期刊文献+

Comparison of Cloud Type Classification with Split Window Algorithm Based on Different Infrared Band Combinations of Himawari-8 Satellite 被引量:1

Comparison of Cloud Type Classification with Split Window Algorithm Based on Different Infrared Band Combinations of Himawari-8 Satellite
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Cloud detection and classification form a basis in weather analysis. Split window algorithm (SWA) is one of the simple and matured algorithms used to detect and classify water and ice clouds in the atmosphere using satellite data. The recent availability of Himawari-8 data has considerably strengthened the possibility of better cloud classification owing to its enhanced multi-band configuration as well as high temporal resolution. In SWA, cloud classification is attained by considering the spatial distributions of the brightness temperature (BT) and brightness temperature difference (BTD) of thermal infrared bands. In this study, we compare unsupervised classification results of SWA using the band pair of band 13 and 15 (SWA13-15, 10 and 12 μm bands), versus that of band 15 and 16 (SWA15-16, 12 and 13 μm bands) over the Japan area. Different threshold values of BT and BTD are chosen in winter and summer seasons to categorize cloud regions into nine different types. The accuracy of classification is verified by using the cloud-top height information derived from the data of Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO). For this purpose, six different paths of the space-borne lidar are selected in both summer and winter seasons, on the condition that the time span of overpass falls within the time ranges between 01:00 and 05:00 UTC, which corresponds to the local time around noon. The result of verification indicates that the classification based on SWA13-15 can detect more cloud types as compared with that based on SWA15-16 in both summer and winter seasons, though the latter combination is useful for delineating cumulonimbus underneath dense cirrus Cloud detection and classification form a basis in weather analysis. Split window algorithm (SWA) is one of the simple and matured algorithms used to detect and classify water and ice clouds in the atmosphere using satellite data. The recent availability of Himawari-8 data has considerably strengthened the possibility of better cloud classification owing to its enhanced multi-band configuration as well as high temporal resolution. In SWA, cloud classification is attained by considering the spatial distributions of the brightness temperature (BT) and brightness temperature difference (BTD) of thermal infrared bands. In this study, we compare unsupervised classification results of SWA using the band pair of band 13 and 15 (SWA13-15, 10 and 12 μm bands), versus that of band 15 and 16 (SWA15-16, 12 and 13 μm bands) over the Japan area. Different threshold values of BT and BTD are chosen in winter and summer seasons to categorize cloud regions into nine different types. The accuracy of classification is verified by using the cloud-top height information derived from the data of Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO). For this purpose, six different paths of the space-borne lidar are selected in both summer and winter seasons, on the condition that the time span of overpass falls within the time ranges between 01:00 and 05:00 UTC, which corresponds to the local time around noon. The result of verification indicates that the classification based on SWA13-15 can detect more cloud types as compared with that based on SWA15-16 in both summer and winter seasons, though the latter combination is useful for delineating cumulonimbus underneath dense cirrus regions
出处 《Advances in Remote Sensing》 2018年第3期218-234,共17页 遥感技术进展(英文)
关键词 CLOUD Type Detection Himawari-8 SPLIT WINDOW ALGORITHM BRIGHTNESS Temperature Cloud Type Detection Himawari-8 Split Window Algorithm Brightness Temperature
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献30

  • 1杨虎,杨忠东.中国陆地区域陆表温度业务化遥感反演算法及产品运行系统[J].遥感学报,2006,10(4):600-607. 被引量:17
  • 2国家卫星气象中心.FY-3A扫描辐射计(VIRR) L1数据定标方法及相关参数[A]国家卫星气象中心,20091-2.
  • 3Becker F. The impact of spectral emissivity on the measurement of land surface temperature from a satellite[J].International Journal of Remote Sensing,1987,(10):1509-1522.
  • 4Becker F,Li Z L. Towards a local split window method over land surfaces[J].International Journal of Remote Sensing,1990,(03):369-393.
  • 5Berk A,Anderson G P,Acharya P K. MODTRAN4 user's manual,air force research laboratory space vehicles directorate air force materiel command HANSCOM AFB[MA 01731 3010][R].1999.10-35.
  • 6Carson T N,Ripley D A. On the relation between NDVI,fractional vegetation cover,and leaf area index[J].Remote Sensing of Environment,1997,(03):241-252.doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00104-1.
  • 7Czajkowski K P,Goward S N,Ouaidrari H. Impact of AVHRR filter function on surface temperature estimation from the split window approach[J].International Journal of Remote Sensing,1998,(10):2007-2012.
  • 8Kahle A B,Madura D P,Soha J M. Middle infrared multispectral aircraft scanner data:Analysis for geological applications[J].Applied Optics,1980,(14):2279-2290.
  • 9Kneisys F X,Robertson D C,Abreu L W. Appendix A MODTRAN 3 user instructions[A].1995.233-234.
  • 10Korb A R,Dybwad P,Wadsworth W. Portable FTIR spectroradiometer for field measurements of radiance and emis sivity[J].Applied Optics,1996,(10):1679-1692.

共引文献20

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部