因网络犯罪高发,学界提出将“打早打小”刑事政策用于治理网络犯罪,但依据尚未完备。需求弹性理论是犯罪经济学中的重要理论,其检验的是在刑事政策变化时犯罪的反应程度:当需求弹性越大,犯罪对刑事政策的反应程度越大,那么刑事政策对犯...因网络犯罪高发,学界提出将“打早打小”刑事政策用于治理网络犯罪,但依据尚未完备。需求弹性理论是犯罪经济学中的重要理论,其检验的是在刑事政策变化时犯罪的反应程度:当需求弹性越大,犯罪对刑事政策的反应程度越大,那么刑事政策对犯罪治理的作用就越大。通过需求弹性理论可以检验“打早打小”刑事政策与网络犯罪的匹配度。“打早打小”刑事政策基于其治理犯罪的源头性和打击犯罪的积极性符合我国网络犯罪治理的需求。采取“打早打小”刑事政策,有利于提高惩罚概率,从而提高惩罚价格,最终控制网络犯罪数量。积极运用“打早打小”刑事政策的同时,不能过于迷信单一政策治理,仍然需要遵循“宽严相济”基本刑事政策,防止突破罪刑法定原则。Due to the high incidence of cyber crimes, the academic community proposed to use the criminal policy of “fighting early and fighting small” to control cyber crimes, but the basis is not complete. The theory of demand elasticity is an important theory in criminal economics, which tests the response degree of crime when criminal policy changes: the greater the demand elasticity, the greater the response degree of crime to criminal policy, the greater the effect of criminal policy on criminal governance. The theory of demand elasticity can test the matching degree of “early and small” and cyber crime. The criminal policy of “fighting early and fighting small” is based on the source of crime governance and the enthusiasm of combating crime, which is in line with the needs of cyber crime governance in China. Adopting the criminal policy of “fighting early and fighting small” is conducive to improving the probability of punishment, thus raising the level of punishment price, and finally controlling the number of cyber crimes. While actively using the criminal policy of “fighting early and fighting small”, we should not be too superstitious about single policy governance. We still need to follow the basic criminal policy of “combining mercy with severity” to prevent breakthroughs through the principle of legal punishment.展开更多
文摘因网络犯罪高发,学界提出将“打早打小”刑事政策用于治理网络犯罪,但依据尚未完备。需求弹性理论是犯罪经济学中的重要理论,其检验的是在刑事政策变化时犯罪的反应程度:当需求弹性越大,犯罪对刑事政策的反应程度越大,那么刑事政策对犯罪治理的作用就越大。通过需求弹性理论可以检验“打早打小”刑事政策与网络犯罪的匹配度。“打早打小”刑事政策基于其治理犯罪的源头性和打击犯罪的积极性符合我国网络犯罪治理的需求。采取“打早打小”刑事政策,有利于提高惩罚概率,从而提高惩罚价格,最终控制网络犯罪数量。积极运用“打早打小”刑事政策的同时,不能过于迷信单一政策治理,仍然需要遵循“宽严相济”基本刑事政策,防止突破罪刑法定原则。Due to the high incidence of cyber crimes, the academic community proposed to use the criminal policy of “fighting early and fighting small” to control cyber crimes, but the basis is not complete. The theory of demand elasticity is an important theory in criminal economics, which tests the response degree of crime when criminal policy changes: the greater the demand elasticity, the greater the response degree of crime to criminal policy, the greater the effect of criminal policy on criminal governance. The theory of demand elasticity can test the matching degree of “early and small” and cyber crime. The criminal policy of “fighting early and fighting small” is based on the source of crime governance and the enthusiasm of combating crime, which is in line with the needs of cyber crime governance in China. Adopting the criminal policy of “fighting early and fighting small” is conducive to improving the probability of punishment, thus raising the level of punishment price, and finally controlling the number of cyber crimes. While actively using the criminal policy of “fighting early and fighting small”, we should not be too superstitious about single policy governance. We still need to follow the basic criminal policy of “combining mercy with severity” to prevent breakthroughs through the principle of legal punishment.
