目的:此次研究通常将常规的护理措施,与循证护理 + 心理干预在乙肝肝硬化患者中的应用效果进行对比,分析循证护理 + 心理干预的应用价值。方法:此次选取的 80 例样本,均来自 2019 年 1 月 -2020 年 1 月在本院进行治疗的乙肝肝硬化患者...目的:此次研究通常将常规的护理措施,与循证护理 + 心理干预在乙肝肝硬化患者中的应用效果进行对比,分析循证护理 + 心理干预的应用价值。方法:此次选取的 80 例样本,均来自 2019 年 1 月 -2020 年 1 月在本院进行治疗的乙肝肝硬化患者。通过电脑随机分配的方式,将其分为两个组:40 例样本采用常规的护理方法,设为对照组;另 40 例样本采取循证护理联合心理干预,设为联合组。对比两组的护理应用效果。结果:实施护理前,对比两组间的 SAS、SDS 评分,无意义 P ﹥ 0.05;实施护理后,联合组的SAS、SDS评分与对照组相比,明显比较低,组间对比P < 0.05。实施护理前,对比两组间的生存质量评分,无意义 P> 0.05;实施护理后,联合组的心理、生理、社会关系、环境等生存质量评分,与对照组相比明显更好,组间对比(P< 0.05)。结论:在乙肝肝硬化患者的治疗中,采用循证护理联合心理干预能够有效提升治疗效果,减轻负性情绪,提升生存质量,值得推广应用。Abstract:Objective: This study usually compares the application effect of routine nursing measures with evidence-based nursing + psychological intervention in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis, and analyzes the application value of evidence-based nursing + psychological intervention. Methods: The 80 samples selected this time were all from patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis who were treated in our hospital from January 2019 to January 2020. They were divided into two groups by random assignment by computer: 40 samples were treated with conventional nursing methods, which were set as the control group;the other 40 samples were treated with evidence-based nursing combined with psychological intervention, and were set as the combined group. The nursing effect of the two groups was compared. Results: Before the nursing, the SAS and SDS scores between the two groups were compared, and there was no significance P ﹥ 0.05;after the nursing, the SAS and SDS scores of the combined group were significantly lower than those of the control group, and the comparison between the groups was P < 0.05. Before the implementation of nursing, the quality of life scores between the two groups were compared, and there was no significance P﹥0.05;after the implementation of nursing, the psychological, physiological, social relations, environment and other quality of life scores of the combined group were significantly better than those of the control group. Contrast (P<0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of pat展开更多
文摘目的:此次研究通常将常规的护理措施,与循证护理 + 心理干预在乙肝肝硬化患者中的应用效果进行对比,分析循证护理 + 心理干预的应用价值。方法:此次选取的 80 例样本,均来自 2019 年 1 月 -2020 年 1 月在本院进行治疗的乙肝肝硬化患者。通过电脑随机分配的方式,将其分为两个组:40 例样本采用常规的护理方法,设为对照组;另 40 例样本采取循证护理联合心理干预,设为联合组。对比两组的护理应用效果。结果:实施护理前,对比两组间的 SAS、SDS 评分,无意义 P ﹥ 0.05;实施护理后,联合组的SAS、SDS评分与对照组相比,明显比较低,组间对比P < 0.05。实施护理前,对比两组间的生存质量评分,无意义 P> 0.05;实施护理后,联合组的心理、生理、社会关系、环境等生存质量评分,与对照组相比明显更好,组间对比(P< 0.05)。结论:在乙肝肝硬化患者的治疗中,采用循证护理联合心理干预能够有效提升治疗效果,减轻负性情绪,提升生存质量,值得推广应用。Abstract:Objective: This study usually compares the application effect of routine nursing measures with evidence-based nursing + psychological intervention in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis, and analyzes the application value of evidence-based nursing + psychological intervention. Methods: The 80 samples selected this time were all from patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis who were treated in our hospital from January 2019 to January 2020. They were divided into two groups by random assignment by computer: 40 samples were treated with conventional nursing methods, which were set as the control group;the other 40 samples were treated with evidence-based nursing combined with psychological intervention, and were set as the combined group. The nursing effect of the two groups was compared. Results: Before the nursing, the SAS and SDS scores between the two groups were compared, and there was no significance P ﹥ 0.05;after the nursing, the SAS and SDS scores of the combined group were significantly lower than those of the control group, and the comparison between the groups was P < 0.05. Before the implementation of nursing, the quality of life scores between the two groups were compared, and there was no significance P﹥0.05;after the implementation of nursing, the psychological, physiological, social relations, environment and other quality of life scores of the combined group were significantly better than those of the control group. Contrast (P<0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of pat
