This is an article something different from above. The author analyzes that in essnce the Flying - Geese Mode was out of the strategic need of America after World War II. Under such modes, the United States fosteres m...This is an article something different from above. The author analyzes that in essnce the Flying - Geese Mode was out of the strategic need of America after World War II. Under such modes, the United States fosteres many Asia countries, mainestly Japan, and transplanted a great deal of it’s domestie matured industries into them, while keeping their makets a relative open status in a long period. It made these countries absorb plenty of exports from export-oriented. However, as usually considered, this mode had following detects: single structure of export and a over-high dependant degree to the foreign trade. With the end of cold war, or with the change of world political and economic situation, this mode had been facing the ptoblem of a limited oversea market volume. The East Asia’s crisis may be seen as a result of this problem. So the author firmly believe that the Flying-Geese Mode has been to the end of it’s road and it should be given up without hesitation.展开更多
An important view that the author holds in this article is that the recent economic and finaflcial turblence rising in east Asia may not be able to mean that the East-Asia Mode is to be ended.The traditional understan...An important view that the author holds in this article is that the recent economic and finaflcial turblence rising in east Asia may not be able to mean that the East-Asia Mode is to be ended.The traditional understanding to this mode has gone into mistaken area. if we historically and developmentally regard this East-Asia mode, it could be found that this mode had 2 stages ──primary stage and advanced stage. The former is accompanied with strong govermental intervention and that labor or capital intensive indllstries were the main "comparative advantage" industries, while the later instead has a character of weak intervention and techology-intensive advantage industries. And the present turbulence, the author thlnks, may due to the transitional difficulty between the two stages.展开更多
文摘This is an article something different from above. The author analyzes that in essnce the Flying - Geese Mode was out of the strategic need of America after World War II. Under such modes, the United States fosteres many Asia countries, mainestly Japan, and transplanted a great deal of it’s domestie matured industries into them, while keeping their makets a relative open status in a long period. It made these countries absorb plenty of exports from export-oriented. However, as usually considered, this mode had following detects: single structure of export and a over-high dependant degree to the foreign trade. With the end of cold war, or with the change of world political and economic situation, this mode had been facing the ptoblem of a limited oversea market volume. The East Asia’s crisis may be seen as a result of this problem. So the author firmly believe that the Flying-Geese Mode has been to the end of it’s road and it should be given up without hesitation.
文摘An important view that the author holds in this article is that the recent economic and finaflcial turblence rising in east Asia may not be able to mean that the East-Asia Mode is to be ended.The traditional understanding to this mode has gone into mistaken area. if we historically and developmentally regard this East-Asia mode, it could be found that this mode had 2 stages ──primary stage and advanced stage. The former is accompanied with strong govermental intervention and that labor or capital intensive indllstries were the main "comparative advantage" industries, while the later instead has a character of weak intervention and techology-intensive advantage industries. And the present turbulence, the author thlnks, may due to the transitional difficulty between the two stages.
