期刊文献+

Remediation Effects of Different Concentration of Nano-Hydroxyapatite Level on Pb-Contaminated Soil

Remediation Effects of Different Concentration of Nano-Hydroxyapatite Level on Pb-Contaminated Soil
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Phosphorus-containing amendments can reduce the mobility of Pb in soil. Hydroxyapatite (HAP) is one of the most commonly used phosphorus-containing amendments. With the development of nanotechnology, nano-hydroxyapatie (n-HAP) was gradually applied to remediate soil polluted by heavy metals. Considering the concentrations of HAP/n-HAP were not more than 5% in most studies, soil polluted by Pb was artificially prepared and three different concentrations of n-HAP: 5%, 7% and 10% by weight, were added into the Pb-polluted soil separately. The mixtures of soil and n-HAP were incubated for 180 d and sampled regularly. The bioaccessibility of Pb in soil was determined using simulated gastric juices of two in-vitro digestion tests: USPM (United States Pharmacopeia Methodology) and PBET (Physiologically-Based Extraction Test). The results showed that the immobilizing efficiency of 5% n-HAP to Pb in soil was the highest in PBET. The extractable Pb from soil by USPM was not affected by concentration of n-HAP. So, the least concentration of n-HAP, i.e. 5% n-HAP treatment, was the most cost-effective in USPM. Soil pH increased with concentration of n-HAP. However concentration of n-HAP had little effects on content of soil OM. According to regression analysis, more than 50% differences of the extractable Pb from soil by PBET can be explained by soil pH, while soil pH, organic matter content and incubation time together explained nearly 85% differences of extractable Pb from soil by USPM. Phosphorus-containing amendments can reduce the mobility of Pb in soil. Hydroxyapatite (HAP) is one of the most commonly used phosphorus-containing amendments. With the development of nanotechnology, nano-hydroxyapatie (n-HAP) was gradually applied to remediate soil polluted by heavy metals. Considering the concentrations of HAP/n-HAP were not more than 5% in most studies, soil polluted by Pb was artificially prepared and three different concentrations of n-HAP: 5%, 7% and 10% by weight, were added into the Pb-polluted soil separately. The mixtures of soil and n-HAP were incubated for 180 d and sampled regularly. The bioaccessibility of Pb in soil was determined using simulated gastric juices of two in-vitro digestion tests: USPM (United States Pharmacopeia Methodology) and PBET (Physiologically-Based Extraction Test). The results showed that the immobilizing efficiency of 5% n-HAP to Pb in soil was the highest in PBET. The extractable Pb from soil by USPM was not affected by concentration of n-HAP. So, the least concentration of n-HAP, i.e. 5% n-HAP treatment, was the most cost-effective in USPM. Soil pH increased with concentration of n-HAP. However concentration of n-HAP had little effects on content of soil OM. According to regression analysis, more than 50% differences of the extractable Pb from soil by PBET can be explained by soil pH, while soil pH, organic matter content and incubation time together explained nearly 85% differences of extractable Pb from soil by USPM.
作者 Yi Li Wenqiang Lv Yi Li;Wenqiang Lv(Institution of Environmental Resources and Disaster, School of Geography and Resources, Guizhou Education University, Guiyang, China)
出处 《Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection》 2022年第9期96-108,共13页 地球科学和环境保护期刊(英文)
关键词 Soil Pb N-HAP Remediation of Polluted Soil In Vitro Digestion Test BIOACCESSIBILITY Soil Pb N-HAP Remediation of Polluted Soil In Vitro Digestion Test Bioaccessibility
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部