Imaging of the small bowel in Crohn's disease: A review of old and new techniques

The investigation of small bowel morphology is often mandatory in many patients with Crohn's disease. Traditional radiological techniques (small bowel enteroclysis and small bowel follow-through) have long been the only suitable methods for this purpose. In recent years, several alternative imaging techniques have been proposed. To review the most recent advances in imaging studies of the small bowel, with particular reference to their possible application in Crohn's disease, we conducted a complete review of the most important studies in which traditional and newer imaging methods were performed and compared in patients with Crohn's disease. Several radiological and endoscopic techniques are now available for the study of the small bowel; each of them is characterized by a distinct profile of favourable and unfavourable features. In some cases, they may also be used as complementary rather than alternative techniques. In everyday practice, the choice of the technique to be used stands upon its availability and a careful evaluation of diagnostic accuracy, clinical usefulness, safety and cost. The recent development ofinnovative imaging techniques has opened a new and exciting area in the exploration of the small bowel in Crohn's disease patients.

Reporting rotator cuff tears on magnetic resonance arthrography using the Snyder's arthroscopic classification

AIM To determine diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance arthrography(MRA) in evaluating rotator cuff tears(RCTs) using Snyder's classification for reporting.METHODS One hundred and twenty-six patients(64 males, 62 females; median age 55 years) underwent shoulder MRA and arthroscopy, which represented our reference standard. Surgical arthroscopic reports were reviewed and the reported Snyder's classification was recorded. MRA examinations were evaluated by two independent radiologists(14 and 5 years' experience) using Snyder's classification system, blinded to arthroscopy. Agreement between arthroscopy and MRA on partial-and fullthickness tears was calculated, first regardless of their extent. Then, analysis took into account also the extent of the tear. Interobserver agreement was also calculated the quadratically-weighted Cohen kappa statistics.RESULTS On arthroscopy, 71/126 patients(56%) had a fullthickness RCT. The remaining 55/126 patients(44%) had a partial-thickness RCT. Regardless of tear extent, out of 71 patients with arthroscopically-confirmed fullthickness RCTs, 66(93%) were correctly scored by both readers. All 55 patients with arthroscopic diagnosis of partial-thickness RCT were correctly assigned as having a partial-thickness RCT at MRA by both readers. Interobserver reproducibility analysis showed total agreement between the two readers in distinguishing partial-thickness from full-thickness RCTs, regardless of tear extent(k = 1.000). With regard to tear extent, in patients in whom a complete tear was correctly diagnosed, correct tear extent was detected in 61/66 cases(92%); in the remaining 5/66 cases(8%), tear extent was underestimated. Agreement was k = 0.955. Interobserver agreement was total(k = 1.000).CONCLUSION MRA shows high diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility in evaluating RCTs using the Snyder's classification for reporting. Snyder's classification may be adopted for routine reporting of MRA.

Relevant incidental findings at abdominal multi-detector contrast-enhanced computed tomography:A collateral screening?

AIM: To investigate the prevalence of relevant incidental findings(RIFs) detected during routine abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography(Ce CT).METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the reports of a consecutive series of abdominal Ce CT studies performed between January and May 2013. For each report, patients' age and sex, admission as inpatient or outpatient, clinical suspicion as indicated by the requesting physician, availability of a previous abdominal examination, and name of the reporting radiologist were recorded. Based on the clinical suspicion, the presence and features of any RIFs(if needing additional workup) was noted.RESULTS: One thousand forty abdominal Ce CT were performed in 949 patients(528 males, mean age 66 ±14 years). No significant difference was found between inpatients and outpatients age and sex distribution(P > 0.472). RIFs were found in 195/1040(18.8%) Ce CT [inpatients = 108/470(23.0%); outpatients = 87/570(15.2%); P = 0.002]. RIFs were found in 30/440(6.8%) Ce CT with a previous exam and in 165/600(27.5%) without a previous exam(P < 0.001). Radiologists' distribution between inpatients or outpatients was significantly different(P < 0.001). RIFs prevalence increased with aging, except for a peak in 40-49 year group. Most involved organs were kidneys, gallbladder, and lungs.CONCLUSION: A RIF is detected in 1/5 patients undergoing abdominal Ce CT. Risk of overdiagnosis should be taken into account.