期刊文献+

Determination of the Population Structure of Fig Genotypes from Algeria and Turkey Using Inter Primer Binding Site-Retrotransposon and Simple Sequence Repeat Markers

Determination of the Population Structure of Fig Genotypes from Algeria and Turkey Using Inter Primer Binding Site-Retrotransposon and Simple Sequence Repeat Markers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In order to identify the variation and estimate the genetic diversity among the fig (Ficus carica L.) genotypes collected from Algeria and Turkey, the genetic relationships between 86 genotypes were investigated using 23 inter primer binding sites (iPBS)-retrotransposon and 16 simple sequence repeat (SSR) primers. A total of 63 polymorphic bands for the iPBS-retrotransposon markers and 25 alleles for the SSR markers were identified with an average of 2.7 and 1.6 per primer, respectively. The average value of polymorphism information content (PIC) for the iPBS markers (0.73) was higher than that for the SSR markers (0.69). Applying the neighbor-joining method to the combined iPBS-retrotransposon and SSR data, the fig genotypes were clustered into two groups. The STRUCTURE software was used to determine the population structure. Among the genotypes studied, two populations (K = 2) were identified indicating a low diversity between the Algerian and Turkish varieties. Both types of markers were able to differentiate all the fig genotypes and were efficient in discriminating the closely related genotypes. Our data also showed that as a universal marker, iPBS-retrotransposon is a useful tool for the molecular characterization of fig genotypes. In order to identify the variation and estimate the genetic diversity among the fig (Ficus carica L.) genotypes collected from Algeria and Turkey, the genetic relationships between 86 genotypes were investigated using 23 inter primer binding sites (iPBS)-retrotransposon and 16 simple sequence repeat (SSR) primers. A total of 63 polymorphic bands for the iPBS-retrotransposon markers and 25 alleles for the SSR markers were identified with an average of 2.7 and 1.6 per primer, respectively. The average value of polymorphism information content (PIC) for the iPBS markers (0.73) was higher than that for the SSR markers (0.69). Applying the neighbor-joining method to the combined iPBS-retrotransposon and SSR data, the fig genotypes were clustered into two groups. The STRUCTURE software was used to determine the population structure. Among the genotypes studied, two populations (K = 2) were identified indicating a low diversity between the Algerian and Turkish varieties. Both types of markers were able to differentiate all the fig genotypes and were efficient in discriminating the closely related genotypes. Our data also showed that as a universal marker, iPBS-retrotransposon is a useful tool for the molecular characterization of fig genotypes.
出处 《Agricultural Sciences》 2017年第12期1337-1357,共21页 农业科学(英文)
关键词 FICUS CARICA L. INTER PRIMER Binding Sites-Retrotransposon Simple Sequence Repeat Genetic Diversity Population Structure Ficus carica L. Inter Primer Binding Sites-Retrotransposon Simple Sequence Repeat Genetic Diversity Population Structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献21

  • 1Ben Salah M,Ancilotti M,Loumirem M (1995).Etude pomologique de six variétés de figuier (Ficus carica L.) typique de Beni Kheddache.Plant Genet.Resour.Newslett.104,16-20.
  • 2Chattl K,Salhi-Hannachi A,Mars M,Marrakchi M,Trifi M (2004a).Analyse de la diversite genetique de cultivars tunisiens de figuier (Ficus carica L.) a l'aide de caractères morphologiques.Fruits 59,49-61.
  • 3Chatti K,Salhi-Hannachi A,Mars M,Marrakchi M,Trifi M (2004b).Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relatiunships in Tunisian fig (Ficus carica L.) cultivars mediated by RAPD.Biologia.Tunisie.2,1-4.
  • 4Felsenstein J (1993).Phylogenetic Interference Package (PHYLIP).Version 3.5.Departement of Genetics,University of Washington,Washington,USA.
  • 5Gilbert JE,Lewis RV,Wilkinson MJ,Caligari PDS (1999).Developing an appropriate strategy to assess genetic variability in plant germplasm collections.Theor.Appl.Genet.98,1125-1131.
  • 6Hedfi J,Trifi M,Salhi-Hannachi A,Ould Mohamed Salem A,Marrakchi M (2003).Morphological and isoenzymatic polymorphism in Tunisian fig (Ficus carica L.) collection.Acta Hort.605,319-325.
  • 7Machado CA,Jousselin E,Kjellberg F,Compton SG,Herre EA (2001).Phylogenetic relationships,historical biogeography and character evolution of fig pollinating wasps.Proc.Roy.Soc.Lond.Biol.268,685-694.
  • 8Mars M (2003).Fig (Ficus carica L.) genetic resources and breeding.Acta Hort.605,19-27.
  • 9Mars M,Chebli T,Marrakchi M (1998).Multivariate analysis of fig (Ficus carica L.) germpiasm in southern Tunisia.Acta Hort.480,75-81.
  • 10Nei M,Li WH (1979).Mathematical model for studying genetical variation in terms of restriction endonucleases.Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA 74,5267-5273.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部