Background Diabetes is frequently associated with poor prognosis among acute myocardial infarction(AMI)patients.Patients with these comorbidities often have atypical symptoms and subsequent delay in treatment.Few stud...Background Diabetes is frequently associated with poor prognosis among acute myocardial infarction(AMI)patients.Patients with these comorbidities often have atypical symptoms and subsequent delay in treatment.Few studies have reported detailed AMI symptoms in patients with diabetes.This study compared AMI symptoms and presentation characteristics between diabetics and non-diabetics.Methods We included patients from the China AMI registry diagnosed with AMI between January 2013 and September 2014.Baseline characteristics,symptomology,and delay in treatment were compared between diabetics and non-diabetics.Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to explore independent predictors of atypical symptoms.Results A total of 4450(20.2%)patients had diabetes.They were older,more often women,higher in body mass index,and more likely to have non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.Fewer diabetic patients presented with persistent precordial chest pain(63.1%vs.68%,P<0.0001),diaphoresis(60.1%vs.65.6%,P<0.0001),fatigue(16.7%vs.18.3%,P=0.0123),and incontinence(0.4%vs.0.7%,P=0.0093).Time to hospital presentation was longer among patients with diabetes than those without.In multivariable analysis,diabetes was identified as an independent predictor of atypical symptoms(OR:1.112,95%CI:1.034?1.196).Conclusions Our study is the first large-scale study providing evidence that diabetics are less likely to present with typical chest pain and more likely to experience treatment delay when suffering from an AMI.Our results may increase clinician awareness of recognizing AMI patients rapidly to reduce diagnosis and treatment delay,particularly in the context of diabetes.展开更多
Objectives To evaluate the feasibility and safety of a second generation robotic percutaneous coronary intervention(R-PCI)system in China.Background Robotic PCI has been shown to be an effective method for conducting ...Objectives To evaluate the feasibility and safety of a second generation robotic percutaneous coronary intervention(R-PCI)system in China.Background Robotic PCI has been shown to be an effective method for conducting coronary interventions.It has further benefits of more accurate lesion measurement,improved stent deployment,reduced incidence of geographic miss and reduction of operator radiation exposure.Methods This single center evaluation enrolled 10 consecutive patients who had been selected for PCI.Clinical success was defined as residual stenosis<30%and no in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events.Learning curve effect was assessed by comparing efficiency metrics of early vs.later cases.Results Eleven lesions were treated all successfully without manual interruption or MACE events.Most lesions(63%)were ACC/AHA class B2 and C.Mean procedure time was 57.7±26.4 min,however two procedures were part of live demonstrations.Excluding the two live cases,the mean procedure time was 51.8±23.7 min.Procedural efficiency tended to improve from early cases to later cases based on PCI time(48.3±32.9 vs.25.5±13.0 min,P=0.27),fluoroscopy time(20.3±8.2 vs.12.5±4.6 min,P=0.16),contrast volume(145.0±28.9 vs.102.5±17.1 mL,P=0.05)and Air Kerma dose(1932±978 vs.1007±70 mGy,P=0.31).Conclusions Second generation robotic PCI was safe,effective and there were trends toward improvements in procedural efficiency during this early experience in China.展开更多
Background: Approximately 70% patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) presented without ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram. Patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) often pr...Background: Approximately 70% patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) presented without ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram. Patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) often presented with atypical symptoms, which may be related to pre-hospital delay and increased risk of mortality. However, up to date few studies reported detailed symptomatology of NSTEMI, particularly among Asian patients. The objective of this study was to describe and compare symptoms and presenting characteristics of NSTEMI vs. STEMI patients. Methods: We enrolled 21,994 patients diagnosed with AMI from China Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) Registry between January 2013 and September 2014. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to ST-segment elevation: ST-segment elevation (STEMI) group and NSTEMI group. We extracted data on patients' characteristics and detailed symptomatology and compared these variables between two groups. Results: Compared with patients with STEMI (N=16,315), those with NSTEMI (N=5679) were older, more often females and more often have comorbidities. Patients with NSTEMI were less likely to present with persistent chest pain (54.3% vs.71.4%), diaphoresis (48.6% vs.70.0%), radiation pain (26.4% vs.33.8%), and more likely to have chest distress (42.4% vs.38.3%) than STEMI patients (all P<0.0001). Patients with NSTEMI were also had longer time to hospital. In multivariable analysis, NSTEMI was independent predictor of presentation without chest pain (odds ratio: 1.974, 95% confidence interval:1.849-2.107). Conclusions: Patients with NSTEMI were more likely to present with chest distress and pre-hospital patient delay compared with patients with STEMI. It is necessary for both clinicians and patients to learn more about atypical symptoms of NSTEMI in order to rapidly recognize myocardial infarction.展开更多
Background:Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI)who present without typical chest pain are associated with a poor outcome.However,whether angiographic characteristics are related to a higher ...Background:Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI)who present without typical chest pain are associated with a poor outcome.However,whether angiographic characteristics are related to a higher risk of mortality in this population is unclear.This study aimed to investigate whether the higher mortality risk in patients with STEMI without chest pain could be explained by their"high-risk"angiographic characteristics.Methods:We used data of 12,145 patients with STEMI who was registered in China Acute Myocardial Infarction registry from January 2013 to September 2014.We compared the infarct-related artery(IRA),thrombolysis in myocardial infarction(TIMI)flow grade in the IRA,and other angiographic characteristics between patients without and those with chest pain.Multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify independent risk factor of in-hospital mortality.Results:The 2922(24.1%)patients with STEMI presented without typical chest pain.These patients had a higher TIMI flow grade(mean TIMI flow grade:1.00 vs.0.94,P=0.02)and a lower rate of IRA disease of the left anterior descending artery(44.6%vs.51.2%,χ^2=35.63,P<0.01)than did those with typical chest pain.Patients without chest pain were older,more likely to have diabetes,longer time to hospital and higher Killip classification,and less likely to receive optimal medication treatment and primary percutaneous coronary intervention and higher In-hospital mortality(3.3%vs.2.2%,χ^2=10.57,P<0.01).After adjusting for multi-variables,presentation without chest pain was still an independent predictor of in-hospital death among patients with STEMI(adjusted odds ratio:1.36,95%confidence interval:1.02–1.83).Conclusions:Presentation without chest pain is common and associated with a higher in-hospital mortality risk in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Our results indicate that their poor prognosis is associated with baseline patient characteristics and delayed treatment,but not angiographic lesion characteristics.Clinical trial registration:NCT01874691,https://clinicaltrials.gov.展开更多
基金supported by CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (2016-I2M-1-009)the Twelfth Five-Year Planning Project of the Scientific and Technological Department of China (2011BAI11B02)2014 Special fund for scientific research in the public interest by National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China (No. 201402001)
文摘Background Diabetes is frequently associated with poor prognosis among acute myocardial infarction(AMI)patients.Patients with these comorbidities often have atypical symptoms and subsequent delay in treatment.Few studies have reported detailed AMI symptoms in patients with diabetes.This study compared AMI symptoms and presentation characteristics between diabetics and non-diabetics.Methods We included patients from the China AMI registry diagnosed with AMI between January 2013 and September 2014.Baseline characteristics,symptomology,and delay in treatment were compared between diabetics and non-diabetics.Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to explore independent predictors of atypical symptoms.Results A total of 4450(20.2%)patients had diabetes.They were older,more often women,higher in body mass index,and more likely to have non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.Fewer diabetic patients presented with persistent precordial chest pain(63.1%vs.68%,P<0.0001),diaphoresis(60.1%vs.65.6%,P<0.0001),fatigue(16.7%vs.18.3%,P=0.0123),and incontinence(0.4%vs.0.7%,P=0.0093).Time to hospital presentation was longer among patients with diabetes than those without.In multivariable analysis,diabetes was identified as an independent predictor of atypical symptoms(OR:1.112,95%CI:1.034?1.196).Conclusions Our study is the first large-scale study providing evidence that diabetics are less likely to present with typical chest pain and more likely to experience treatment delay when suffering from an AMI.Our results may increase clinician awareness of recognizing AMI patients rapidly to reduce diagnosis and treatment delay,particularly in the context of diabetes.
文摘Objectives To evaluate the feasibility and safety of a second generation robotic percutaneous coronary intervention(R-PCI)system in China.Background Robotic PCI has been shown to be an effective method for conducting coronary interventions.It has further benefits of more accurate lesion measurement,improved stent deployment,reduced incidence of geographic miss and reduction of operator radiation exposure.Methods This single center evaluation enrolled 10 consecutive patients who had been selected for PCI.Clinical success was defined as residual stenosis<30%and no in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events.Learning curve effect was assessed by comparing efficiency metrics of early vs.later cases.Results Eleven lesions were treated all successfully without manual interruption or MACE events.Most lesions(63%)were ACC/AHA class B2 and C.Mean procedure time was 57.7±26.4 min,however two procedures were part of live demonstrations.Excluding the two live cases,the mean procedure time was 51.8±23.7 min.Procedural efficiency tended to improve from early cases to later cases based on PCI time(48.3±32.9 vs.25.5±13.0 min,P=0.27),fluoroscopy time(20.3±8.2 vs.12.5±4.6 min,P=0.16),contrast volume(145.0±28.9 vs.102.5±17.1 mL,P=0.05)and Air Kerma dose(1932±978 vs.1007±70 mGy,P=0.31).Conclusions Second generation robotic PCI was safe,effective and there were trends toward improvements in procedural efficiency during this early experience in China.
文摘Background: Approximately 70% patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) presented without ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram. Patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) often presented with atypical symptoms, which may be related to pre-hospital delay and increased risk of mortality. However, up to date few studies reported detailed symptomatology of NSTEMI, particularly among Asian patients. The objective of this study was to describe and compare symptoms and presenting characteristics of NSTEMI vs. STEMI patients. Methods: We enrolled 21,994 patients diagnosed with AMI from China Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) Registry between January 2013 and September 2014. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to ST-segment elevation: ST-segment elevation (STEMI) group and NSTEMI group. We extracted data on patients' characteristics and detailed symptomatology and compared these variables between two groups. Results: Compared with patients with STEMI (N=16,315), those with NSTEMI (N=5679) were older, more often females and more often have comorbidities. Patients with NSTEMI were less likely to present with persistent chest pain (54.3% vs.71.4%), diaphoresis (48.6% vs.70.0%), radiation pain (26.4% vs.33.8%), and more likely to have chest distress (42.4% vs.38.3%) than STEMI patients (all P<0.0001). Patients with NSTEMI were also had longer time to hospital. In multivariable analysis, NSTEMI was independent predictor of presentation without chest pain (odds ratio: 1.974, 95% confidence interval:1.849-2.107). Conclusions: Patients with NSTEMI were more likely to present with chest distress and pre-hospital patient delay compared with patients with STEMI. It is necessary for both clinicians and patients to learn more about atypical symptoms of NSTEMI in order to rapidly recognize myocardial infarction.
文摘Background:Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI)who present without typical chest pain are associated with a poor outcome.However,whether angiographic characteristics are related to a higher risk of mortality in this population is unclear.This study aimed to investigate whether the higher mortality risk in patients with STEMI without chest pain could be explained by their"high-risk"angiographic characteristics.Methods:We used data of 12,145 patients with STEMI who was registered in China Acute Myocardial Infarction registry from January 2013 to September 2014.We compared the infarct-related artery(IRA),thrombolysis in myocardial infarction(TIMI)flow grade in the IRA,and other angiographic characteristics between patients without and those with chest pain.Multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify independent risk factor of in-hospital mortality.Results:The 2922(24.1%)patients with STEMI presented without typical chest pain.These patients had a higher TIMI flow grade(mean TIMI flow grade:1.00 vs.0.94,P=0.02)and a lower rate of IRA disease of the left anterior descending artery(44.6%vs.51.2%,χ^2=35.63,P<0.01)than did those with typical chest pain.Patients without chest pain were older,more likely to have diabetes,longer time to hospital and higher Killip classification,and less likely to receive optimal medication treatment and primary percutaneous coronary intervention and higher In-hospital mortality(3.3%vs.2.2%,χ^2=10.57,P<0.01).After adjusting for multi-variables,presentation without chest pain was still an independent predictor of in-hospital death among patients with STEMI(adjusted odds ratio:1.36,95%confidence interval:1.02–1.83).Conclusions:Presentation without chest pain is common and associated with a higher in-hospital mortality risk in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Our results indicate that their poor prognosis is associated with baseline patient characteristics and delayed treatment,but not angiographic lesion characteristics.Clinical trial registration:NCT01874691,https://clinicaltrials.gov.