期刊文献+

Assessment of Background Radiation and Associated Dose Rates in Soil Samples from Norochcholai in the North Western Coast of Sri Lanka

Assessment of Background Radiation and Associated Dose Rates in Soil Samples from Norochcholai in the North Western Coast of Sri Lanka
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This study assesses radiation levels in soil, water and air in the Norochcholai,<span> </span><span>an area in Sri Lanka closest to the Kundankulam nuclear power plant, India which is situated in the North Western coast. This is important for monitoring radiation hazards </span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">and</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> will be useful in case of a nuclear accident. Superficial soil and water samples from 23 locations were analyzed by Gamma spectrometry using<span style="color:red;"> </span>HPGe detector. The activity concentrations of Th232, K40, Ra226 and Pb210 in the soil were 56.0</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq<span style="white-space:normal;">&#183;</span>kg</span></span></span><span><span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-size:10px;">&#45;</span>1</span></sup></span></span></span></span><span></span><span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">, 96.0</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq</span></span></span>&#183;<span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">kg</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">&#45;</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">, 24.0</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq<span style="white-space:normal;">&#183;</span>kg</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">&#45;</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> and 27.0</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq<span style="white-space:normal;">&#183;</span>kg</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">&#45;</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> respectively. Dose rate at 1</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">m height w</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">as</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> recorded using a survey meter</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">(Automess 6150AD). Median dose rate was 0.098</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">μSv<span style="white-space:normal;">&#183;</span>h</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">&#45;</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">. The median gamma ray absorbed dose rate w</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">as</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> 51.2 nGy<span style="white-space:normal;">&#183;</span>h</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">&#45;</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">,</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> which is lower than the global average of 57 nGy<span style="white-space:normal;">&#183;</span>h</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">&#45;</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">. Radium equivalent activity</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">(Raeq) ranged from 30.3</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq/Kg -</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">458.3</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq/Kg and only one sample recorded the Raeq ></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">370</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq/Kg as safe to be used in building materials. External hazardous indices of all the samples w</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">ere</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> below 1 a</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">nd the mean annual effective dose was within the safe limit of 1</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">mSv/y. The health risk of exposure to terrestrial radiation from the soil in the area is minimal. These data could be used as baseline for radiation assessment.</span></span></span> This study assesses radiation levels in soil, water and air in the Norochcholai,<span> </span><span>an area in Sri Lanka closest to the Kundankulam nuclear power plant, India which is situated in the North Western coast. This is important for monitoring radiation hazards </span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">and</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> will be useful in case of a nuclear accident. Superficial soil and water samples from 23 locations were analyzed by Gamma spectrometry using<span style="color:red;"> </span>HPGe detector. The activity concentrations of Th232, K40, Ra226 and Pb210 in the soil were 56.0</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq<span style="white-space:normal;">&#183;</span>kg</span></span></span><span><span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-size:10px;">&#45;</span>1</span></sup></span></span></span></span><span></span><span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">, 96.0</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq</span></span></span>&#183;<span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">kg</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">&#45;</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">, 24.0</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq<span style="white-space:normal;">&#183;</span>kg</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">&#45;</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> and 27.0</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq<span style="white-space:normal;">&#183;</span>kg</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">&#45;</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> respectively. Dose rate at 1</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">m height w</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">as</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> recorded using a survey meter</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">(Automess 6150AD). Median dose rate was 0.098</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">μSv<span style="white-space:normal;">&#183;</span>h</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">&#45;</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">. The median gamma ray absorbed dose rate w</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">as</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> 51.2 nGy<span style="white-space:normal;">&#183;</span>h</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">&#45;</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">,</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> which is lower than the global average of 57 nGy<span style="white-space:normal;">&#183;</span>h</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">&#45;</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">. Radium equivalent activity</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">(Raeq) ranged from 30.3</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq/Kg -</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">458.3</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq/Kg and only one sample recorded the Raeq ></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">370</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq/Kg as safe to be used in building materials. External hazardous indices of all the samples w</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">ere</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> below 1 a</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">nd the mean annual effective dose was within the safe limit of 1</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">mSv/y. The health risk of exposure to terrestrial radiation from the soil in the area is minimal. These data could be used as baseline for radiation assessment.</span></span></span>
作者 Thiwanka Weerakkody Senani Williams Tania Warnakulasuriya Shakila Priyadarshanee Thilaka Attanayaka Indrani Dissanayake Vajira Waduge Rajitha Wickremasinghe Thiwanka Weerakkody;Senani Williams;Tania Warnakulasuriya;Shakila Priyadarshanee;Thilaka Attanayaka;Indrani Dissanayake;Vajira Waduge;Rajitha Wickremasinghe(Sri Lanka Atomic Energy Board, Wellampitiya, Sri Lanka;Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka)
出处 《Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection》 2022年第1期189-206,共18页 地球科学和环境保护期刊(英文)
关键词 Background Radiation Gamma Spectrometry Norochcholai Health Risk Radiological Indices Background Radiation Gamma Spectrometry Norochcholai Health Risk Radiological Indices
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部