摘要
From Jan</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 2013 to Nov</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 2018, we carried out the investigation on vegetation studies in the ecological monitoring programs, Shenzhen</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> totally researched 170 plant communities of mountain areas etc., </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">few areas of street regions and parks etc., for communities’ structural characteristics and plant diversity. We comparatively analyzed natural forests, semi-natural forest and artificial forest composition and structural characters and family, genus and species diversity level and the main affected factors. We also researched and analyzed these communities’ structural characteristics and pant diversity, </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">comparatively analyzed natural forests, semi-natural forest and artificial forest composition and structural characters and family, genus and species diversity level, the main affected factors;researched and analyzed the relationship between plant community structure characteristics with the absorbing ability to PM</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2.5</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> pollutants. The result showed that the structure and plant diversity of natural </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">forest </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">were </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">obviously better than</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> artificial disturbed forest or artificial forest, the semi-natural forest w</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">as</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> the middle level of the forests, In the indices of height, DBH, coverage and crow width etc. of tree layer, natural forests and semi-natural forests were obvious higher than that of artificial disturbed forest or artificial forest;in some forests of artificial disturbed forest or artificial forest, though their richness indices of family and genus were a slightly higher, but this contribution was majorly due to herb layer plants, and some shrub layer plants. Analyz</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ing</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> three kinds of communities, the number of tree layer species of natural forest was</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> the </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">largest, and their every </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">α</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-diversity index value was </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">highest;these characteristics values of semi-natural forest were second, artificial disturbed forests or artificial forests were </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">lowest;in shrub layer, and herb layer, few </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">α</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-diversity indices of artificial disturbed forest or artificial forest were </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">a slightly higher than that of some natural forests, but the integral values of the diversity indices of natural forest and semi-natural forest were obvious</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ly</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> higher than the former. The research showed that in the artificial disturbed forest or artificial forest, because there have some little scale clearing area</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, so some pioneer plant species could enter the community and formed a temporarily </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">increase of species diversity, however</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> these species major </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">were</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> some shrub and herb plants;but tree layer possessed obvious</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ly</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> more, even surpass</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ed</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> several ten times biomass than shrub and herb layers</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Therefore</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> the respect</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> of maintain ecosystem stability and other</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> ecological efficient have </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">major and dominated position and so on;and then this community can </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">be </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">natural recovery and succession, those forementioned new entire plants shall withdraw from the community and are replaced by the original plants of the community;but this process has already caused the ecological efficient loss and ecosystem unstable. Above research results are better evidence and theory reference to the argument problems on that </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">are</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> natural forest and natural restoration forest biodiversity higher? or is artificial forest biodiversity higher? and or is more artificial disturbed forest higher?</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Our researches showed that used random investigation method set quadrats, and combined typical investigation method, the structural indices in the all layer of community and all diversity indices of tree, shrub and herb layers and the integral values </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">were</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> similar, same or usually these indices in the community which set 600 m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, 800 m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> total quatrat area were higher (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">α</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-diversity) than that of more than 3000 m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, 4000 m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> or 7000 m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, even more than 17,000 m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> total qua</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">d</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">rat area of communities. These lot</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> of researches further proved that according to minimum area method for vegetation survey, in subtropical region, using random investigation method combined with typical investigation set 400 m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> or 400 m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> - 500 m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> total qua</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">d</span><span style="font-family:""><span
From Jan</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 2013 to Nov</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 2018, we carried out the investigation on vegetation studies in the ecological monitoring programs, Shenzhen</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> totally researched 170 plant communities of mountain areas etc., </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">few areas of street regions and parks etc., for communities’ structural characteristics and plant diversity. We comparatively analyzed natural forests, semi-natural forest and artificial forest composition and structural characters and family, genus and species diversity level and the main affected factors. We also researched and analyzed these communities’ structural characteristics and pant diversity, </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">comparatively analyzed natural forests, semi-natural forest and artificial forest composition and structural characters and family, genus and species diversity level, the main affected factors;researched and analyzed the relationship between plant community structure characteristics with the absorbing ability to PM</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2.5</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> pollutants. The result showed that the structure and plant diversity of natural </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">forest </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">were </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">obviously better than</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> artificial disturbed forest or artificial forest, the semi-natural forest w</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">as</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> the middle level of the forests, In the indices of height, DBH, coverage and crow width etc. of tree layer, natural forests and semi-natural forests were obvious higher than that of artificial disturbed forest or artificial forest;in some forests of artificial disturbed forest or artificial forest, though their richness indices of family and genus were a slightly higher, but this contribution was majorly due to herb layer plants, and some shrub layer plants. Analyz</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ing</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> three kinds of communities, the number of tree layer species of natural forest was</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> the </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">largest, and their every </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">α</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-diversity index value was </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">highest;these characteristics values of semi-natural forest were second, artificial disturbed forests or artificial forests were </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">lowest;in shrub layer, and herb layer, few </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">α</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-diversity indices of artificial disturbed forest or artificial forest were </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">a slightly higher than that of some natural forests, but the integral values of the diversity indices of natural forest and semi-natural forest were obvious</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ly</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> higher than the former. The research showed that in the artificial disturbed forest or artificial forest, because there have some little scale clearing area</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, so some pioneer plant species could enter the community and formed a temporarily </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">increase of species diversity, however</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> these species major </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">were</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> some shrub and herb plants;but tree layer possessed obvious</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ly</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> more, even surpass</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ed</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> several ten times biomass than shrub and herb layers</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Therefore</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> the respect</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> of maintain ecosystem stability and other</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> ecological efficient have </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">major and dominated position and so on;and then this community can </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">be </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">natural recovery and succession, those forementioned new entire plants shall withdraw from the community and are replaced by the original plants of the community;but this process has already caused the ecological efficient loss and ecosystem unstable. Above research results are better evidence and theory reference to the argument problems on that </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">are</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> natural forest and natural restoration forest biodiversity higher? or is artificial forest biodiversity higher? and or is more artificial disturbed forest higher?</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Our researches showed that used random investigation method set quadrats, and combined typical investigation method, the structural indices in the all layer of community and all diversity indices of tree, shrub and herb layers and the integral values </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">were</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> similar, same or usually these indices in the community which set 600 m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, 800 m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> total quatrat area were higher (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">α</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-diversity) than that of more than 3000 m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, 4000 m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> or 7000 m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, even more than 17,000 m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> total qua</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">d</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">rat area of communities. These lot</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> of researches further proved that according to minimum area method for vegetation survey, in subtropical region, using random investigation method combined with typical investigation set 400 m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> or 400 m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> - 500 m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> total qua</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">d</span><span style="font-family:""><span
作者
Yuyuan Huang
Xinfan Yu
Hong Liang
Zhiming Yang
Haiyang Wen
Zhen Ye
Yunhe Lu
Ruoyu Wei
Lijun Yang
Song Ma
Kangsai Zhao
Fan Wang
Zhijie Chen
Huina Yang
Chengxi Jiang
Bin Xu
Weimin Wang
Wang Xu
Zhu Ming
Shizhen Lin
Hao Liu
Hualiang Luo
Suni Deng
Lijuan Huang
Yanjun Lei
Xiaoli Wan
Yahe Li
Wanmin Zhou
Shun Zhao
Zhenliang Duan
Dongyao Liao
Xiaobo Qiu
Haoqun Huang
Linlin Jiang
Yuyuan Huang;Xinfan Yu;Hong Liang;Zhiming Yang;Haiyang Wen;Zhen Ye;Yunhe Lu;Ruoyu Wei;Lijun Yang;Song Ma;Kangsai Zhao;Fan Wang;Zhijie Chen;Huina Yang;Chengxi Jiang;Bin Xu;Weimin Wang;Wang Xu;Zhu Ming;Shizhen Lin;Hao Liu;Hualiang Luo;Suni Deng;Lijuan Huang;Yanjun Lei;Xiaoli Wan;Yahe Li;Wanmin Zhou;Shun Zhao;Zhenliang Duan;Dongyao Liao;Xiaobo Qiu;Haoqun Huang;Linlin Jiang(College of Agriculture and Biology, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China;Shenzhen Environmental Monitoring Center, Shenzhen, China;South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Guangzhou, China;Environmental Monitoring Station of Nanshan District, Shenzhen, China;Ecological and Environmental Protection Monitoring Station of Dapeng District, Shenzhen, China;Construction Public Service Bureau of Dapeng New District, Shenzhen, China)