期刊文献+

Application of Wild Yeast (<i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>) Isolates from Palm Wine and Honey in Baking of Cassava/Wheat Composite Bread

Application of Wild Yeast (<i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>) Isolates from Palm Wine and Honey in Baking of Cassava/Wheat Composite Bread
下载PDF
导出
摘要 <span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i></i></span></i></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Saccharomyces</span></i></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>cerevisiae</i></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"></span></i></span></span></i><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (baker’s yeast) and wheat flour are the conventional </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">raw materials used in baking of bread. Wheat flour is preferred due to gluten proteins providing bread elasticity. Interest is shown in using flours from cassava mainly due to economic and health reasons. Cassava does not have gluten protein required for bread elasticity. A different type of yeast would be required to bake bread using cassava flour. We investigated the use of </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">composite (cassava/wheat) flour technology for bread baking. We also isolated yeast strains from palm wine (SPW) and honey (SH) using enriche</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">d media and evaluated their ability to produce acceptable cassava/wheat composite flour bread. Total of six yeast (3 each for palm wine and honey) strains identified as </span></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i></i></span></span></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Saccharomyces</span></i></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>cerevisiae</i></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"></span></i></span></span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> were isolated. Two strains designated SPW and SH were selected and used for bread production. A commercial yeast strain (CY) was used as control. The major interest in this study included aroma, colour, taste, crust/texture, pore size, loaf weight and volume. Yeas</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">t concentration</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">—</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1% - 3%, and flour composite combinations of 90% wheat/10% cassava, 80% wheat/20% cassava, and 70% wheat/30% cassava were studied. The control was 100% wheat flour. Bread made from 90W:10C and 80W:20C compared favourably with bread made from 100% wheat flour. Loaf volumes were: SPW (850 cm</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">), CY (760 cm</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) and SH (570 cm</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">), whilst loaf weights were: 243</span></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">g for SPW, 260</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">g for CY and 298 for SH. Pore size estimations were: SPW loaf porosity (0.765), CY (0.740) and SH (0.655). Yeast concentrations of 2.5% performed best when SPW was used to produce bread from 70W:30C composite loaf. SPW also displayed combined </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">role of gas production, aroma and flavor development in wheat/cassava composite</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> bread. Mean performance of CY, SH and SPW on sensory parameters of bread produced, varied significantly (p < 0.05). Preference for aroma, colour, taste, crust/texture and general acceptability was in the order of SPW > CY > SH.</span></span></span></span> <span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i></i></span></i></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Saccharomyces</span></i></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>cerevisiae</i></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"></span></i></span></span></i><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (baker’s yeast) and wheat flour are the conventional </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">raw materials used in baking of bread. Wheat flour is preferred due to gluten proteins providing bread elasticity. Interest is shown in using flours from cassava mainly due to economic and health reasons. Cassava does not have gluten protein required for bread elasticity. A different type of yeast would be required to bake bread using cassava flour. We investigated the use of </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">composite (cassava/wheat) flour technology for bread baking. We also isolated yeast strains from palm wine (SPW) and honey (SH) using enriche</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">d media and evaluated their ability to produce acceptable cassava/wheat composite flour bread. Total of six yeast (3 each for palm wine and honey) strains identified as </span></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i></i></span></span></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Saccharomyces</span></i></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>cerevisiae</i></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"></span></i></span></span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> were isolated. Two strains designated SPW and SH were selected and used for bread production. A commercial yeast strain (CY) was used as control. The major interest in this study included aroma, colour, taste, crust/texture, pore size, loaf weight and volume. Yeas</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">t concentration</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">—</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1% - 3%, and flour composite combinations of 90% wheat/10% cassava, 80% wheat/20% cassava, and 70% wheat/30% cassava were studied. The control was 100% wheat flour. Bread made from 90W:10C and 80W:20C compared favourably with bread made from 100% wheat flour. Loaf volumes were: SPW (850 cm</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">), CY (760 cm</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) and SH (570 cm</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">), whilst loaf weights were: 243</span></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">g for SPW, 260</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">g for CY and 298 for SH. Pore size estimations were: SPW loaf porosity (0.765), CY (0.740) and SH (0.655). Yeast concentrations of 2.5% performed best when SPW was used to produce bread from 70W:30C composite loaf. SPW also displayed combined </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">role of gas production, aroma and flavor development in wheat/cassava composite</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> bread. Mean performance of CY, SH and SPW on sensory parameters of bread produced, varied significantly (p < 0.05). Preference for aroma, colour, taste, crust/texture and general acceptability was in the order of SPW > CY > SH.</span></span></span></span>
作者 James Bitrus Onyetugo C. Amadi Tochukwu N. Nwagu Chukwudi I. Nnamchi Anene N. Moneke James Bitrus;Onyetugo C. Amadi;Tochukwu N. Nwagu;Chukwudi I. Nnamchi;Anene N. Moneke(Bioprocess and Fermentation Unit, Department of Microbiology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria)
出处 《Food and Nutrition Sciences》 2020年第7期695-711,共17页 食品与营养科学(英文)
关键词 <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> CASSAVA WHEAT Aroma FLAVOUR <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> Cassava Wheat Aroma Flavour
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部