance abuse were the most discriminating items with an average discrimination estimate of approximately 4.99 whereas the least discriminating items were the diet habits, with an average estimate of -0.476.
出处 《Open Journal of Statistics》 2018年第3期519-532,共14页 统计学期刊(英文)
关键词 IRT M. CHAT PROGRAM HEALTH Coaching IRT M. Chat Program Health Coaching
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1Polit D, Yang F. Measurement and the measurement of change: A primer for health professionals. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins.
  • 2Samejima F. Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika monograph supplement. 1969. 35: 139-139. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/BF02290599.
  • 3Samejima F. Groded response model. Handbook of modern item response theory: Springer; 1997: 85-100.
  • 4Juster FT, Suzman R. An overview of the Health and Retirement Study. Journal of Human Resources. 1995; 30: S7-S56. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/146277.
  • 5Lord FM. Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers; 1980.
  • 6Bock RD. Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories, Psychometrika. 1972; 37(1): 29-51. doi: http://dx.doi, org/10.1007/BF02291411.
  • 7Lord FM. Estimation of latent ability and item parameters when there are omitted responses. Psychornetrika. 1974; 39(2): 247-264. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10,1007/BF02291471.
  • 8Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin. 1990; 107(2): 238-246. doi: http:// dx.doi.org/10. 1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.
  • 9Hu L, Bentler P. Fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecifications. Psychological Methods. 1998; 4:424-453.
  • 10Browne M, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K, Long J, eds. Testing structural equation models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1993:136-162.

共引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部