期刊文献+

New Pineapple Somaclonal Variants: P3R5 and Dwarf

New Pineapple Somaclonal Variants: P3R5 and Dwarf
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The Food and Agriculture Organization has highlighted pineapple as one of the most important tropical fruits. Since classical pineapple breeding is difficult, biotechnology has emerged as an attractive instrument. We obtained two new pineapple somaclonal variants derived from in vitro culture of cv. Red Spanish Pinar: P3R5 and Dwarf. The AFLP analysis revealed an existing genetic distance. So far 44 phenotype indicators selected due to their relation to a wide range of important agricultural, morphological and physiological processes have been evaluated. P3R5 differed from the donor in 19 variables (19/44;43.18%), while Dwarf varied in 31 indicators (31/44;70.45%). The number of shoots was significantly different among the three plant materials. Dwarf showed two shoots per plant while P3R5 and the donor did not form any shoots. We also observed that water use efficiency, chlorophyll b concentration, total chlorophyll concentration, transpiration rate, chlorophyll a concentration, thickness of leaf photosynthetic parenchyma, fruit mass with crown, content of free phenolics and superoxide dismutase specific activity were also very different among the three plant materials. The Euclidean distances of each somaclonal variant to the donor plant material taking into consideration the genotype (AFLP) and the phenotype evaluations were also calculated. Regarding the genotype information, P3R5 is separated from cv. Red Spanish Pinar by 2.83 units of Euclidean distance, and Dwarf by 3.00 units. However, the phenotype indicators revealed higher differences: 3.74 in P3R5 and 4.71 in Dwarf. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a comprehensive analysis of pineapple somaclonal variants. The Food and Agriculture Organization has highlighted pineapple as one of the most important tropical fruits. Since classical pineapple breeding is difficult, biotechnology has emerged as an attractive instrument. We obtained two new pineapple somaclonal variants derived from in vitro culture of cv. Red Spanish Pinar: P3R5 and Dwarf. The AFLP analysis revealed an existing genetic distance. So far 44 phenotype indicators selected due to their relation to a wide range of important agricultural, morphological and physiological processes have been evaluated. P3R5 differed from the donor in 19 variables (19/44;43.18%), while Dwarf varied in 31 indicators (31/44;70.45%). The number of shoots was significantly different among the three plant materials. Dwarf showed two shoots per plant while P3R5 and the donor did not form any shoots. We also observed that water use efficiency, chlorophyll b concentration, total chlorophyll concentration, transpiration rate, chlorophyll a concentration, thickness of leaf photosynthetic parenchyma, fruit mass with crown, content of free phenolics and superoxide dismutase specific activity were also very different among the three plant materials. The Euclidean distances of each somaclonal variant to the donor plant material taking into consideration the genotype (AFLP) and the phenotype evaluations were also calculated. Regarding the genotype information, P3R5 is separated from cv. Red Spanish Pinar by 2.83 units of Euclidean distance, and Dwarf by 3.00 units. However, the phenotype indicators revealed higher differences: 3.74 in P3R5 and 4.71 in Dwarf. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a comprehensive analysis of pineapple somaclonal variants.
机构地区 不详
出处 《American Journal of Plant Sciences》 2012年第1期1-11,共11页 美国植物学期刊(英文)
关键词 Ananas Comosus (L.) Merr GENOTYPE VARIATION PHENOTYPE VARIATION Ananas Comosus (L.) Merr Genotype Variation Phenotype Variation
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献69

  • 1Baker JT, Allen LH (1993). Contrasting crop species responses to CO2 and temperature, rice, soybean and citrus. Plant Ecol. 104,239-260.
  • 2Barber J (1998). Photosystem two. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1365, 269- 277.
  • 3Bilger W, Bjorkman O (1990). Role of the xanthophyll cycle in photoprotection elucidated by measurements of light-induced abserbance changes, fluorescence and photosynthesis in leaves of Hedera canariensis. Photosynth. Res. 25, 173-185.
  • 4Bonfig KB, Schreiber U, Gabler A, Roitsch T, Berger S (2006). Infection with virulent and avirulent P. syringae strains differentially affects photosynthesis and sink metabolism in Arabidopsis leaves. Planta 225. 1-12.
  • 5Bowes G (1993). Facing the inevitable, plants and increasing atmospheric CO2. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 44, 309-332.
  • 6Campbell AD, Huysamer M, Stotz HU, Greve LC, Labavitch JM (1990), Comparison of ripening processes in intact tomato fruit and excised pericarp discs 1. Plant Physiol. 94, 1582-1589.
  • 7Centritto M, Nascetti P, Petrilli L, Raschi A, Loreto F (2004). Profiles of isoprene emission and photosynthetic parameters in hybrid poplars exposed to free-air CO2 enrichment. Plant Cell Environ. 27, 403-412.
  • 8Chaves MM, Pereira JS (1992). Water stress, CO2 and climate change. J. Exp. Bot. 43, 1131-1139.
  • 9Chaves MM, Pereira JS, Maroco JP, Rodrigues ML, Picardo CPP, Osorio ML et al. (2002). How plants cope with water stress in the field? Photosynthesis and growth. Ann. Bot. 89, 907-916.
  • 10Cornic G (2000). Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture- not by affecting A TP synthesis. Trends Plant Sci. 5, 187-188.

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部