期刊文献+

Reformed Environmental Impact Assessment in China: An Evaluation of Its Effectiveness

Reformed Environmental Impact Assessment in China: An Evaluation of Its Effectiveness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Since 2015, a “reform storm” of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) opened up in China. This study tries to answer the question of whether these reforms improve the effectiveness of EIA. First, we elaborate on the reforms along with three well-acknowledged components, including EIA legislation, administration, and process. Then, evaluate the reformed EIA system against revised Ahmad and Wood’s criteria. The results demonstrate that the revised laws and regulations are more stringent than the old versions. The EIA process is simplified, and its coordination with the pollutant discharge permit system is promoted. The interim and post-event supervision is currently more robust and the penalties are more severe than before. However, the hierarchical position of the Environmental Protection Law is not high enough and the coordination of different government departments is still challenging. In summary, despite the problems occurring at the initial phase of reforms, the effectiveness of the EIA system has largely been improved. Since 2015, a “reform storm” of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) opened up in China. This study tries to answer the question of whether these reforms improve the effectiveness of EIA. First, we elaborate on the reforms along with three well-acknowledged components, including EIA legislation, administration, and process. Then, evaluate the reformed EIA system against revised Ahmad and Wood’s criteria. The results demonstrate that the revised laws and regulations are more stringent than the old versions. The EIA process is simplified, and its coordination with the pollutant discharge permit system is promoted. The interim and post-event supervision is currently more robust and the penalties are more severe than before. However, the hierarchical position of the Environmental Protection Law is not high enough and the coordination of different government departments is still challenging. In summary, despite the problems occurring at the initial phase of reforms, the effectiveness of the EIA system has largely been improved.
作者 Yang Yang Yang Yang(Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan)
出处 《Journal of Environmental Protection》 2020年第10期889-908,共20页 环境保护(英文)
关键词 Environmental Impact Assessment REFORM EVALUATION EFFECTIVENESS Environmental Impact Assessment Reform Evaluation Effectiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献14

  • 1骆鑫.中美环境影响评价制度比较研究[J].甘肃农业,2005(3):48-49. 被引量:5
  • 2林芳惠,苏祖鹏.中美环境影响评价制度比较[J].中国水土保持,2005(7):14-16. 被引量:8
  • 3[3]John Glasson,Riki Therivel,Andrew Chadwick.Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment.2nd Edition.London:Spon Press,1999,8~14,28~48,55~79.85~92.160~180.
  • 4[4]Christopher Wood.Environmental Assessment.See Chris Miller.Planning and Environmental Protection,Oregon:Hart Publishing Oxford and Portland,2001,152~172.
  • 5[5]全国人大环境与资源保护委员会法案室.中华人民共和国环境影响评价法释义.北京:中国法制出版社,2003,66~68.
  • 6本报记者 聂廷勇 见习记者 阎杰.周生贤调研重庆市环境保护工作[N].中国环境报.2014(001)
  • 7李安.环境污染根在逐利资本.环球时报[EB/OL].(2014-02-25).http://opinion.huanqiu.com/opinion_china/2014-02/4856305.html.
  • 8赵建军.最严格的制度最严密的法治--学习习近平总书记关于生态文明建设的重要论述.光明日报[EB/OL].(2013-12-02).http://epaper.gmw.cn/gmrb/html/2013-12/02/nw.D110000gmrb_20131202-2-02.htm.
  • 9董战峰,李红祥,葛察忠,王金南.生态文明体制改革宏观思路及框架分析[J].环境保护,2015,43(19):15-19. 被引量:17
  • 10李志林,包存宽.中德战略环评公众参与对比分析——基于制度的比较[J].环境影响评价,2016,38(4):29-32. 被引量:4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部