期刊文献+

Effect of Heavy Metal Contamination on Soil Enzymes Activities

Effect of Heavy Metal Contamination on Soil Enzymes Activities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Several enzymes catalyze much of the processes that exist in the soil. Enzymes in polluted soils are usually less active due to their exposure to heavy metals. The main goal of this study was to see how bioavailable types of Cd affected the behavior of catalase, urease, and dehydrogenases, as well as to compare the findings from naturally and artificially polluted samples. An experiment was conducted on two types of farmland (garden) soil: natural soil and soil that had been chemically polluted with Cd. The total content of heavy metal graded these soils as very highly polluted with Cd. The experiment was repeated four times to test the effects of increasing concentration and days (time). Extracellular enzymes from farmland performed enzymatic activity tests that lasted 6 to 29 days after soil sampling. After 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 45 days of incubation, soil samples were taken for testing respectively. However, even though no nutrient was added, dehydrogenase and urease activity increased as Cd concentration increased from 0 to 5 mg/L as the days passed. This is a result of enzymes engaging in respiratory and other living activities because of the low cadmium concentration and respiratory soil properties. However, there were significant variations in enzyme activity between naturally polluted and artificially contaminated soils. Dehydrogenases, Urease, and Catalase all showed a common pattern of enzyme sensitivity, which could be ordered as Dehydrogenase > Urease > Catalase. Dehydrogenase enzyme activity has been discovered to be more Cd resistant. Several enzymes catalyze much of the processes that exist in the soil. Enzymes in polluted soils are usually less active due to their exposure to heavy metals. The main goal of this study was to see how bioavailable types of Cd affected the behavior of catalase, urease, and dehydrogenases, as well as to compare the findings from naturally and artificially polluted samples. An experiment was conducted on two types of farmland (garden) soil: natural soil and soil that had been chemically polluted with Cd. The total content of heavy metal graded these soils as very highly polluted with Cd. The experiment was repeated four times to test the effects of increasing concentration and days (time). Extracellular enzymes from farmland performed enzymatic activity tests that lasted 6 to 29 days after soil sampling. After 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 45 days of incubation, soil samples were taken for testing respectively. However, even though no nutrient was added, dehydrogenase and urease activity increased as Cd concentration increased from 0 to 5 mg/L as the days passed. This is a result of enzymes engaging in respiratory and other living activities because of the low cadmium concentration and respiratory soil properties. However, there were significant variations in enzyme activity between naturally polluted and artificially contaminated soils. Dehydrogenases, Urease, and Catalase all showed a common pattern of enzyme sensitivity, which could be ordered as Dehydrogenase > Urease > Catalase. Dehydrogenase enzyme activity has been discovered to be more Cd resistant.
作者 Justice Ofori Yeboah Guangyu Shi Weilin Shi Justice Ofori Yeboah;Guangyu Shi;Weilin Shi(Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, China)
出处 《Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection》 2021年第6期135-154,共20页 地球科学和环境保护期刊(英文)
关键词 Enzyme Activity DEHYDROGENASES CATALASE UREASE Soil Contamination Heavy Metal Enzyme Activity Dehydrogenases Catalase Urease Soil Contamination Heavy Metal
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献30

  • 1蔡晓布,盖京苹,钱成,冯固.西藏高原天然长芒草地丛枝菌根真菌接种效应[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(11):2121-2126. 被引量:12
  • 2Chen S K,Subler S,Edwards C A.Effects of agricultural bios-timulants on soil microbial activity and nitrogen dynamics[J].Appl.Soil Ecol.,2002,19(3):249-259.
  • 3Cordier C,Alabouvette C.Effectsof the introduction of a biocon-trol strain of Trichoderma atroviride on non target soil micro-or-ganisms[J].Eur.J.Soil Biol.,2009,45(3):267-274.
  • 4Andersona C R,Condrona L M,Cloughb T J et al.Biocharinduced soil microbial community change:Implications for bioge-ochemical cycling of carbon,nitrogen and phosphorus[J].Pedobiologia,2011,54(5-6):309-320.
  • 5Vessey J K.Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers[J].Plant Soil,2003,255(2):571-586.
  • 6OrosD,Pavlecic M,Santek B,Novak S.Cultivation of the bacte-rium Azotobacter chroococcum for preparation of biofertilizers[J].Afr.J.Biotechnol.,2011,10(16):3104-3111.
  • 7Bahrani A,Pourreza J,Hagh J M.Response of winter wheat to co-inoculation with Azotobacter and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi(AMF)under different sources of nitrogen fertilizer[J].Am.-Eur.J.Agric.Environ.Sci.,2010,8(1):95-103.
  • 8Kizilkaya R.Yield response and nitrogen concentrations of springwheat(Triticum aestivum)inoculated with Azotobacter chroococcumstrains[J].Ecol.Eng.,2008,33(2):150-156.
  • 9Mishra A,Shekhar Nautiyal C.Functional diversity of the micro-bial community in the rhizosphere of chickpea grown in diesel fuel-spikedsoil amended with Trichoderma ressei using sole-carbon-source utilization profiles[J].World J.Microbiol.Biotechnol.,2009,25(7):1175-1180.
  • 10Lupwayi N Z,Clayton G W,O'Donovan JT,Grant C A.Soil mi-crobial response to nitrogen rate and placement and barley seedingrate under no till[J].Agron.J.,2011,103(4):1064-1071.

共引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部