期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
64层螺旋CT血管成像与冠状动脉造影对冠心病诊断价值的对比研究 被引量:9
1
作者 费军 安野泰史 +4 位作者 近藤武 左藤贵久 皿井正义 菱田仁 田和广 《中华老年心脑血管病杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2007年第5期314-316,共3页
目的评价64层螺旋CT在冠状动脉造影方面的诊断价值。方法58例临床诊断或可疑冠心病患者行64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像检查,分别对左主干、左前降支、回旋支和右冠状动脉及其分支的重建图像行影像学评价,所有患者均行常规选择性冠状动脉造影... 目的评价64层螺旋CT在冠状动脉造影方面的诊断价值。方法58例临床诊断或可疑冠心病患者行64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像检查,分别对左主干、左前降支、回旋支和右冠状动脉及其分支的重建图像行影像学评价,所有患者均行常规选择性冠状动脉造影检查作为对照。结果58例患者共757(87.0%)节段的冠状动脉(血管直径≥1.5 mm)成像,638节段(84.3%)可用于多层螺旋CT和冠状动脉造影定量分析。冠状动脉造影共发现狭窄101节段,多层螺旋CT发现狭窄104节段,多层螺旋CT对冠状动脉狭窄诊断的敏感性为86.1%,特异性为96.8%。结论64层螺旋CT冠状动脉造影可作为诊断冠状动脉病变的一种无创筛选方法。 展开更多
关键词 冠状动脉硬化 冠状血管造影术 体层摄影术 X线计算机 诊断
下载PDF
The accuracy and optimal slice thickness of multislice helical computed tomography for right and left ventricular volume measurement 被引量:1
2
作者 崔炜 近藤武 +12 位作者 安野泰史Department of Radiological Technology School of Health Sciences Fujita Health University Toyoake 470-1192 Japan 郭玉印 佐藤贵久 皿井正羲 篠崎仁史 柿澤聡士 杉浦厚司 大岛慶太 片田和廣 菱田仁 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2004年第9期1283-1287,共5页
Background Multislice helical computed tomography (MSCT) has been used to depict coronary anatomy noninvasively, and proved useful for evaluating ventricular function. The aim of our study was to assess the accuracy... Background Multislice helical computed tomography (MSCT) has been used to depict coronary anatomy noninvasively, and proved useful for evaluating ventricular function. The aim of our study was to assess the accuracy of ventricular volume as measured by MSCT.Methods Fourteen human left ventricular (LV) and 15 right ventricular (RV) casts were scanned by MSCT. A series of LV and RV short-axis images were reconstructed later with slice thickness of 2.0 mm, 3.5 mm, 5.0 mm, 7.0 mm, and 10.0 mm. Ventricular volume was calculated by the multislice tomographic Simpson’s method. True LV and RV cast volumes were determined by water displacement. Results Both calculated LV and RV volumes correlated highly with the corresponding true volumes (all r>0.95, P<0.01). But with slice thickness from 2.0 mm to 10.0 mm, MSCT scanning overestimated the corresponding true volume by (3.21±5.95) ml to (12.58±8.56) ml for LV and (10.22±8.45) ml to (23.91±12.24) ml for RV (all P<0.01). There was a very high correlation between the overestimation and the selected slice thickness for both LV and RV volume measurements (r=0.998 and 0.996, P<0.01, respectively). However, when slice thickness was reduced to 5.0 mm, the overestimation for both LV and RV volume measurements became nonsignificant for slice thickness from 2.0 mm to 5.0 mm. Conclusions Both LV and RV volumes can be accurately estimated by MSCT. Thinner slice has more accurate calculated volume. However, 5.0 mm slice thickness is thin enough for an accurate measurement of LV or RV volume. 展开更多
关键词 multislice helical computed tomography ventricular volume CAST slice thickness
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部