Hepatolithiasis:Epidemiology,presentation,classification and management of a complex disease

The term hepatolithiasis describes the presence of biliary stones within the intrahepatic bile ducts,above the hilar confluence of the hepatic ducts.The disease is more prevalent in Asia,mainly owing to socioeconomic and dietary factors,as well as the prevalence of biliary parasites.In the last century,owing to migration,its global incidence has increased.The main pathophysiological mechanisms involve cholangitis,bile infection and biliary strictures,creating a self-sustaining cycle that perpetuates the disease,frequently characterised by recurrent episodes of bacterial infection referred to as syndrome of“recurrent pyogenic cholangitis”.Furthermore,long-standing hepatolithiasis is a known risk factor for development of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Various classifications have aimed at providing useful insight of clinically relevant aspects and guidance for treatment.The management of symptomatic patients and those with complications can be complex,and relies upon a multidisciplinary team of hepatologists,endoscopists,interventional radiologists and hepatobiliary surgeons,with the main goal being to offer relief from the clinical presentations and prevent the development of more serious complications.This comprehensive review provides insight on various aspects of hepatolithiasis,with a focus on epidemiology,new evidence on pathophysiology,most important clinical aspects,different classification systems and contemporary management.

Palliative long-term abdominal drains vs large volume paracenteses for the management of refractory ascites in end-stage liver disease

BACKGROUND Long-term abdominal drains(LTAD)are a cost-effective palliative measure to manage malignant ascites in the community,but their use in patients with end-stage chronic liver disease and refractory ascites is not routine practice.The safety and cost-effectiveness of LTAD are currently being studied in this setting,with preliminary positive results.We hypothesised that palliative LTAD are as effective and safe as repeat palliative large volume paracentesis(LVP)in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites and may offer advantages in patients’quality of life.AIM To compare the effectiveness and safety of palliative LTAD and LVP in refractory ascites secondary to end-stage chronic liver disease.METHODS A retrospective,observational cohort study comparing the effectiveness and safety outcomes of palliative LTAD and regular palliative LVP as a treatment for refractory ascites in consecutive patients with end-stage chronic liver disease followed-up at our United Kingdom tertiary centre between 2018 and 2022 was conducted.Fisher’s exact tests and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare qualitative and quantitative variables,respectively.Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were generated to stratify time-related outcomes according to the type of drain.RESULTS Thirty patients had a total of 35 indwelling abdominal drains and nineteen patients underwent regular LVP.The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups.Prophylactic antibiotics were more frequently prescribed in patients with LTAD(P=0.012),while the incidence of peritonitis did not differ between the two groups(P=0.46).The incidence of acute kidney injury(P=0.014)and ascites/drain-related hospital admissions(P=0.004)were significantly higher in the LVP group.The overall survival was similar in the two groups(log-rank P=0.26),but the endpoint-free survival was significantly shorter in the LVP group(P=0.003,P<0.001,P=0.018 for first ascites/drain-related admission,acute kidney injury and drain-related complications,respectively).CONCLUSION The use of LTAD in the management of refractory ascites in palliated end-stage liver disease is effective,safe,and may reduce hospital admissions and utilisation of healthcare resources compared to LVP.

Pancreatic surgery and tertiary pancreatitis services warrant provision for support from a specialist diabetes team

Pancreatic surgery units undertake several complex operations,albeit with consi-derable morbidity and mortality,as is the case for the management of complicated acute pancreatitis or chronic pancreatitis.The centralisation of pancreatic surgery services,with the development of designated large-volume centres,has contribu-ted to significantly improved outcomes.In this editorial,we discuss the complex associations between diabetes mellitus(DM)and pancreatic/periampullary disease in the context of pancreatic surgery and overall management of complex pancreatitis,highlighting the consequential needs and the indispensable role of specialist diabetes teams in support of tertiary pancreatic services.Type 3c pan-creatogenic DM,refers to DM developing in the setting of exocrine pancreatic disease,and its identification and management can be challenging,while the glycaemic control of such patients may affect their course of treatment and outcome.Adequate preoperative diabetes assessment is warranted to aid identification of patients who are likely to need commencement or escalation of glucose lowering therapy in the postoperative period.The incidence of new onset diabetes after pancreatic resection is widely variable in the literature,and depends on the type and extent of pancreatic resection,as is the case with pancreatic parenchymal loss in the context of severe pancreatitis.Early involvement of a specialist diabetes team is essential to ensure a holistic management.In the current era,large volume pancreatic surgery services commonly abide by the principles of enhanced recovery after surgery,with inclusion of provisions for optimisation of the perioperative glycaemic control,to improve outcomes.While various guidelines are available to aid perioperative management of DM,auditing and quality improvement platforms have highlighted deficiencies in the perioperative management of diabetic patients and areas of required improvement.The need for perioperative support of diabetic patients by specialist diabetes teams is uniformly underlined,a fact that becomes clearly more prominent at all different stages in the setting of pancreatic surgery and the management of complex pancreatitis.Therefore,pancreatic surgery and tertiary pancreatitis services must be designed with a provision for support from specialist diabetes teams.With the ongoing accumulation of evidence,it would be reasonable to consider the design of specific guidelines for the glycaemic management of these patients.

Hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus dual infection

Hepatitis B virus(HBV)and hepatitis C virus(HCV)share common mode of transmission and both are able to induce a chronic infection.Dual HBV/HCV chronic coinfection is a fairly frequent occurrence,especially in high endemic areas and among individuals at high risk of parenterally transmitted infections.The intracellular interplay between HBV and HCV has not yet been sufficiently clarified,also due to the lack of a proper in vitro cellular model.Longitudinal evaluation of serum HBV DNA and HCV RNA amounts has revealed that complex virological profiles may be present in coinfected patients.Dual HBV/HCV infection has been associated to a severe course of the liver disease and to a high risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma.Despite the clinical importance,solid evidence and clear guidelines for treatment of this special population are still lacking.This review summarizes the available data on the virological and clinical features as well as the therapeutic options of the dual HBV/HCV infection,and highlights the aspects that need to be better clarified.

Review of incidence and outcomes of treatment of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis(PSC)is a premalignant condition and a welldocumented risk factor for cholangiocarcinoma(CCA)which is the most common malignancy in this setting and the leading cause of deaths in the recent years,with an increasing incidence.PSC-associated CCA has a geographical distribution that follows the incidence of PSC,with an observed ascending gradient from the Eastern to the Western and from the Southern to the Northern countries.It may arise at any location along the biliary tree but is most common in the perihilar area.Patients with PSC and intrahepatic or perihilar CCA are typically not suitable for liver resection,which is otherwise the treatment of choice with curative intent in patients with resectable tumours,providing a radical resection with clear margins can be achieved.This largely relates to the commonly advanced stage of liver disease at presentation,which allows consideration for liver resection only for a very limited number of suitable patients with PSC.On the other hand,remarkable progress has been reached in the last decades with the implementation of a protocol combining neoadjuvant chemoradiation and orthotopic liver transplantation(OLT)for the treatment of perihilar CCA,within specific criteria.Excellent results have been achieved particularly for PSC patients with this cancer,who seem to benefit the most from this treatment,having converted this into an accepted indication for transplantation and the standard of care in several experienced centres.Intrahepatic CCA as an indication for OLT remains controversial and has not been accepted given disappointing previous results.However,as recent studies have shown favourable outcomes in early intrahepatic CCA,it may be that under defined criteria,OLT may play a more prominent role in the future.Distal CCA in the context of PSC requires aggressive surgical treatment with curative intent,when feasible.This review provides insight about particular features of CCA in the setting of PSC,with a main focus on its incidence,considerations relating to its anatomical location and implications to treatment and outcomes,through the viewpoint of historical evolution of management,and future perspectives.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis and cholangiocarcinoma:the 2023 practice guidance and future perspectives

The 2023 practice guidance on primary sclerosing cholangitis(PSC)and cholangiocarcinoma(CCA)of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases(AASLD)came as a needful update to the previous 2010 guidelines on PSC,with a first-time inclusion of dedicated guidance on the diagnosis and management of CCA(1,2).This data-supported approach developed by consensus of an expert panel,provides guidance statements based on analytical review of the relevant literature.