期刊文献+

持续鞘内注射吗啡镇痛对重度癌痛患者的疗效及细胞免疫功能的影响 被引量:6

Effects of continuous intrathecal morphine analgesia on severe cancer pain and cellular immune function in patients with different cancers
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨持续鞘内注射吗啡镇痛对重度癌痛患者的镇痛疗效和细胞免疫功能的影响.方法 重度癌症疼痛患者40例,疼痛评分(NRS)>6,随机分为鞘内组和常规组,每组20例.鞘内组接受皮下药物泵持续鞘内注射吗啡镇痛;常规组接受常规途径吗啡镇痛.于镇痛前(T0)及镇痛后1日(T1)、7日(T2)、15日(T3)及30日(T4)时记录两组患者T淋巴细胞亚群和NK细胞水平及NRS评分;并统计吗啡日均用量及不良反应.结果 T0、T2时,两组患者CD3-、CD4-、CD8-、CD4+/CD8+和NK细胞百分比差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05);T1时,鞘内组CD3-、CD4+、CD4+/CD8+和NK细胞低于常规组(P<0.05);T3、T4时,鞘内组CD3+、CD4+/CD4+/CD8+和NK细胞水平高于常规组(P< 0.05);T4时,鞘内组CD8+值低于常规组(P<0.05).两组患者各时点NRS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);鞘内组患者不良反应发生率低于常规组(P<0.05).结论 持续鞘内注射吗啡镇痛对重度癌痛患者可有效镇痛,并可改善细胞免疫功能,不良反应少. Objective To explore the effects of continuous intrathecal morphine analgesia on severe cancer pain and cellular immune function in patients with different cancers.Methods Forty patients with severe cancer pain,NRS > 6,were randomly divided into two groups,intratbecal group and routine group,20 cases in each group.Patients in intrathecal group were treated with continuous intrathecal morphine analgesia,while routine group with routine morphine analgesia.The counts of T lymphocyte suhsets and NK cells,and NRS were measured before intrathecal injection (T0) and at 1 day(T1),7 days (T2),15 days(T3),and 30 days(T4) after analgesia.The amount of daily morphine,the incidence of adverse reactions were recorded.Results No statistical differences were found in peripheral T lymphocyte subsets(CD3+,CD4+,CD8+,CD4+/CD8+) and NK cell connts between the two groups at T0,T2 (P > 0.05).While the above indicators in intrathecal group were significantly lower than those in routine group at T1 (P< 0.05).The cell percentages of T lymphocyte subsets CD3+,CD4+,CD4+/CD8+and NK cells in intrathecal group were significantly higher than those in routine group at T3 and T4(P< 0.05);while the cell percentage of T lymphocyte subsets CD8-was lower in the intrathecal group at T4 (P < 0.05).There were no statistical differences in N R S between the two groups at each time point (P > 0.05).The incidence of adverse reaction was significantly lower in the intrathecal group than that in routine group (P < 0.05).Conclusion Continuous intrathecal morphine analgesia can effectively relieve the severe cancer pain,improve cell immune function,with less adverse reactions.
出处 《实用疼痛学杂志》 2016年第5期345-349,共5页 Pain Clinic Journal
关键词 注射 脊髓 吗啡 重度癌痛 免疫 细胞 Injection,spinal Morphine Severe cancer pain Immunity,cellular
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献41

  • 1陈惠荣,李军,刘永勤,吕浩,赵海涛.全麻复合硬膜外阻滞对上腹部手术病人应激反应的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(2):95-96. 被引量:79
  • 2Bouhassira D, Lante' ri-Minet M, Attal N, et al. Prevalence of chronic pain with neuropathic char- acteristics in the general population. Pain, 2008, 136 : 380 -387.
  • 3Kori SH, Foley KM, Posner JB. Brachial plexus lesions in patients withcancer: 100 cases. Neurology, 1981,31:45-50.
  • 4Foley KM. Pain assessment and cancer pain syndromes. In : Doyle D, Hanks GW, MacDonald RN, eds. Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine, Second Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998, 310 - 331.
  • 5Zech DF, Grond S, Lynch J, et al. Validation of World Health Organization Guidelines for cancer pain relief: a 10 year prospective study. Pain, 1995,63 : 65 -76.
  • 6Portenoy RK, Lesage P. Management of cancer pain. Lancet, 1999,353:1695 -700.
  • 7Mercadante S, Portenoy RK. Opioid Poorly-Responsive. Cancer Pain. Part 1 : Clinical Consider- ations Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. Vol. 21 No. 2 February 2001 : 144 - 150.
  • 8Miguel R. Interventional treatment of cancer pain: the fourth step in the WHO analgesic ladder? Cancer Control, 2000,7 : 149 - 156.
  • 9Burton AW, Hamid B. Current challenges in cancer pain management: does the WHO ladder ap- proach still Have relevance? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 2007,7 : 1501 - 1502.
  • 10Erdine S. Interventlonal treatment of cancer pain. Eur J Cancer Suppl,2005,3: 97 - 106.

共引文献43

同被引文献56

引证文献6

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部