摘要
In this paper, a routing protocol for wireless sensor network, baptized energy based protocol (EBP) is proposed. Wireless sensor network presents many challenges and constraints, and one of the major constraints is the routing problem. Due to the limited energy of sensor nodes, routing in this type of network shall perform efficiently to maximize the network lifetime. One of the proposed algorithms is the directional source aware routing protocol (DSAP) which, after simulation, showed a lot of limitations and drawbacks. The modified directional source aware routing protocol (MDSAP) was proposed by the authors of this paper to address some of the DSAP’s limitations but remains limited to a fixed topology, fixed source and stationary nodes. So EBP is proposed and operated under different scenarios and showed, after its simulation using TinyOS, many advantages in terms of load balancing, free looping, minimizing packet error rate and maximizing network lifetime.
In this paper, a routing protocol for wireless sensor network, baptized energy based protocol (EBP) is proposed. Wireless sensor network presents many challenges and constraints, and one of the major constraints is the routing problem. Due to the limited energy of sensor nodes, routing in this type of network shall perform efficiently to maximize the network lifetime. One of the proposed algorithms is the directional source aware routing protocol (DSAP) which, after simulation, showed a lot of limitations and drawbacks. The modified directional source aware routing protocol (MDSAP) was proposed by the authors of this paper to address some of the DSAP’s limitations but remains limited to a fixed topology, fixed source and stationary nodes. So EBP is proposed and operated under different scenarios and showed, after its simulation using TinyOS, many advantages in terms of load balancing, free looping, minimizing packet error rate and maximizing network lifetime.
作者
Samir Haddad
Jinane Sayah
Bachar El-Hassan
Chadi Kallab
Mohamad Chakroun
Nisrine Turkey
Jinan Charafeddine
Hani Hamdan
Samir Haddad;Jinane Sayah;Bachar El-Hassan;Chadi Kallab;Mohamad Chakroun;Nisrine Turkey;Jinan Charafeddine;Hani Hamdan(Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Computer Science and Mathematics, University of Balamand, Koura, Lebanon;Issam Fares Faculty of Technology, Department of Telecom and Networks, University of Balamand, Koura, Lebanon;Faculty of Engineering Branch 1, Department of Electricity and Electronics, Lebanese University, Lebanon;Faculty of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, The University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany;Faculty of Engineering, Notre Dame University, Lebanon;Université Paris-Saclay, Pôle scientifique et technologique de Vélizy, Laboratoire d'Ingénierie des Systèmes de Versailles (LISV EA4048), Vélizy, France;Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, CNRS, Laboratoire des Signaux et Systèmes (L2S UMR CNRS 8506), Gif-sur-Yvette, France)