期刊文献+

Testing Component-Based Software: What It has to do with Design and Component Selection

Testing Component-Based Software: What It has to do with Design and Component Selection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In a component-based software development life cycle, selection of preexisting components is an important task. Every component that has to be reused has an associated risk of failure of not meeting the functional and non-functional requirements. A component's failure would lead a developer to look for some other alternative of combinations of COTS, in-house and engineered components among possible candidate combinations. This means design itself can readily change. The very process of design of a software system and component selection seems to be heavily dependent on testing results. Instability of design, further, becomes more severe due to requirements change requests. Therefore, this instability of design has to be essentially mitigated by using proper design and testing approaches, otherwise, it may lead to exorbitantly high testing cost due to the repeated testing of various alternatives. How these three activities: Component-based software design, component selection and component-based software testing are interrelated? What process model is most suited to address this concern? This work explores the above questions and their implication in terms of nature of a process model that can be convincing in case of component-based software development. In a component-based software development life cycle, selection of preexisting components is an important task. Every component that has to be reused has an associated risk of failure of not meeting the functional and non-functional requirements. A component's failure would lead a developer to look for some other alternative of combinations of COTS, in-house and engineered components among possible candidate combinations. This means design itself can readily change. The very process of design of a software system and component selection seems to be heavily dependent on testing results. Instability of design, further, becomes more severe due to requirements change requests. Therefore, this instability of design has to be essentially mitigated by using proper design and testing approaches, otherwise, it may lead to exorbitantly high testing cost due to the repeated testing of various alternatives. How these three activities: Component-based software design, component selection and component-based software testing are interrelated? What process model is most suited to address this concern? This work explores the above questions and their implication in terms of nature of a process model that can be convincing in case of component-based software development.
机构地区 不详
出处 《Journal of Software Engineering and Applications》 2011年第1期37-47,共11页 软件工程与应用(英文)
关键词 CBSE (Component-Based SOFTWARE Engineering) SOFTWARE TESTING SOFTWARE Process COTS (Commercial Off-The-Shelf Software) CBSE (Component-Based Software Engineering) Software Testing Software Process COTS (Commercial Off-The-Shelf Software)
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部