“辱母杀人”案件的民间认知——由于欢行为是否构成正当防卫说起

“Insulting Mother Homicide Case”Cognition On Folk Law:Whether Yu Huan’s Behavior Constitutes a Legitimate Defense

一个看似寻常的司法案件(于欢案件)经过媒体的报道,互联网的传播,迅速在全国引起广泛关注.被广泛关注的根本原因不是互联网的发达,而是国家司法的结论(一审判决)与民间认知的错位,极大地刺激了民间观感,惹得理论界和民间不得不“撸起袖子”发表自己的观点看法,以至于关于该案的舆论迅速发酵.对此,聊城市中级人民法院只有招架之势,而无还手之力,最高人民检察院和最高人民法院亦是派员发文,欲抽丝剥茧查明事实、斟酌切磋适用法律、言辞切切引导舆论,从而最终给公众以“说法”.然而,在互联网的场域内,每个人都是自媒体,国家司法裁判欲与民间舆论观点沟通互动,必须在知悉民间法的特点上理解民间认知,才能最终让人民群众在每一个司法案件中感受到公平正义.

A seemingly usual case of justice(Yu Huan case) reported by the media,the spread of the Internet, quickly attracted widespread attention throughout the country. The root cause of widespread concern is not the development of the Internet,but the conclusion of the national judiciary(the judgment of the first instance)and the dislocation of folk cognition, which greatly stimulated the folk perception, caused the theoretical circles and the people to their views,so that the public on the case of rapid fermentation. In this regard,Liao Cheng appeal court only parry the trend, and no strength to fight back,the Supreme Procuratorate and the Supreme Court is also to sent a member to find out the facts, consider the application of law, words to guide public opinion,and ultimately to the public to "statement". However, in the field of the Internet,everyone is We Media,the national judicial decision and civil opinion views and communication,must be aware of the characteristics of folk law to understand folk cognition,in order to finally let the people in every judicial case feel fair and just.