Insights into complications after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Zhao's study,offers a comprehensive analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty(UKA)revision indications.The study provides a detailed,case-by-case analysis of the factors leading to knee revision surgery in 13 patients.Not only elucidates the complexities of UKA revisions but also underscores the importance of continuous improvement in surgical techniques and the adoption of innovative technologies.

Navigating postoperative complications:Uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome after Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation

Altwijri and Alsirhy reported a case of uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome after an Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation surgery in an advanced primary open-angle glaucoma patient,being the first ever recorded of its kind.The author describes the position of the tube as the origin of the anterior chamber inflam-mation and hyphema,which resolved shortly after shortening and relocating it.This publication emphasizes the importance of precise implant positioning and close-up patient follow-up after glaucoma filtration surgery as an important standard for healthcare providers.

Navigating medial patellotibial ligament reconstruction:Clinical perspectives and surgical strategies

The surgical approach for patellar instability usually refers to reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament associated with an osteotomy of the tibial tuberosity or a trochleoplasty when required.The medial patellotibial ligament and the medial patellomeniscal ligament are secondary stabilizers of the patella.Despite this,both the medial patellotibial and patellofemoral ligaments aid in patellar rotation and tilt when the knee is flexed beyond 45°.The medial patellotibial ligament plays a particularly important role in the final stages of stretching in extension and between 40 degrees to 90 degrees of flexion.The clinical relevance and surgical indications for medial patellotibial ligament reconstruction associated with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction are still controversial.This editorial explores the surgical indications and clinical results for medial patellotibial ligament reconstruction to improve readers’understanding of this technique,especially because reported clinical outcomes have remained sparse.

Failure rate,return-to-sports and magnetic resonance imaging after meniscal repair:119 patients with 7 years mean follow up

BACKGROUND One of the most important factors to consider in relation to meniscal repair is the high failure rate reported in the existing literature.AIM To evaluate failure rates,return to sports(RTS)rate,clinical outcomes and magnetic resonance image(MRI)evaluation after meniscus suture repair for longitudinal tears at a minimum 2-year-follow-up.METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of meniscal repairs between January 2004 and December 2018.All patients treated for longitudinal tears associated or not with an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction(ACL-R)were included.Meniscal ramp lesions,radial and root tears,associated with multiligament injuries,tibial fracture and meniscal allograft transplants were excluded.Surgical details and failure rate,defined as symptomatic patients who underwent a revision surgery,were analyzed.As isolated bucket handle tears(BHTs)were usually associated with higher failure rates,we compared BHTs and not BHTs associated or not with an ACL-R.Since 2014,the inside-out technique using cannulas and suture needles with 2-0 Tycron began to predominate.In addition,the number of stitches per repair was increased.In view of differences in surgical technique,we compared two different cohorts:before and after 2014.We recorded the RTS according to the level achieved and the time to RTS.Lysholm and IKDC scores were recorded.Patients were studied with x-rays and MRI as standard postoperative control.RESULTS One hundred and nineteen patients were included with a mean follow up of 7 years(SD:4.08).Overall failure rate was 20.3%at a mean 20.1 mo.No statistically significant differences were found when comparing failure for medial and lateral meniscal repair(22.7%and 15.3%,P=0.36),BHTs and not BHTs(26%and 17.6%,P=0.27),isolated or associated with an ACL-R(22.9%and 18%,P=0.47),or when comparing only BHTs associated with an ACL-R(23%and 27.7%,P=0.9)or not.When comparing cohorts before and after 2014,we found a significant decrease in the overall failure rate from 26%to 11%(P<0.03).Isolated lesions presented a decrease from 28%to 6.6%(P=0.02),BHTs from 34%to 8%(P=0.09)and those associated with an ACL-R from 25%to 10%(P=0.09).Mean RTS time was 6.5 mo in isolated lesions and 8.64 mo when associated with an ACL-R.Overall,56%of patients returned to the same sport activity level.Mean pre and postoperative Lysholm scores were 64 and 85(P=0.02),and IKDC 58 and 70(P=0.03).Out of 84 asymptomatic patients evaluated with MRI,39%were classified as“not healed”and 61%as“healed”.CONCLUSION Even though the overall failure rate of our series was 20.3%,we found a statistically significant decrease from 26%to 11%,not only for isolated lesions,but also for BHT’s and those associated with an ACL-R when comparing our series in two different cohorts,most probably due to improvements in surgical technique.

Clinical,imaging,arthroscopic,and histologic features of bilateral anteromedial meniscofemoral ligament:A case report

BACKGROUND The anteromedial meniscofemoral ligament(AMMFL)is a very rare entity,commonly unrecognized and underreported.Although it was not proved to be a cause of anterior knee pain,concerns have been raised on the relationship between the presence of this structure and medial meniscus injury secondary to its abnormal motion.Regarding histologic examination,some studies have shown meniscus-like fibrocartilage,while others have identified it as ligament-like collagenous fibrous connective tissue.CASE SUMMARY We report the case of a 34-year-old ballerina with an AMMFL associated with a torn medial meniscus of both knees.Surgery was performed to treat the meniscal injury and two biopsies of each AMMFL were taken in different locations to define the histopathological composition.Histologic examination revealed fibrocartilaginous tissue compatible with meniscus.Follow-up evaluation one year after surgery evidenced full remission of symptoms and the patient had resumed her athletic activities.CONCLUSION Clinical,magnetic resonance imaging,arthroscopic,and histological features have been carefully described to better characterize the AMMFL.

Overview of the anterolateral complex of the knee

In the last few years,much more information on the anterolateral complex of the knee has become available.It has now been demonstrated how it works in conjunction with the anterior cruciate ligament(ACL)controlling anterolateral rotatory laxity.Biomechanical studies have shown that the anterolateral complex(ALC)has a role as a secondary stabilizer to the ACL in opposing anterior tibial translation and internal tibial rotation.It is of utmost importance that surgeons comprehend the intricate anatomy of the entire anterolateral aspect of the knee.Although most studies have only focused on the anterolateral ligament(ALL),the ALC of the knee consists of a functional unit formed by the layers of the iliotibial band combined with the anterolateral joint capsule.Considerable interest has also been given to imaging evaluation using magnetic resonance and several studies have targeted the evaluation of the ALC in the setting of ACL injury.Results are inconsistent with a lack of association between magnetic resonance imaging evidence of injury and clinical findings.Isolated ACL reconstruction may not always reestablish knee rotatory stability in patients with associated ALC injury.In such cases,additional procedures,such as anterolateral reconstruction or lateral tenodesis,may be indicated.There are several techniques available for ALL reconstruction.Graft options include the iliotibial band,gracilis or semitendinosus tendon autograft,or allograft.

Has platelet-rich plasma any role in partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament?Prospective comparative study

BACKGROUND Partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament(ACL)are frequent,and there is still considerable controversy surrounding their diagnosis,natural history and treatment.AIM To examine patient-reported outcomes,physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)findings of partial ACL tears treated with an intraarticular injection of platelet-rich plasma(PRP)compared to a control group.METHODS From January 2015 to November 2017,consecutive patients from a single institution with partial ACL tears treated nonoperatively were prospectively evaluated.Partial tears were defined as a positive Lachman test with a clear endpoint,a negative pivot-shift and less than 3 mm of side-to-side difference using the KT1000 arthrometer.Patients in group 1 were treated with one intraarticular injection of PRP and specific physical therapy protocol.Control group consisted of patients treated only with physical therapy.Prospective analyzed data included physical examination,Tegner activity level and Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores.Baseline MRI findings and at 6 mo follow-up were reviewed.Failure was defined as those patients with clinical instability at follow-up that required a subsequent ACL reconstruction.RESULTS A total of 40 patients where included,21 treated with PRP injection with a mean follow-up of 25 mo[standard deviation(SD):3.6]and 19 in the control group with a mean follow-up of 25 mo(SD:5.68).Overall failure rate was 32.0%(n=13).No significant differences were observed between groups regarding subjective outcomes,return to sport and failure rate.MRI findings revealed an improvement in the ACL signal in half of the patients of both groups.However,we did not find a significant relationship between MRI findings and clinical outcomes.CONCLUSION Overall,95.0%of patients returned to sports at a mean follow-up of 25 mo.Mean time to return to sports was 4 mo.Out of these patients,almost 30.0%in each group had a new episode of instability and required surgery at a median time of 5 mo in group 1 and 8 mo in group 2.The addition of PRP alone was not sufficient to enhance any of the outcome measures evaluated,including MRI images,clinical evaluation and failure rate.