Objective:To compare clinical pregnancy rates following sequential day-3 and day-5 embryo transfer with double or sequential cleavage-stage transfers.Methods:This study enrolled 242 patients undergoing gonadotropin-re...Objective:To compare clinical pregnancy rates following sequential day-3 and day-5 embryo transfer with double or sequential cleavage-stage transfers.Methods:This study enrolled 242 patients undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol and fresh embryo transfer.Basal follicle stimulating hormone,luteinizing hormone,serum estradiol and anti-Müllerian hormone levels and controlled ovarian stimulation outcomes were noted.Of 242 women,135 underwent double embryo transfer on day 2 or day 3(the double group),54 women underwent sequential embryo transfer on day 2 and day 3(the D2/D3 group),and 53 underwent sequential embryo transfer on day 3 and day 5(the D3/D5 group).Clinical pregnancy rates were compared among the groups.Results:Female age,body mass index,basal follicle stimulating hormone,luteinizing hormone and estradiol levels were similar among the groups(P>0.05).The D3/D5 group had a significantly higher number of metaphaseⅡoocytes,fertilized oocytes and good quality embryos on day 3 compared with the double group and the D2/D3 group(P<0.001).Clinical pregnancy rates in the double,D2/D3 and D3/D5 groups were 26.6%(36/135),16.6%(9/54)and 37.7%(20/53),respectively.There was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rates between the double group and the D2/D3 group(P=0.204)or the D3/D5 group(P=0.188).The D3/D5 group had significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates compared with the D2/D3 group(P=0.025).Conclusions:Sequential cleavage-stage transfer(D2/D3)or cleavage stage and blastocyst transfer(D3/D5)does not improve clinical pregnancy rates compared with double cleavage-stage embryo transfer.Although sequential transfer seems to be an effective option in certain patient populations,routine application of this technique might not be a suitable approach in an unselected population to improve assisted reproductive technology outcomes.展开更多
Background: Obesity and overweight negatively affect fertility. Protocols need?to be developed in ART treatments for obese and overweight women. Objectives: To investigate the effect of recombinant luteinizing hormone...Background: Obesity and overweight negatively affect fertility. Protocols need?to be developed in ART treatments for obese and overweight women. Objectives: To investigate the effect of recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) addition to recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) on treatment outcomes?in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) cycles in obese and overweight women without polycystic ovary syndrome. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was carried out in Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Assisted Reproductive Techniques Clinic between January 2016 and March 2019. To analyze the impact of rLH addition to rFSH in GnRH antagonist cycles in overweight and obese, the patients were divided into four groups according to body mass index (BMI) and gonadotropin type;Group 1: patients with BMI ≥ 25 stimulated with rFSH alone (n: 37), Group 2: patients with BMI ≥ 25 stimulated with rFSH + rLH (n: 37), Group 3: patients with BMI between 18.5 - 24.99 stimulated with rFSH alone (n: 33), Group 4: patients with BMI between 18.5 and 24.99 stimulated with rFSH + rLH (n: 30). Patients with polycystic ovary syndrome were excluded. Results: Basal LH levels were found to be significantly lower in obese and overweight patients compared to normoweight patients (p = 0.01). Grade 1 embryo ratio in obese and overweight patients was higher in rLH added obese group than in group LH not included (64.9%, p = 0.005). Ongoing pregnancy rates (OPR) in obese and overweight patients were significantly higher in rLH added group compared to rFSH only group (43.2% vs 18.9% respectively, p = 0.044). However, OPR did not differ significantly in rLH added and rFSH only groups in normoweight patients (p = 0.588). Conclusion: This study has shown that obese and overweight non-PCOS patients have lower endogenous LH levels. It has also shown that rLH supplementation in GnRH antagonist cycles in obese and overweight women improves embryo quality and ongoing pregnancy rates. However rLH addition to rFSH doesn’t seem to have a value in normoweight patients.展开更多
文摘Objective:To compare clinical pregnancy rates following sequential day-3 and day-5 embryo transfer with double or sequential cleavage-stage transfers.Methods:This study enrolled 242 patients undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol and fresh embryo transfer.Basal follicle stimulating hormone,luteinizing hormone,serum estradiol and anti-Müllerian hormone levels and controlled ovarian stimulation outcomes were noted.Of 242 women,135 underwent double embryo transfer on day 2 or day 3(the double group),54 women underwent sequential embryo transfer on day 2 and day 3(the D2/D3 group),and 53 underwent sequential embryo transfer on day 3 and day 5(the D3/D5 group).Clinical pregnancy rates were compared among the groups.Results:Female age,body mass index,basal follicle stimulating hormone,luteinizing hormone and estradiol levels were similar among the groups(P>0.05).The D3/D5 group had a significantly higher number of metaphaseⅡoocytes,fertilized oocytes and good quality embryos on day 3 compared with the double group and the D2/D3 group(P<0.001).Clinical pregnancy rates in the double,D2/D3 and D3/D5 groups were 26.6%(36/135),16.6%(9/54)and 37.7%(20/53),respectively.There was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rates between the double group and the D2/D3 group(P=0.204)or the D3/D5 group(P=0.188).The D3/D5 group had significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates compared with the D2/D3 group(P=0.025).Conclusions:Sequential cleavage-stage transfer(D2/D3)or cleavage stage and blastocyst transfer(D3/D5)does not improve clinical pregnancy rates compared with double cleavage-stage embryo transfer.Although sequential transfer seems to be an effective option in certain patient populations,routine application of this technique might not be a suitable approach in an unselected population to improve assisted reproductive technology outcomes.
文摘Background: Obesity and overweight negatively affect fertility. Protocols need?to be developed in ART treatments for obese and overweight women. Objectives: To investigate the effect of recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) addition to recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) on treatment outcomes?in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) cycles in obese and overweight women without polycystic ovary syndrome. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was carried out in Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Assisted Reproductive Techniques Clinic between January 2016 and March 2019. To analyze the impact of rLH addition to rFSH in GnRH antagonist cycles in overweight and obese, the patients were divided into four groups according to body mass index (BMI) and gonadotropin type;Group 1: patients with BMI ≥ 25 stimulated with rFSH alone (n: 37), Group 2: patients with BMI ≥ 25 stimulated with rFSH + rLH (n: 37), Group 3: patients with BMI between 18.5 - 24.99 stimulated with rFSH alone (n: 33), Group 4: patients with BMI between 18.5 and 24.99 stimulated with rFSH + rLH (n: 30). Patients with polycystic ovary syndrome were excluded. Results: Basal LH levels were found to be significantly lower in obese and overweight patients compared to normoweight patients (p = 0.01). Grade 1 embryo ratio in obese and overweight patients was higher in rLH added obese group than in group LH not included (64.9%, p = 0.005). Ongoing pregnancy rates (OPR) in obese and overweight patients were significantly higher in rLH added group compared to rFSH only group (43.2% vs 18.9% respectively, p = 0.044). However, OPR did not differ significantly in rLH added and rFSH only groups in normoweight patients (p = 0.588). Conclusion: This study has shown that obese and overweight non-PCOS patients have lower endogenous LH levels. It has also shown that rLH supplementation in GnRH antagonist cycles in obese and overweight women improves embryo quality and ongoing pregnancy rates. However rLH addition to rFSH doesn’t seem to have a value in normoweight patients.