Tumor formation of prostate cancer cells influenced by stromal cells from the transitional or peripheral zones of the normal prostate

This study was designed to investigate the different involvements of prostatic stromal cells from the normal transitional zone(TZ)or peripheral zone(PZ)in the carcinogenesis of prostate cancer(PCa)epithelial cells(PC-3)in vitro and in vivo co-culture models.Ultra-structures and gene expression profiles of primary cultures of human prostatic stromal cells from the normal TZ or PZ were analyzed by electron microscopy and microarray analysis.In vitro and in vivo co-culture models composed of normal TZ or PZ stromal cells and human PCa PC-3 cells were established.We assessed tumor growth and weight in the in vivo nude mice model.There are morphological and ultra-structural differences in stromal cells from TZ and PZ of the normal prostate.In all,514 differentially expressed genes were selected by microarray analysis;483 genes were more highly expressed in stromal cells from TZ and 31 were more highly expressed in those from PZ.Co-culture with PZ stromal cells and transforming growth factor-β1(TGF-β1)increased the tumor growth of PC-3 cells in vitro and in vivo,as well as Bcl-2 expression.On the other hand,stromal cells of TZ suppressed PC-3 cell tumor growth in the mouse model.We conclude that ultra-structures and gene expression differ between the stromal cells from TZ or PZ of the normal prostate,and stroma-epithelium interactions from TZ or PZ might be responsible for the distinct zonal localization of prostate tumor formation.

Clinical practice guideline for transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia(2021 Edition)

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is highly prevalent among older men, impacting on their quality of life, sexual function, and genitourinary health, and has become an important global burden of disease. Transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate (TUPKP) is one of the foremost surgical procedures for the treatment of BPH. It has become well established in clinical practice with good efficacy and safety. In 2018, we issued the guideline “2018 Standard Edition”. However much new direct evidence has now emerged and this may change some of previous recommendations. The time is ripe to develop new evidence-based guidelines, so we formed a working group of clinical experts and methodologists. The steering group members posed 31 questions relevant to the management of TUPKP for BPH covering the following areas: questions relevant to the perioperative period (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) of TUPKP in the treatment of BPH, postoperative complications and the level of surgeons’ surgical skill. We searched the literature for direct evidence on the management of TUPKP for BPH, and assessed its certainty generated recommendations using the grade criteria by the European Association of Urology. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of an ungraded consensus-based statement. Finally, we issued 36 statements. Among them, 23 carried strong recommendations, and 13 carried weak recommendations for the stated procedure. They covered questions relevant to the aforementioned three areas. The preoperative period for TUPKP in the treatment of BPH included indications and contraindications for TUPKP, precautions for preoperative preparation in patients with renal impairment and urinary tract infection due to urinary retention, and preoperative prophylactic use of antibiotics. Questions relevant to the intraoperative period incorporated surgical operation techniques and prevention and management of bladder explosion. The application to different populations incorporating the efficacy and safety of TUPKP in the treatment of normal volume (< 80 ml) and large-volume (≥ 80 ml) BPH compared with transurethral urethral resection prostate, transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate and open prostatectomy;the efficacy and safety of TUPKP in high-risk populations and among people taking anticoagulant (antithrombotic) drugs. Questions relevant to the postoperative period incorporated the time and speed of flushing, the time indwelling catheters are needed, principles of postoperative therapeutic use of antibiotics, follow-up time and follow-up content. Questions related to complications incorporated types of complications and their incidence, postoperative leukocyturia, the treatment measures for the perforation and extravasation of the capsule, transurethral resection syndrome, postoperative bleeding, urinary catheter blockage, bladder spasm, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence, urethral stricture, rectal injury during surgery, postoperative erectile dysfunction and retrograde ejaculation. Final questions were related to surgeons’ skills when performing TUPKP for the treatment of BPH. We hope these recommendations can help support healthcare workers caring for patients having TUPKP for the treatment of BPH.

Chimeric molecules facilitate the degradation of androgen receptors and repress the growth of LNCaP cells

Post-translational degradation of protein plays an important role in cell life. We employed chimeric molecules （dihydrotestosterone-based proteolysis-targeting chimeric molecule [DHT-PROTAC]） to facilitate androgen receptor （AR） degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway （UPP） and to investigate the role of AR in cell proliferation and viability in androgen-sensitive prostate cancer cells. Western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry were applied to analyse AR levels in LNCaP cells after DHT-PROTAC treatment. Cell counting and the 3-（4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl）-2,5- diphenyl tetrazolium bromide （MTT） cell viability assay were used to evaluate cell proliferation and viability after AR elimination in both LNCaP and PC-3 cells. AR was tagged for elimination via the UPP by DHT-PROTAC, and this could be blocked by proteasome inhibitors. Degradation of AR depended on DHT-PROTAC concentration, and either DHT or an ALAPYIP-（arg）8 peptide could compete with DHT-PROTAC. Inhibition of cell proliferation and decreased viability were observed in LNCaP cells, but not in PC-3 or 786-0 cells after DHT-PROTAC treatment. These data indicate that AR elimination is facilitated via the UPP by DHT-PROTAC, and that the growth of LNCaP cells is repressed after AR degradation.

Differences in phenotype and gene expression of prostate stromal cells from patients of varying ages and their influence on tumour formation by prostate epithelial cells

Prostate cancer （PCa） is an age-related disease, and the stromal microenvironment plays an important role in prostatic malignant progression. However, the differences in prostate stromal cells present in young and old tissue are still obscure. We established primary cultured stromal cells from normal prostatic peripheral zone （PZ） of donors of varying ages and found that cultured stromal cells from old donors （PZ-old） were more enlarged and polygonal than those from young donors （PZ-young）. Furthermore, based on immunocytochemical and ultrastructural analysis, the components of stromal cells changed from a majority of fibroblasts to a mixture of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts with increasing donor age. Using a three-dimensional in vitro culture system, we found that PZ-old stromal cells could enhance the proliferation, migration and invasion of cocultured benign BPH-1 and PC-3 cells. Using an in vivo tissue recombination system, we also found that PZ-old stromal cells are more effective than PZ-young cells in promoting tumour formation by BPH-1 cells of high passage（〉100） and PC-3 cells. To probe the possible mechanism of these effects, we performed cDNA microarray analysis and profiled 509 upregulated genes and 188 downregulated genes in PZ-old cells. Among the changed genes, we found genes coding for a subset of paracrine factors that are capable of influencing adjacent epithelial cells; these include hepatocyte growth factor （HGF）, fibroblast growth factor 5 （FGF5）, insulin-like growth factor 2 （IGF2）, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 4 （IGFBP4）, IGFBP5 and matrix metallopeptidase 1 （MMP1）. Changes in the expression of these genes were further confirmed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction （PCR）, Western blotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Overall, our findings indicate that stromal cells from prostate PZ of old donors are more active than similar cells from young donors in promoting the malignant process of adjacent epithelial cells. This finding hints at a new potential strategy for the prevention of PCa.

Androgen receptors expressed by prostatic stromal cells obtained from younger versus older males exhibit opposite roles in prostate cancer progression

Aging is a major risk factor for prostate cancer （PCa）, and prostatic stromal cells may also promote PCa progression. Accordingly, stromal cells do not equally promote PCa in older males and younger males. Therefore, it is also possible that the expression of androgen receptors （ARs） by prostatic stromal cells in older versus younger males plays different roles in PCa progression. Using a gene knockdown technique and coculture system, we found that the knockdown of the AR in prostatic stromal cells obtained from younger males could promote the invasiveness and metastasis of cocultured PC3/LNCaP cells in vitro. By contrast, the invasiveness and metastasis of LNCaP cells was inhibited when cocultured with prostatic stromal cells from older males that when AR expression was knocked down. Moreover, after targeting AR expression with small hairpin RNA （shRNA）, matrix metalloproteinase （MMP） expression in stromal cells was observed to increase in the younger group, but decreased or remained unchanged in the older group. One exception, however, was observed with MMP9. In vivo, after knocking down AR expression in prostatic stromal cells, the incidence of metastatic lymph nodes was observed to increase in the younger age group, but decreased in the older age group. Together, these data suggest that the AR in prostatic stromal cells played opposite roles in PCa metastasis for older versus younger males. Therefore, collectively, the function of the AR in prostatic stromal cells appears to change with age, and this may account for the increased incidence of PCa in older males.

Peripheral zone PSA density:a predominant variable to improve prostate cancer detection efficiency in men with PSA higher than 4 ng ml^(-1)

To improve the diagnostic efficiency of prostate cancer(PCa)and reduce unnecessary biopsies,we defined and analyzed the diagnostic efficiency of peripheral zone prostate-specific antigen(PSA)density(PZ-PSAD).Patients who underwent systematic 12-core prostate biopsies in Shanghai General Hospital(Shanghai,China)between January 2012 and January 2018 were retrospectively identified(n=529).Another group of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia(n=100)were randomly preselected to obtain the PSA density of the non-PCa cohort(N-PSAD).Prostate volumes and transition zone volumes were measured using multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging(mpMRI)and were combined with PSA and N-PSAD to obtain the PZ-PSAD from a specific algorithm.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve analysis was used to assess the PCa detection efficiency in patients stratified by PSA level,and the area under the ROC curve(AUC)of PZ-PSAD was higher than that of PSA,PSA density(PSAD),and transition zone PSA density(TZ-PSAD).PZ-PSAD could amend the diagnosis for more than half of the patients with inaccurate transrectal ultrasonography(TRUS)and mpMRI results.When TRUS and mpMRI findings were ambiguous to predict PCa(PIRADS score≤3),PZ-PSAD could increase the positive rate of biopsy from 21.7%to 54.7%,and help 63.8%(150/235)of patients avoid unnecessary prostate biopsy.In patients whose PSA was 4.0–10.0 ng ml^(−1),10.1–20.0 ng ml^(−1),and>20.0 ng ml^(−1),the ideal PZ-PSAD cut-off value for predicting clinically significant PCa was 0.019 ng ml^(−2),0.297 ng ml^(−2),and 1.180 ng ml^(−2),respectively(sensitivity>90%).Compared with PSA,PSAD,and TZ-PSAD,the efficiency of PZ-PSAD for predicting PCa is the highest,leading to fewer missed diagnoses and unnecessary biopsies.

Two-micrometer thulium laser resection of the prostate-tangerine technique in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients with previously negative transrectal prostate biopsy

The 2-1μm thulium laser resection of the prostate-tangerine technique （TmLRP-TT） has been introduced as a minimally invasive treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia （BPH）. This study was undertaken to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of TmLRP-TT for the treatment of BPH patients with previously negative transrectal prostate biopsy. A prospective analysis of 51 patients with previously negative transrectal prostate biopsy who underwent surgical treatment using TmLRP-TT was performed from December 2011 to December 2013. Preoperative status, surgical details, and perioperative complications were recorded. The follow-up outcome was evaluated with subjective and objective tests at I and 6 months. TmLRP-TT was successfully completed in all patients. Mean prostate volume, operative duration, and catheterization time were 93.3 ± 37.9 ml, 69.5 ± 39.5 min, and 6.5 ± 1.3 days, respectively. The mean International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life score, maximum urinary flow rate, and post-void residual urine volume changed notably at 6-month follow-up （22.5 ± 6.9 vs 6.1 ± 3.2, 4.8 ± 1.3 vs 1.1 ± 0.9, 7.3 ± 4.5 vs 18.9 ± 7.1 ml s^-1, and 148.7 ± 168.7 vs 28.4 ± 17.9 ml）. Two （3.9%） patients required blood transfusion perioperatively, while 3 （5.9%） patients experienced transient hematuria postoperatively, and 2 （3.9%） patients received 3 days recatheterization due to clot retention. TmLRP-TT is a safe and effective minimally invasive technique for patients with previously negative transrectal prostate biopsy during the 6-month follow-up. This promising technology may be a feasible surgical method for previously negative transrectal prostate biopsy in the future.

Low serum testosterone predicts upgrading and upstaging of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

Often, pathological Gleason Score （GS） and stage of prostate cancer （PCa） were inconsistent with biopsy GS and clinical stage.However, there were no widely accepted methods predicting upgrading and upstaging PCa. In our study, we investigated the association between serum testosterone and upgrading or upstaging of PCa after radical prostatectomy （RP）. We enrolled 167 patients with PCa with biopsy GS 〈6, clinical stage ≤T2c, and prostate-specific antigen （PSA） 〈10 ng ml-1 from April 2009 to April 2015. Data including age, body mass index, preoperative PSA level, comorbidity, clinical presentation, and preoperative serum total testosterone level were collected. Upgrading occurred in 62 （37.1%） patients, and upstaging occurred in 73 （43.7%） patients. Preoperative testosterone was lower in the upgrading than nonupgrading group （3.72 vs 4.56, P 〈 0.01）. Patients in the upstaging groUp had lower preoperative testosterone than those in the nonupstaging group （3.84 vs 4.57, P = 0.01）. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, as both continuous and categorical variables, low serum testosterone was confirmed to be an independent predictor of pathological upgrading （P = 0.01 and P = 0.01） and upstaging （P = 0.01 and P = 0.02） after RR We suggest that low serum testosterone （〈3 ng ml-1） is associated with a high rate of upgrading and upstaging after RP. It is better for surgeons to ensure close monitoring of PSA levels and imaging examination when selecting non-RP treatment, to be cautious in proceeding with nerve-sparing surgery, and to be enthusiastic in performing extended lymph node dissection when selecting RP treatment for patients with low serum testosterone.