A new continuous catalytic reforming model was configured by using a molecule-based reactor module. Themodel was based on the Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Processing Co., Ltd. continuous catalytic reformer ...A new continuous catalytic reforming model was configured by using a molecule-based reactor module. Themodel was based on the Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Processing Co., Ltd. continuous catalytic reformer fullmodel, and was reduced to a size of 157 naphtha molecules (C1−C12) that underwent 764 reactions. The new model inheritedthe advantages of the original model, and had better solving performance and flexibility owing to support by the AspenHYSYS environment. Typical commercial plant data were selected for model validation, which showed advantages in theaccuracy of detailed predictions and the range of its application. In addition, the solving time was reduced from minutes toseconds. Therefore, the simplified model proved to be feasible for industrial application.展开更多
目的:比较宫颈癌盆腔照射螺旋断层放射治疗(Helical Tomotherapy,HT)计划与七野-静态调强放疗(7F-IMRT)计划的靶区和危及器官的剂量学差异。方法:选取2015年3月～2017年10月行HT治疗的25例宫颈癌患者,均采用俯卧位,憋尿状态。分别进行HT...目的:比较宫颈癌盆腔照射螺旋断层放射治疗(Helical Tomotherapy,HT)计划与七野-静态调强放疗(7F-IMRT)计划的靶区和危及器官的剂量学差异。方法:选取2015年3月～2017年10月行HT治疗的25例宫颈癌患者,均采用俯卧位,憋尿状态。分别进行HT和7F-IMRT两种计划设计,比较两种计划模式之间靶区和危及器官之间的剂量学参数及机器输出跳数。结果:(1)计划靶区(PTV):HT组CI和HI均优于7F-IMRT组,具有统计学差异(0.898±0.017 vs 0.834±0.013,P<0.001;0.062±0.012 vs 0.109±0.019,P<0.001);HT组PTV的D_1、D_2均低于7F-IMRT组(P<0.001),D_(mean)、D_(98)、D_(95)均较7F-IMRT组高(P=0.048,P<0.001,P=0.015)。(2)对于正常组织,HT组小肠、结肠、直肠和膀胱的D_(max)、D_(mean)、V_(30)、V_(40)以及直肠V_(50)均显著低于7F-IMRT组(P<0.001,P<0.001,P<0.001,P=0.001,P=0.006),其余V_(50)略低,无统计学差异(P=0.130);HT组双侧股骨头V_(25)、D_5、D_(mean)、D_(max)也显著低于7F-IMRT组(P<0.001);但是,HT组的机器输出量明显高于7F-IMRT组。结论:HT计划在适形度、均匀性及周围正常组织保护上显著优于7F-IMRT计划,在充分保证靶区剂量的同时又不增加患者放疗毒副反应;但其机器输出量高于7F-IMRT计划,对射束的利用率不高。在后续治疗实施过程中,HT系统作为影像引导放射治疗技术,确保每次治疗过程中的精准度,值得临床应用。展开更多
基金The authors acknowledge collaboration with and support from AspenTech via the National Key R&D Program of China(2021YFA1501201).
文摘A new continuous catalytic reforming model was configured by using a molecule-based reactor module. Themodel was based on the Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Processing Co., Ltd. continuous catalytic reformer fullmodel, and was reduced to a size of 157 naphtha molecules (C1−C12) that underwent 764 reactions. The new model inheritedthe advantages of the original model, and had better solving performance and flexibility owing to support by the AspenHYSYS environment. Typical commercial plant data were selected for model validation, which showed advantages in theaccuracy of detailed predictions and the range of its application. In addition, the solving time was reduced from minutes toseconds. Therefore, the simplified model proved to be feasible for industrial application.
文摘目的:比较宫颈癌盆腔照射螺旋断层放射治疗(Helical Tomotherapy,HT)计划与七野-静态调强放疗(7F-IMRT)计划的靶区和危及器官的剂量学差异。方法:选取2015年3月～2017年10月行HT治疗的25例宫颈癌患者,均采用俯卧位,憋尿状态。分别进行HT和7F-IMRT两种计划设计,比较两种计划模式之间靶区和危及器官之间的剂量学参数及机器输出跳数。结果:(1)计划靶区(PTV):HT组CI和HI均优于7F-IMRT组,具有统计学差异(0.898±0.017 vs 0.834±0.013,P<0.001;0.062±0.012 vs 0.109±0.019,P<0.001);HT组PTV的D_1、D_2均低于7F-IMRT组(P<0.001),D_(mean)、D_(98)、D_(95)均较7F-IMRT组高(P=0.048,P<0.001,P=0.015)。(2)对于正常组织,HT组小肠、结肠、直肠和膀胱的D_(max)、D_(mean)、V_(30)、V_(40)以及直肠V_(50)均显著低于7F-IMRT组(P<0.001,P<0.001,P<0.001,P=0.001,P=0.006),其余V_(50)略低,无统计学差异(P=0.130);HT组双侧股骨头V_(25)、D_5、D_(mean)、D_(max)也显著低于7F-IMRT组(P<0.001);但是,HT组的机器输出量明显高于7F-IMRT组。结论:HT计划在适形度、均匀性及周围正常组织保护上显著优于7F-IMRT计划,在充分保证靶区剂量的同时又不增加患者放疗毒副反应;但其机器输出量高于7F-IMRT计划,对射束的利用率不高。在后续治疗实施过程中,HT系统作为影像引导放射治疗技术,确保每次治疗过程中的精准度,值得临床应用。
