目的 探讨国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组织（IADPSG）标准和美国国家糖尿病数据组（NDDG）标准诊断妊娠期糖尿病（GDM）与不良妊娠结局关系.方法 随机选择从2012年1月-2014年1月在门诊完成产检,住院分娩且临床资料完整的单胎孕妇.在孕24-28周...目的 探讨国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组织（IADPSG）标准和美国国家糖尿病数据组（NDDG）标准诊断妊娠期糖尿病（GDM）与不良妊娠结局关系.方法 随机选择从2012年1月-2014年1月在门诊完成产检,住院分娩且临床资料完整的单胎孕妇.在孕24-28周时进行口服75 g葡萄糖耐量试验（oral glucose tolerance test,OGTT）,分别采用IADPSG及NDDG两种标准确诊为GDM患者的共323例（GDM组）,其中达到NDDG标准的为A组（174例）,达到IADPSG标准但未达到NDDG标准的为B组（149例）,另选择同期住院分娩的非GDM正常孕妇323例为对照组,分别统计分析各组新生儿高胆红素血症、新生儿低血糖、新生儿呼吸窘迫、子痫前期、胎膜早破、羊水过多及巨大儿不良结局的发生率.分别分析两组间差异有无显著统计学意义.结果 统计分析比较各组不良结局的发生率.其中,GDM组：高胆红素血症（2.8％ vs 0.6％）,新生儿低血糖（2.2％ vs o.3％）,子痫前期（1.9％ vs 0.0％）及胎膜早破率（2.2％ vs 0.0％）的发生率明显高于正常对照组,两组间差异有统计学显著性意义（χ^2=4.5-7.5,P值均＜0.05）,新生儿呼吸窘迫（2.2％ vs 0.6％）,羊水过多（1.5％ vs 0.3％）和巨大儿（3.1％vs 1.2％）的发生率高于对照组,但两组间差异无统计学意义（（χ^2=2.6-2.9,P值均＞0.05）;A组：新生儿高胆红素血症（2.9％vs 2.7％）,新生儿低血糖（2.3％ vs 2.0％）,新生儿呼吸窘迫（2.3％vs 2.0％）,痫前期（2.3％vs 1.3％）,胎膜早破（1.7％vs 0.7％）,羊水过多（1.7％vs 1.3％）及巨大儿（3.4％vs 2.7％）的发生率均高于B组,但两组间差异无统计学显著性意义（χ^2=0.01-0.80,P值均＞0.05）.结论 IADPSG诊断标准的敏感度比NDDG标准高,将达不到NDDG标准的轻型GDM患者纳入妊娠期血糖管理中,有效地降低其不良妊娠结局的发生率.展开更多
Background: Diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (AD) depends on clinical features because no definitive diagnostic test exists. Criteria proposed by Hanifin and Rajka (Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1980; Suppl 92: 44-47) wer...Background: Diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (AD) depends on clinical features because no definitive diagnostic test exists. Criteria proposed by Hanifin and Rajka (Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1980; Suppl 92: 44-47) were acceptable for hospital based studies but were found not to be suitable for field studies. A UK working party formulated clinical diagnostic criteria that could be used in both hospital and epidemiological settings. Validation studies of the criteria showed widely variable results, probably due to different clinical settings and ethnicity. Aim and objective: This study was undertaken to validate Hanifin and Rajka’s criteria and to assess the comparative efficacy of their criteria and the UK working party’s diagnostic criteria in the diagnosis of AD in a hospital setting in North India. Subjects and methods: This study serially included 101 patients with AD and 48 controls of paediatric age group. The study period was from July 2003 to December 2004. Results: Hanifin and Rajka’s criteria [sensitivity 96%, specificity 93.75%, positive predictive value 97%(PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) 91.84%] had a statistical advantage over the UK working party’s diagnostic criteria (sensitivity 86%, specificity 95.83%, PPV 97.75%and NPV 76.67%), with a P-value < 0.005.展开更多
文摘目的 探讨国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组织（IADPSG）标准和美国国家糖尿病数据组（NDDG）标准诊断妊娠期糖尿病（GDM）与不良妊娠结局关系.方法 随机选择从2012年1月-2014年1月在门诊完成产检,住院分娩且临床资料完整的单胎孕妇.在孕24-28周时进行口服75 g葡萄糖耐量试验（oral glucose tolerance test,OGTT）,分别采用IADPSG及NDDG两种标准确诊为GDM患者的共323例（GDM组）,其中达到NDDG标准的为A组（174例）,达到IADPSG标准但未达到NDDG标准的为B组（149例）,另选择同期住院分娩的非GDM正常孕妇323例为对照组,分别统计分析各组新生儿高胆红素血症、新生儿低血糖、新生儿呼吸窘迫、子痫前期、胎膜早破、羊水过多及巨大儿不良结局的发生率.分别分析两组间差异有无显著统计学意义.结果 统计分析比较各组不良结局的发生率.其中,GDM组：高胆红素血症（2.8％ vs 0.6％）,新生儿低血糖（2.2％ vs o.3％）,子痫前期（1.9％ vs 0.0％）及胎膜早破率（2.2％ vs 0.0％）的发生率明显高于正常对照组,两组间差异有统计学显著性意义（χ^2=4.5-7.5,P值均＜0.05）,新生儿呼吸窘迫（2.2％ vs 0.6％）,羊水过多（1.5％ vs 0.3％）和巨大儿（3.1％vs 1.2％）的发生率高于对照组,但两组间差异无统计学意义（（χ^2=2.6-2.9,P值均＞0.05）;A组：新生儿高胆红素血症（2.9％vs 2.7％）,新生儿低血糖（2.3％ vs 2.0％）,新生儿呼吸窘迫（2.3％vs 2.0％）,痫前期（2.3％vs 1.3％）,胎膜早破（1.7％vs 0.7％）,羊水过多（1.7％vs 1.3％）及巨大儿（3.4％vs 2.7％）的发生率均高于B组,但两组间差异无统计学显著性意义（χ^2=0.01-0.80,P值均＞0.05）.结论 IADPSG诊断标准的敏感度比NDDG标准高,将达不到NDDG标准的轻型GDM患者纳入妊娠期血糖管理中,有效地降低其不良妊娠结局的发生率.
文摘Background: Diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (AD) depends on clinical features because no definitive diagnostic test exists. Criteria proposed by Hanifin and Rajka (Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1980; Suppl 92: 44-47) were acceptable for hospital based studies but were found not to be suitable for field studies. A UK working party formulated clinical diagnostic criteria that could be used in both hospital and epidemiological settings. Validation studies of the criteria showed widely variable results, probably due to different clinical settings and ethnicity. Aim and objective: This study was undertaken to validate Hanifin and Rajka’s criteria and to assess the comparative efficacy of their criteria and the UK working party’s diagnostic criteria in the diagnosis of AD in a hospital setting in North India. Subjects and methods: This study serially included 101 patients with AD and 48 controls of paediatric age group. The study period was from July 2003 to December 2004. Results: Hanifin and Rajka’s criteria [sensitivity 96%, specificity 93.75%, positive predictive value 97%(PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) 91.84%] had a statistical advantage over the UK working party’s diagnostic criteria (sensitivity 86%, specificity 95.83%, PPV 97.75%and NPV 76.67%), with a P-value < 0.005.
