摘要
关于中国模式的讨论,一直以来有个误区,即想当然地认为“中国开发模式”已然成功,剩下的任务只是如何归因.笔者并不这么认为.在这里,开发模式的评价指标的选择成为关键.作为赶超模式的典范,东亚模式的特点在于:在开发前期实现了“成长的共享”,以此为基础,在后期实现了政治民主化的和平转型.对照东亚模式,中国模式“高增长、低共享”的特点与东南亚模式相似,而非东亚模式.轨道修正的必要性迫在眉睫.
In the discussion of the Chinese model of development, there is a misconception that the Chinese Model has succeeded and the only task left is to identify the reasons behind it. I disagree with this misguided view and believe that the key to correct this misconception is to clarify the criteria for development. As a successful example of the development models, the East Asian model is that at once the economy has achieved substantial development, the fruit of development is shared in the society. This "shared growth" then served as a foundation for political democratization, which enabled the East Asian countries to complete the transition peacefully.Instead of shared growth, the Chinese model features "high growth and low sharing," which resembles the development model of Southeast Asia, rather than that of East Asia. Therefore, an adjustment is urgently needed.
出处
《复旦政治学评论》
CSSCI
2016年第2期89-118,共30页
Fudan Political Science Review
关键词
中国模式
东亚模式
东南亚模式
中等收入国家陷阱
分配正义
成长的共享
后发劣势
威权主义
Chinese model
East Asian model
the Southeast Asian model
middle income trap
distributive justice
shared growth
curse to the later comer
authoritarianism