The introduction of capsule endoscopy (CE) in clinical practice increased the interest for the study of the small-bowel. Consequently, in about 10 years, an impressive quantity of literature on indications, diagnostic...The introduction of capsule endoscopy (CE) in clinical practice increased the interest for the study of the small-bowel. Consequently, in about 10 years, an impressive quantity of literature on indications, diagnostic yield (DY), safety profile and technical evolution of CE has been published as well as several reviews. At present time, there are 5 small-bowel capsule enteroscopy (SBCE) models in the worldwide market. Head-to-head trials have showed in the great majority of studies comparable results in terms of DY, image quality and completion rate. CE meta-analyses formed the basis of national/international guidelines; these guidelines place CE in a prime position for the diagnostic work-up of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, known and/or suspected Crohn's disease and possible small-bowel neoplasia. A 2-L polyethylene glycol-based purge, administered the day before the procedure,is the most widely practiced preparation regimen. Whether this regimen can be further improved (i.e. , by further decreasing its volume, changing the timing of administration, coupling it with prokinetics and/or other factors) or if it can really affect the DY, is still under discussion. Faecal calprotectin has been used in SBCE studies in two settings: in patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, to evaluate the type and extent of mucosal damage and, more importantly from a clinical point of view, in patients with known or suspected Crohn's disease for assessment of inflam-mation activity. Although there is still a lot of debate around the exact reasons of SBCE poor performance in various small-bowel segments, it is worth to remember that the capsule progress is non-steerable, hence more rapid in the proximal than in lower segments of the small-bowel. Capsule aspiration, a relatively unexpected complication, has been reported with increasing frequency. This is probably related with the increase in the mean age of patients undergoing CE. CE video review is a time-consuming procedure. Therefore, several attempts have been made to develop technical software features, in order to make CE video analysis easier and shorter (without jeopardizing its accuracy). Suspected Blood Indicator, QuickView and Fujinon Intelligent Chromo Endoscopy are some of the software tools that have been checked in various clinical studies to date.展开更多
Until recently, diagnosis and management of small-bowel tumors were delayed by the diffi culty of access to the small bowel and the poor diagnostic capabilities of the available diagnostic techniques. An array of new ...Until recently, diagnosis and management of small-bowel tumors were delayed by the diffi culty of access to the small bowel and the poor diagnostic capabilities of the available diagnostic techniques. An array of new methods has recently been developed, increasing the possibility of detecting these tumors at an earlier stage. Capsule endoscopy (CE) appears to be an ideal tool to recognize the presence of neoplastic lesions along this organ, since it is non-invasive and enables the entire small bowel to be visualized. High- quality images of the small-bowel mucosa may be captured and small and ? at lesions recognized, without exposure to radiation. Recent studies on a large population of patients undergoing CE have reported small-bowel tumor frequency only slightly above that reported in previous surgical series (range, 1.6%-2.4%) and have also confirmed that the main clinical indication to CE in patients with small-bowel tumors is obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. The majority of tumors identified by CE are malignant; many were unsuspected and not found by other methods. However, it remains difficult to identify pathology and tumor type based on the lesion’s endoscopic appearance. Despite its limitations, CE provides crucial information leading in most cases to changes in subsequent patient management. Whether the use of CE in combination with other new diagnostic (MRI or multidetector CT enterography) and therapeutic (Push- and-pull enteroscopy) techniques will lead to earlier diagnosis and treatment of these neoplasms, ultimately resulting in a survival advantage and in cost savings,remains to be determined through carefully-designed studies.展开更多
AIMTo define the role of small-bowel transit time in the detection rate of significant small-bowel lesions.METHODSSmall-bowel capsule endoscopy records, prospectively collected from 30 participating centers in the Lom...AIMTo define the role of small-bowel transit time in the detection rate of significant small-bowel lesions.METHODSSmall-bowel capsule endoscopy records, prospectively collected from 30 participating centers in the Lombardy Registry from October 2011 to December 2013, were included in the study if the clinical indication was obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and the capsule reached the cecum. Based on capsule findings, we created two groups: P2 (significant findings) and P0-1 (normal/negligible findings). Groups were compared for age, gender, small-bowel transit time, type of instrument, modality of capsule performance (outpatients vs inpatients), bowel cleanliness, and center volume.RESULTSWe retrieved and scrutinized 1,433 out of 2,295 capsule endoscopy records (62.4%) fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Patients were 67 ± 15 years old, and 815 (57%) were males. In comparison with patients in the P0-1 group, those in the P2 group (n = 776, 54%) were older (P < 0.0001), had a longer small-bowel transit time (P = 0.0015), and were more frequently examined in low-volume centers (P < 0.001). Age and small-bowel transit time were correlated (P < 0.001), with age as the sole independent predictor on multivariable analysis. Findings of the P2 group were artero-venous malformations (54.5%), inflammatory (23.6%) and protruding (10.4%) lesions, and luminal blood (11.5%).CONCLUSIONIn this selected, prospectively collected cohort of small-bowel capsule endoscopy performed for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, a longer small-bowel transit time was associated with a higher detection rate of significant lesions, along with age and a low center volume, with age serving as an independent predictor.展开更多
Capsule endoscopy has revoluzionized the study of the small bowel by providing a reliable method to evaluate, endoscopically, the entire small bowel. In the last six years several papers have been published exploring ...Capsule endoscopy has revoluzionized the study of the small bowel by providing a reliable method to evaluate, endoscopically, the entire small bowel. In the last six years several papers have been published exploring the possible role of this examination in different clinical conditions. At the present time capsule endoscopy is generally recommended as a third examination, after negative bidirectional endoscopy, in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. A growing body of evidence suggests also an important role for this examination in other clinical conditions such as Crohn＇s disease, celiac disease, small bowel polyposis syndromes or small bowel tumors. The main complication of this examination is the retention of the device at the site of a previously unknown small bowel stricture. However there are also some other open issues mainly due to technical limitations of this tool （which is not driven from remote control, is unable to take biopsies, to insufflate air, to suck fluids or debris and sometimes to correctly size and locate lesions）.The recently developed double balloon enteroscope, owing to its capability to explore a large part of the small bowel and to take targeted biopsies, although being invasive and time consuming, can overcome some limitations of capsule endoscopy. At the present time, in the majority of clinical conditions （i.e. obscure GI bleeding）, the winning strategy seems to be to couple these two techniques to explore the small bowel in a painless, safe and complete way （with capsule endoscopy） and to define and treat the lesions identified （with double balloon enteroscopy）.展开更多
The investigation of small bowel morphology is often mandatory in many patients with Crohn's disease. Traditional radiological techniques (small bowel enteroclysis and small bowel follow-through) have long been th...The investigation of small bowel morphology is often mandatory in many patients with Crohn's disease. Traditional radiological techniques (small bowel enteroclysis and small bowel follow-through) have long been the only suitable methods for this purpose. In recent years, several alternative imaging techniques have been proposed. To review the most recent advances in imaging studies of the small bowel, with particular reference to their possible application in Crohn's disease, we conducted a complete review of the most important studies in which traditional and newer imaging methods were performed and compared in patients with Crohn's disease. Several radiological and endoscopic techniques are now available for the study of the small bowel; each of them is characterized by a distinct profile of favourable and unfavourable features. In some cases, they may also be used as complementary rather than alternative techniques. In everyday practice, the choice of the technique to be used stands upon its availability and a careful evaluation of diagnostic accuracy, clinical usefulness, safety and cost. The recent development ofinnovative imaging techniques has opened a new and exciting area in the exploration of the small bowel in Crohn's disease patients.展开更多
Currently,the major problem of all existing commercial capsule devices is the lack of control of movement.In the future,with an interface application,the clinician will be able to stop and direct the device into point...Currently,the major problem of all existing commercial capsule devices is the lack of control of movement.In the future,with an interface application,the clinician will be able to stop and direct the device into points of interest for detailed inspection/diagnosis,and therapy delivery.This editorial presents current commerciallyavailable new designs,European projects and delivery capsule and gives an overview of the progress required and progress that will be achieved-according to the opinion of the authors- in the next 5 year leading to 2020.展开更多
AIM:To evaluate the three-dimensional(3-D)representation performance of 4 publicly available Shapefrom-Shading(SfS)algorithms in small-bowel capsule endoscopy(SBCE).METHODS:SfS techniques recover the shape of objects ...AIM:To evaluate the three-dimensional(3-D)representation performance of 4 publicly available Shapefrom-Shading(SfS)algorithms in small-bowel capsule endoscopy(SBCE).METHODS:SfS techniques recover the shape of objects using the gradual variation of shading.There are4 publicly available SfS algorithms.To the best of our knowledge,no comparative study with images obtained during clinical SBCE has been performed to date.Three experienced reviewers were asked to evaluate 54 twodimensional(2-D)images(categories:protrusion/inflammation/vascular)transformed to 3-D by the aforementioned SfS 3-D algorithms.The best algorithm was selected and inter-rater agreement was calculated.RESULTS:Four publicly available SfS algorithms were compared.Tsai’s SfS algorithm outperformed the rest(selected as best performing in 45/54 SBCE images),followed by Ciuti’s algorithm(best performing in 7/54images)and Torre o’s(in 1/54 images).In 26/54 images;Tsai’s algorithm was unanimously selected as the best performing 3-D representation SfS software.Tsai’s 3-D algorithm superiority was independent of lesion category(protrusion/inflammatory/vascular;P=0.678)and/or CE system used to obtain the 2-D images(MiroCam/PillCam;P=0.558).Lastly,the interobserver agreement was good(kappa=0.55).CONCLUSION:3-D representation software offers a plausible alternative for 3-D representation of conventional capsule endoscopy images(until optics technology matures enough to allow hardware enabled-"real"3-D reconstruction of the gastrointestinal tract).展开更多
BACKGROUND Low-volume preparations for colonoscopy have shown similar efficacy compared to high-volume ones in randomized controlled trials(RCT).However,most RCTs do not provide data about clinical outcomes including ...BACKGROUND Low-volume preparations for colonoscopy have shown similar efficacy compared to high-volume ones in randomized controlled trials(RCT).However,most RCTs do not provide data about clinical outcomes including lesions detection rate.Moreover,real-life comparisons are lacking.AIM To compare efficacy(both in terms of adequate bowel preparation and detection of colorectal lesions)and tolerability of a high-volume(HV:4 L polyethylene glycol,PEG)and a low-volume(LV:2 L PEG plus bisacodyl)bowel preparation in a real-life setting.METHODS Consecutive outpatients referred for colonoscopy were prospectively enrolled between 1 December 2014 and 31 December 2016.Patients could choose either LV or HV preparation,with a day-before schedule for morning colonoscopies and a split-dose for afternoon procedures.Adequate bowel preparation according to Boston Bowel Preparation Scale(BBPS),clinical outcomes including polyp detection rate(PDR),adenoma detection rate(ADR),advanced adenoma detection rate(AADR),sessile/serrated lesion detection rate(SDR)and cancer detection rate and self-reported tolerability of HV and LV were blindly assessed.RESULTS Total 2040 patients were enrolled and 1815(mean age 60.6 years,50.2%men)finally included.LV was chosen by 52%of patients(50.8%of men,54.9%of women).Split-dose schedule was more common with HV(44.7%vs 38.2%,P=0.005).High-definition scopes were used in 33.4%of patients,without difference in the two groups(P=0.605).HV and LV preparations showed similar adequate bowel preparation rates(89.2%vs 86.6%,P=0.098),also considering the two different schedules(HV split-dose 93.8%vs LV split-dose 93.6%,P=1;HV daybefore 85.5%vs LV day-before 82.3%,P=0.182).Mean global BBPS score was higher for HV preparations(7.1±1.7 vs 6.8±1.6,P<0.001).After adjustment for sex,age and indications for colonoscopy,HV preparation resulted higher in PDR[Odds ratio(OR)1.32,95%CI:1.07-1.63,P=0.011]and ADR(OR 1.29,95%CI 1.02–1.63,P=0.038)and comparable to LV in AADR(OR 1.51,95%CI 0.97-2.35,P=0.069),SDR and cancer detection rate.The use of standard-definition colonoscopes was associated to lower PDR(adjusted OR 1.59,95%CI:1.22-2.08,P<0.001),ADR(adjusted OR 1.71,95%CI:1.26–2.30,P<0.001)and AADR(adjusted OR 1.97,95%CI:1.09-3.56,P=0.025)in patients receiving LV preparation.Mean Visual Analogue Scale tolerability scored equally(7,P=0.627)but a≥75%dose intake was more frequent with LV(94.6%vs 92.1%,P=0.003).CONCLUSION In a real-life setting,PEG-based low-volume preparation with bisacodyl showed similar efficacy and tolerability compared to standard HV preparation.However,with higher PDR and ADR,HV should still be considered as the reference standard for clinical trials and the preferred option in screening colonoscopy,especially when colonoscopy is performed with standard resolution imaging.展开更多
文摘The introduction of capsule endoscopy (CE) in clinical practice increased the interest for the study of the small-bowel. Consequently, in about 10 years, an impressive quantity of literature on indications, diagnostic yield (DY), safety profile and technical evolution of CE has been published as well as several reviews. At present time, there are 5 small-bowel capsule enteroscopy (SBCE) models in the worldwide market. Head-to-head trials have showed in the great majority of studies comparable results in terms of DY, image quality and completion rate. CE meta-analyses formed the basis of national/international guidelines; these guidelines place CE in a prime position for the diagnostic work-up of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, known and/or suspected Crohn's disease and possible small-bowel neoplasia. A 2-L polyethylene glycol-based purge, administered the day before the procedure,is the most widely practiced preparation regimen. Whether this regimen can be further improved (i.e. , by further decreasing its volume, changing the timing of administration, coupling it with prokinetics and/or other factors) or if it can really affect the DY, is still under discussion. Faecal calprotectin has been used in SBCE studies in two settings: in patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, to evaluate the type and extent of mucosal damage and, more importantly from a clinical point of view, in patients with known or suspected Crohn's disease for assessment of inflam-mation activity. Although there is still a lot of debate around the exact reasons of SBCE poor performance in various small-bowel segments, it is worth to remember that the capsule progress is non-steerable, hence more rapid in the proximal than in lower segments of the small-bowel. Capsule aspiration, a relatively unexpected complication, has been reported with increasing frequency. This is probably related with the increase in the mean age of patients undergoing CE. CE video review is a time-consuming procedure. Therefore, several attempts have been made to develop technical software features, in order to make CE video analysis easier and shorter (without jeopardizing its accuracy). Suspected Blood Indicator, QuickView and Fujinon Intelligent Chromo Endoscopy are some of the software tools that have been checked in various clinical studies to date.
文摘Until recently, diagnosis and management of small-bowel tumors were delayed by the diffi culty of access to the small bowel and the poor diagnostic capabilities of the available diagnostic techniques. An array of new methods has recently been developed, increasing the possibility of detecting these tumors at an earlier stage. Capsule endoscopy (CE) appears to be an ideal tool to recognize the presence of neoplastic lesions along this organ, since it is non-invasive and enables the entire small bowel to be visualized. High- quality images of the small-bowel mucosa may be captured and small and ? at lesions recognized, without exposure to radiation. Recent studies on a large population of patients undergoing CE have reported small-bowel tumor frequency only slightly above that reported in previous surgical series (range, 1.6%-2.4%) and have also confirmed that the main clinical indication to CE in patients with small-bowel tumors is obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. The majority of tumors identified by CE are malignant; many were unsuspected and not found by other methods. However, it remains difficult to identify pathology and tumor type based on the lesion’s endoscopic appearance. Despite its limitations, CE provides crucial information leading in most cases to changes in subsequent patient management. Whether the use of CE in combination with other new diagnostic (MRI or multidetector CT enterography) and therapeutic (Push- and-pull enteroscopy) techniques will lead to earlier diagnosis and treatment of these neoplasms, ultimately resulting in a survival advantage and in cost savings,remains to be determined through carefully-designed studies.
文摘AIMTo define the role of small-bowel transit time in the detection rate of significant small-bowel lesions.METHODSSmall-bowel capsule endoscopy records, prospectively collected from 30 participating centers in the Lombardy Registry from October 2011 to December 2013, were included in the study if the clinical indication was obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and the capsule reached the cecum. Based on capsule findings, we created two groups: P2 (significant findings) and P0-1 (normal/negligible findings). Groups were compared for age, gender, small-bowel transit time, type of instrument, modality of capsule performance (outpatients vs inpatients), bowel cleanliness, and center volume.RESULTSWe retrieved and scrutinized 1,433 out of 2,295 capsule endoscopy records (62.4%) fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Patients were 67 ± 15 years old, and 815 (57%) were males. In comparison with patients in the P0-1 group, those in the P2 group (n = 776, 54%) were older (P < 0.0001), had a longer small-bowel transit time (P = 0.0015), and were more frequently examined in low-volume centers (P < 0.001). Age and small-bowel transit time were correlated (P < 0.001), with age as the sole independent predictor on multivariable analysis. Findings of the P2 group were artero-venous malformations (54.5%), inflammatory (23.6%) and protruding (10.4%) lesions, and luminal blood (11.5%).CONCLUSIONIn this selected, prospectively collected cohort of small-bowel capsule endoscopy performed for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, a longer small-bowel transit time was associated with a higher detection rate of significant lesions, along with age and a low center volume, with age serving as an independent predictor.
文摘Capsule endoscopy has revoluzionized the study of the small bowel by providing a reliable method to evaluate, endoscopically, the entire small bowel. In the last six years several papers have been published exploring the possible role of this examination in different clinical conditions. At the present time capsule endoscopy is generally recommended as a third examination, after negative bidirectional endoscopy, in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. A growing body of evidence suggests also an important role for this examination in other clinical conditions such as Crohn＇s disease, celiac disease, small bowel polyposis syndromes or small bowel tumors. The main complication of this examination is the retention of the device at the site of a previously unknown small bowel stricture. However there are also some other open issues mainly due to technical limitations of this tool （which is not driven from remote control, is unable to take biopsies, to insufflate air, to suck fluids or debris and sometimes to correctly size and locate lesions）.The recently developed double balloon enteroscope, owing to its capability to explore a large part of the small bowel and to take targeted biopsies, although being invasive and time consuming, can overcome some limitations of capsule endoscopy. At the present time, in the majority of clinical conditions （i.e. obscure GI bleeding）, the winning strategy seems to be to couple these two techniques to explore the small bowel in a painless, safe and complete way （with capsule endoscopy） and to define and treat the lesions identified （with double balloon enteroscopy）.
文摘The investigation of small bowel morphology is often mandatory in many patients with Crohn's disease. Traditional radiological techniques (small bowel enteroclysis and small bowel follow-through) have long been the only suitable methods for this purpose. In recent years, several alternative imaging techniques have been proposed. To review the most recent advances in imaging studies of the small bowel, with particular reference to their possible application in Crohn's disease, we conducted a complete review of the most important studies in which traditional and newer imaging methods were performed and compared in patients with Crohn's disease. Several radiological and endoscopic techniques are now available for the study of the small bowel; each of them is characterized by a distinct profile of favourable and unfavourable features. In some cases, they may also be used as complementary rather than alternative techniques. In everyday practice, the choice of the technique to be used stands upon its availability and a careful evaluation of diagnostic accuracy, clinical usefulness, safety and cost. The recent development ofinnovative imaging techniques has opened a new and exciting area in the exploration of the small bowel in Crohn's disease patients.
文摘Currently,the major problem of all existing commercial capsule devices is the lack of control of movement.In the future,with an interface application,the clinician will be able to stop and direct the device into points of interest for detailed inspection/diagnosis,and therapy delivery.This editorial presents current commerciallyavailable new designs,European projects and delivery capsule and gives an overview of the progress required and progress that will be achieved-according to the opinion of the authors- in the next 5 year leading to 2020.
文摘AIM:To evaluate the three-dimensional(3-D)representation performance of 4 publicly available Shapefrom-Shading(SfS)algorithms in small-bowel capsule endoscopy(SBCE).METHODS:SfS techniques recover the shape of objects using the gradual variation of shading.There are4 publicly available SfS algorithms.To the best of our knowledge,no comparative study with images obtained during clinical SBCE has been performed to date.Three experienced reviewers were asked to evaluate 54 twodimensional(2-D)images(categories:protrusion/inflammation/vascular)transformed to 3-D by the aforementioned SfS 3-D algorithms.The best algorithm was selected and inter-rater agreement was calculated.RESULTS:Four publicly available SfS algorithms were compared.Tsai’s SfS algorithm outperformed the rest(selected as best performing in 45/54 SBCE images),followed by Ciuti’s algorithm(best performing in 7/54images)and Torre o’s(in 1/54 images).In 26/54 images;Tsai’s algorithm was unanimously selected as the best performing 3-D representation SfS software.Tsai’s 3-D algorithm superiority was independent of lesion category(protrusion/inflammatory/vascular;P=0.678)and/or CE system used to obtain the 2-D images(MiroCam/PillCam;P=0.558).Lastly,the interobserver agreement was good(kappa=0.55).CONCLUSION:3-D representation software offers a plausible alternative for 3-D representation of conventional capsule endoscopy images(until optics technology matures enough to allow hardware enabled-"real"3-D reconstruction of the gastrointestinal tract).
文摘BACKGROUND Low-volume preparations for colonoscopy have shown similar efficacy compared to high-volume ones in randomized controlled trials(RCT).However,most RCTs do not provide data about clinical outcomes including lesions detection rate.Moreover,real-life comparisons are lacking.AIM To compare efficacy(both in terms of adequate bowel preparation and detection of colorectal lesions)and tolerability of a high-volume(HV:4 L polyethylene glycol,PEG)and a low-volume(LV:2 L PEG plus bisacodyl)bowel preparation in a real-life setting.METHODS Consecutive outpatients referred for colonoscopy were prospectively enrolled between 1 December 2014 and 31 December 2016.Patients could choose either LV or HV preparation,with a day-before schedule for morning colonoscopies and a split-dose for afternoon procedures.Adequate bowel preparation according to Boston Bowel Preparation Scale(BBPS),clinical outcomes including polyp detection rate(PDR),adenoma detection rate(ADR),advanced adenoma detection rate(AADR),sessile/serrated lesion detection rate(SDR)and cancer detection rate and self-reported tolerability of HV and LV were blindly assessed.RESULTS Total 2040 patients were enrolled and 1815(mean age 60.6 years,50.2%men)finally included.LV was chosen by 52%of patients(50.8%of men,54.9%of women).Split-dose schedule was more common with HV(44.7%vs 38.2%,P=0.005).High-definition scopes were used in 33.4%of patients,without difference in the two groups(P=0.605).HV and LV preparations showed similar adequate bowel preparation rates(89.2%vs 86.6%,P=0.098),also considering the two different schedules(HV split-dose 93.8%vs LV split-dose 93.6%,P=1;HV daybefore 85.5%vs LV day-before 82.3%,P=0.182).Mean global BBPS score was higher for HV preparations(7.1±1.7 vs 6.8±1.6,P<0.001).After adjustment for sex,age and indications for colonoscopy,HV preparation resulted higher in PDR[Odds ratio(OR)1.32,95%CI:1.07-1.63,P=0.011]and ADR(OR 1.29,95%CI 1.02–1.63,P=0.038)and comparable to LV in AADR(OR 1.51,95%CI 0.97-2.35,P=0.069),SDR and cancer detection rate.The use of standard-definition colonoscopes was associated to lower PDR(adjusted OR 1.59,95%CI:1.22-2.08,P<0.001),ADR(adjusted OR 1.71,95%CI:1.26–2.30,P<0.001)and AADR(adjusted OR 1.97,95%CI:1.09-3.56,P=0.025)in patients receiving LV preparation.Mean Visual Analogue Scale tolerability scored equally(7,P=0.627)but a≥75%dose intake was more frequent with LV(94.6%vs 92.1%,P=0.003).CONCLUSION In a real-life setting,PEG-based low-volume preparation with bisacodyl showed similar efficacy and tolerability compared to standard HV preparation.However,with higher PDR and ADR,HV should still be considered as the reference standard for clinical trials and the preferred option in screening colonoscopy,especially when colonoscopy is performed with standard resolution imaging.
