摘要
应用两种ELISA技术分别对流行性出血热(EHF)患者25例的203份屎液标本特异性IgG,IgM抗体进行了系统的动态研究,发现抗体阳性率分别为84%(21/25)与60%(15/25).而16%(4/25)的患者在整个病程中既无IgG又无IgM抗体排出,表明尿抗体检测阴性结果不能作为EHF患者排除诊断的条件,仅为参考指标.病程中IgG抗体平均滴度动态水平与每日标本阳性率均高于IgM,且两种抗体的动态变化与尿蛋白相符合,证实尿抗体是由于肾脏损害而漏出的结果.
A sequential study on the specific IgG and IgM,antibodies 203 urine specimens from 25 patients of epidemio hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome Was performed by two kinds of ELISA techniques:The positive rates of IgG and IgM were 84%(21/25)and.60%(15/25)respectively,and 16% of the patients were negative.However,the negative result dose not imply the exclusion of the disease.We also found that the each-day samples'positive rates and mean titer of IgG were higher than IgM in the whole course of illness.It showed that they were leakages from the damaged kidneys
出处
《中华传染病杂志》
CAS
1988年第3期145-147,共3页
Chinese Journal of Infectious Diseases