期刊文献+

Development of an Enteric Bacterial Enrichment Broth and Its Performance for Isolation of Clinically Significant Bacterial Pathogens from Stool

Development of an Enteric Bacterial Enrichment Broth and Its Performance for Isolation of Clinically Significant Bacterial Pathogens from Stool
下载PDF
导出
摘要 <b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Background:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Early detection and accurate identification of foodborne pathogen outbreaks is an important public health function. Increased clinical adoption of multiplex PCR assays or culture</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">independent diagnostic tests (CIDT) correlates to more stool specimens</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">sent to public health laboratories (PHL) for characterization. Isolation and confirmation of enteric bacterial </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">pathogens can prove difficult to consistently recover. The purpose of this study</span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">was to evaluate </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">performance of a broad-use laboratory developed enrichment </span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">broth for isolation of </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Campylobacter</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Salmonella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Shigella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Yersinia</span></i> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">strains from stool specimens. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methods:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> The study compared differences in positivity rates among media and enrichment combinations at specific time </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">points. Comparison of direct inoculation (DI)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> enrichment using a</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> lab-developed Enteric Bacterial Enrichment (EBE) broth and gold-standard isolation methods w</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ere</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> conducted to test current utility of this established practice with stool specimens heat injured and non-injured. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> A total of 234 spiked stool samples, 175 non-injured and 59 heat injured, were tested with</span><b> </b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">varying</span><b> </b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">bacterial concentrations. For non-injured stools, direct inoculation performed better for </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Campylobacter</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Yersinia</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> than enrichment. Conversely, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Salmonella</span></i><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Shigella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> recovery and limit of detection increased with</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> enrichment. </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Campylobacter</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> had the highest percent recovery while </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Shigella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> being the lowest from direct plating at 6-hour and 24-hour enrichment periods. Among broths, EBE performed the best for </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Yersinia</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and similar to Selenite broth for </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Salmonella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Shigella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. Generally, heat injured stool had a significantly lower percent of recovery than non-heat injured with a higher limit of detection across organisms. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Our data suggest there is </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">an </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">only utility for targeted enrichment of CIDT positive </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Salmonella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> stool specimens. We highlight the difficulties of formulating an enrichment broth capable of supporting a variety of enteric pathogens with standardized incubation. Increasing demands on PHL infrastructure warrant further examination of enhancing organism isolation and cost analyses for CIDT positive specimens.</span></span> <b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Background:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Early detection and accurate identification of foodborne pathogen outbreaks is an important public health function. Increased clinical adoption of multiplex PCR assays or culture</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">independent diagnostic tests (CIDT) correlates to more stool specimens</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">sent to public health laboratories (PHL) for characterization. Isolation and confirmation of enteric bacterial </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">pathogens can prove difficult to consistently recover. The purpose of this study</span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">was to evaluate </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">performance of a broad-use laboratory developed enrichment </span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">broth for isolation of </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Campylobacter</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Salmonella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Shigella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Yersinia</span></i> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">strains from stool specimens. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methods:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> The study compared differences in positivity rates among media and enrichment combinations at specific time </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">points. Comparison of direct inoculation (DI)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> enrichment using a</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> lab-developed Enteric Bacterial Enrichment (EBE) broth and gold-standard isolation methods w</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ere</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> conducted to test current utility of this established practice with stool specimens heat injured and non-injured. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> A total of 234 spiked stool samples, 175 non-injured and 59 heat injured, were tested with</span><b> </b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">varying</span><b> </b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">bacterial concentrations. For non-injured stools, direct inoculation performed better for </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Campylobacter</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Yersinia</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> than enrichment. Conversely, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Salmonella</span></i><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Shigella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> recovery and limit of detection increased with</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> enrichment. </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Campylobacter</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> had the highest percent recovery while </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Shigella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> being the lowest from direct plating at 6-hour and 24-hour enrichment periods. Among broths, EBE performed the best for </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Yersinia</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and similar to Selenite broth for </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Salmonella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Shigella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. Generally, heat injured stool had a significantly lower percent of recovery than non-heat injured with a higher limit of detection across organisms. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Our data suggest there is </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">an </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">only utility for targeted enrichment of CIDT positive </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Salmonella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> stool specimens. We highlight the difficulties of formulating an enrichment broth capable of supporting a variety of enteric pathogens with standardized incubation. Increasing demands on PHL infrastructure warrant further examination of enhancing organism isolation and cost analyses for CIDT positive specimens.</span></span>
作者 Timothy S. Horseman Michael B. Lustik Keith S. K. Fong Timothy S. Horseman;Michael B. Lustik;Keith S. K. Fong(Department of Clinical Investigation, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, USA)
出处 《Open Journal of Medical Microbiology》 2021年第1期1-17,共17页 医学微生物学(英文)
关键词 Enteric Bacteria ENRICHMENT STOOL Selective Agar Enteric Bacteria Enrichment Stool Selective Agar
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部