摘要
The paper suggests that E = mc<sup>2</sup> may be open to misinterpretation and that in this form it is not what Einstein advanced first. It is further suggested to return to the slightly less compact formula E = Kmc<sup>2</sup> where a < K < 1 which has the merit of accounting for the measured ordinary energy density of the cosmos (K = 1/22) and the conjectured missing dark energy density of the universe (K = 21/22) from the view point of economical notation.
The paper suggests that E = mc<sup>2</sup> may be open to misinterpretation and that in this form it is not what Einstein advanced first. It is further suggested to return to the slightly less compact formula E = Kmc<sup>2</sup> where a < K < 1 which has the merit of accounting for the measured ordinary energy density of the cosmos (K = 1/22) and the conjectured missing dark energy density of the universe (K = 21/22) from the view point of economical notation.
作者
A. J. Babchin
M. S. El Naschie
A. J. Babchin;M. S. El Naschie(Alberta Research Council (ARC), Edmonton, Canada;Department of Physics, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt)
