摘要
在《经济与社会》乙书中，韦伯讨论现代法律随着社会理性化出现之形式性质，并强烈质疑福利国家出现导致之法律的实质化。韦伯此一有关形式法律与实质法律之原创性的分析引发了此後数十年的论战。面对福利国家法律实质化产生之问题，法律社会学家屠布涅亦从系统论之观点，提出反思（身）法之法律形式，企图以之取代实质法律。哈伯马斯则提出程序主义法典范，希望能有效解决其中之论争。本文从哈伯马斯对於韦伯法社会学之诠释、批判与回应为起点，进一步以程序主义法典范为中心，来探讨程序主义与反思（身）法典范之论争。
With the emergence and development of the modern welfare state, classical liberal conceptions of the legal norm have been undermined to a great extent. This trend has provoked a heated debate between sociologists, political scientists and legal scholars. Since publication, Max Weber's famous discussion of antiformal tendencies in modern law, in Economy and Society, has defined the terms of the debate over welfare state law. In response to the problems resulting from the law's materialization, G. Teubner proposes a reflexive law model. J. Habermas offers his proceduralist paradigm of law and hopes it will satisfactorially answer the debates between the liberal, social-welfare and reflexive models. This paper hopes to show that Habermas's paradigm proves to be a creative force while raising some questions.
