摘要
This study assesses radiation levels in soil, water and air in the Norochcholai,<span> </span><span>an area in Sri Lanka closest to the Kundankulam nuclear power plant, India which is situated in the North Western coast. This is important for monitoring radiation hazards </span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">and</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> will be useful in case of a nuclear accident. Superficial soil and water samples from 23 locations were analyzed by Gamma spectrometry using<span style="color:red;"> </span>HPGe detector. The activity concentrations of Th232, K40, Ra226 and Pb210 in the soil were 56.0</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq<span style="white-space:normal;">·</span>kg</span></span></span><span><span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-size:10px;">-</span>1</span></sup></span></span></span></span><span></span><span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">, 96.0</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq</span></span></span>·<span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">kg</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">-</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">, 24.0</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq<span style="white-space:normal;">·</span>kg</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">-</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> and 27.0</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq<span style="white-space:normal;">·</span>kg</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">-</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> respectively. Dose rate at 1</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">m height w</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">as</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> recorded using a survey meter</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">(Automess 6150AD). Median dose rate was 0.098</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">μSv<span style="white-space:normal;">·</span>h</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">-</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">. The median gamma ray absorbed dose rate w</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">as</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> 51.2 nGy<span style="white-space:normal;">·</span>h</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">-</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">,</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> which is lower than the global average of 57 nGy<span style="white-space:normal;">·</span>h</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">-</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">. Radium equivalent activity</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">(Raeq) ranged from 30.3</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq/Kg -</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">458.3</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq/Kg and only one sample recorded the Raeq ></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">370</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq/Kg as safe to be used in building materials. External hazardous indices of all the samples w</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">ere</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> below 1 a</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">nd the mean annual effective dose was within the safe limit of 1</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">mSv/y. The health risk of exposure to terrestrial radiation from the soil in the area is minimal. These data could be used as baseline for radiation assessment.</span></span></span>
This study assesses radiation levels in soil, water and air in the Norochcholai,<span> </span><span>an area in Sri Lanka closest to the Kundankulam nuclear power plant, India which is situated in the North Western coast. This is important for monitoring radiation hazards </span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">and</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> will be useful in case of a nuclear accident. Superficial soil and water samples from 23 locations were analyzed by Gamma spectrometry using<span style="color:red;"> </span>HPGe detector. The activity concentrations of Th232, K40, Ra226 and Pb210 in the soil were 56.0</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq<span style="white-space:normal;">·</span>kg</span></span></span><span><span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-size:10px;">-</span>1</span></sup></span></span></span></span><span></span><span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">, 96.0</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq</span></span></span>·<span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">kg</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">-</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">, 24.0</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq<span style="white-space:normal;">·</span>kg</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">-</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> and 27.0</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq<span style="white-space:normal;">·</span>kg</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">-</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> respectively. Dose rate at 1</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">m height w</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">as</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> recorded using a survey meter</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">(Automess 6150AD). Median dose rate was 0.098</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">μSv<span style="white-space:normal;">·</span>h</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">-</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">. The median gamma ray absorbed dose rate w</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">as</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> 51.2 nGy<span style="white-space:normal;">·</span>h</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">-</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">,</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> which is lower than the global average of 57 nGy<span style="white-space:normal;">·</span>h</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">-</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">. Radium equivalent activity</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">(Raeq) ranged from 30.3</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq/Kg -</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">458.3</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq/Kg and only one sample recorded the Raeq ></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">370</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq/Kg as safe to be used in building materials. External hazardous indices of all the samples w</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">ere</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> below 1 a</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">nd the mean annual effective dose was within the safe limit of 1</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">mSv/y. The health risk of exposure to terrestrial radiation from the soil in the area is minimal. These data could be used as baseline for radiation assessment.</span></span></span>