It is commonly considered that the bunker on board is ownedby the Charterer after the delivery and before the redelivery underthe time charter party while consumed by the Owner. Where thereis no express stipulation as...It is commonly considered that the bunker on board is ownedby the Charterer after the delivery and before the redelivery underthe time charter party while consumed by the Owner. Where thereis no express stipulation as to the quantity, the price and the qualityof the bunker remaining on board, the dispute in respect of thebunker is most likely to arise. By pointing out the difference be-tween the "bunker" clause in NYPE’46 and that in NYPE’93, thisarticle is aimed at the analysis of the various reasons that the disputearises and how to avoid it.展开更多
租期是定期租船合同中一项非常重要的内容,在确定租金费率的过程中,应充分考虑租期长短这一因素。而且,租期条款对租家和船东而言均是严格责任,违反租期条款可能会面临支付巨额赔偿的风险。租期长短的表述主要有两种,第一种是以一段时...租期是定期租船合同中一项非常重要的内容,在确定租金费率的过程中,应充分考虑租期长短这一因素。而且,租期条款对租家和船东而言均是严格责任,违反租期条款可能会面临支付巨额赔偿的风险。租期长短的表述主要有两种,第一种是以一段时间作为租期,例如1年或6个月,另外一种则是以一个或几个航次(voyage)的历时作为租期。后者是一种常见的定期租船方式,被称作航次期租(Trip Time Charter或者Time Charter on Trip Basis)。从航程的角度理解,虽然以一个载货航次限定租期的航次期租合同与航次租船合同十分相似,但前者本质上仍属于定期租船合同。在英国高等法院近期审理的"The Wehr Trave"(1)一案中,法院对二者之间的差别进行了解释,也明确了"one time charter trip"的表述并非局限于一个载货航次。展开更多
文摘It is commonly considered that the bunker on board is ownedby the Charterer after the delivery and before the redelivery underthe time charter party while consumed by the Owner. Where thereis no express stipulation as to the quantity, the price and the qualityof the bunker remaining on board, the dispute in respect of thebunker is most likely to arise. By pointing out the difference be-tween the "bunker" clause in NYPE’46 and that in NYPE’93, thisarticle is aimed at the analysis of the various reasons that the disputearises and how to avoid it.
文摘租期是定期租船合同中一项非常重要的内容,在确定租金费率的过程中,应充分考虑租期长短这一因素。而且,租期条款对租家和船东而言均是严格责任,违反租期条款可能会面临支付巨额赔偿的风险。租期长短的表述主要有两种,第一种是以一段时间作为租期,例如1年或6个月,另外一种则是以一个或几个航次(voyage)的历时作为租期。后者是一种常见的定期租船方式,被称作航次期租(Trip Time Charter或者Time Charter on Trip Basis)。从航程的角度理解,虽然以一个载货航次限定租期的航次期租合同与航次租船合同十分相似,但前者本质上仍属于定期租船合同。在英国高等法院近期审理的"The Wehr Trave"(1)一案中,法院对二者之间的差别进行了解释,也明确了"one time charter trip"的表述并非局限于一个载货航次。
