For the design and operation of a floating bridge, the understanding of its dynamic behavior under a moving load is of great importance. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the dynamic performances of a new ty...For the design and operation of a floating bridge, the understanding of its dynamic behavior under a moving load is of great importance. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the dynamic performances of a new type floating bridge, the pontoon-separated floating bridge, under the effect of a moving load. In the paper, a brief summary of the dynamic analysis of the floating bridge is first introduced. The motion equations for a pontoon-separated floating bridge, considering the nonlinear properties of connectors and vehicles＇ inertia effects, are proposed. The super-element method is applied to reduce the numerical analysis scale to solve the reduced equations. Based on the static analysis, the dynamic features of the new type floating bridge subjected to a moving load are investigated. It is found that the dynamie behavior of the pontoon-separated floating bridge is superior to that of the ribbon bridge by taking the nonlinearity of eonneetors into account.展开更多
A mathematical model of a ribbon pontoon bridge subjected to moving loads was formulated using the theory of simply supported beams.Two types of moving load models were used, the first a moving-constant-force model an...A mathematical model of a ribbon pontoon bridge subjected to moving loads was formulated using the theory of simply supported beams.Two types of moving load models were used, the first a moving-constant-force model and the second a moving-mass model.Using both types of loads, the dynamic behavior of a ribbon pontoon bridge was simulated while subjected to a single moving load and then multiple moving loads.Modeling was done with the Simulink package in MATLAB software.Results indicated that the model is correct.The two types of moving load models made little difference to the response ranges when loads moved on the bridge, but made some difference to the response phases.When loads left, the amplitude of the dynamic responses induced by the moving-constant-force model load were larger than those induced by the moving-mass model.There was a great deal more difference when there were more loads.展开更多
基金This project was supported by the Commission of Science Technology and Industry for National Defense .
文摘For the design and operation of a floating bridge, the understanding of its dynamic behavior under a moving load is of great importance. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the dynamic performances of a new type floating bridge, the pontoon-separated floating bridge, under the effect of a moving load. In the paper, a brief summary of the dynamic analysis of the floating bridge is first introduced. The motion equations for a pontoon-separated floating bridge, considering the nonlinear properties of connectors and vehicles＇ inertia effects, are proposed. The super-element method is applied to reduce the numerical analysis scale to solve the reduced equations. Based on the static analysis, the dynamic features of the new type floating bridge subjected to a moving load are investigated. It is found that the dynamie behavior of the pontoon-separated floating bridge is superior to that of the ribbon bridge by taking the nonlinearity of eonneetors into account.
文摘A mathematical model of a ribbon pontoon bridge subjected to moving loads was formulated using the theory of simply supported beams.Two types of moving load models were used, the first a moving-constant-force model and the second a moving-mass model.Using both types of loads, the dynamic behavior of a ribbon pontoon bridge was simulated while subjected to a single moving load and then multiple moving loads.Modeling was done with the Simulink package in MATLAB software.Results indicated that the model is correct.The two types of moving load models made little difference to the response ranges when loads moved on the bridge, but made some difference to the response phases.When loads left, the amplitude of the dynamic responses induced by the moving-constant-force model load were larger than those induced by the moving-mass model.There was a great deal more difference when there were more loads.
