Immunology demystified: A guide for transplant hepatologists

Liver transplantation has become standard practice for treating end-stage liver disease.The success of the procedure relies on effective immunosuppressive medications to control the host's immune response.Despite the liver's inherent capacity to foster tolerance,the early post-transplant period is marked by significant immune reactivity.To ensure favorable outcomes,it is imperative to identify and manage various rejection types,encompassing T-cell-mediated,antibody-mediated,and chronic rejection.However,the approach to prescribing immunosuppressants relies heavily on clinical judgment rather than evidencebased criteria.Given that the majority of patients will require lifelong immunosuppression as the mechanisms underlying operational tolerance are still being investigated,healthcare providers must possess an understanding of immune responses,rejection mechanisms,and the pathways targeted by immunosuppressive drugs.This knowledge enables customization of treatments and improved patient care,even though a consensus on an optimal immunosuppressive regimen remains elusive.

Genitourinary tumors and liver transplantation: A comprehensive review

Liver transplantation is as a crucial therapeutic option for patients with end-stage liver disease,but the persistent organ shortage emphasizes a need to explore unconventional donor sources,including individuals with a history of malignan-cies.This review investigates the viability of liver donation from individuals with current or past genitourinary malignancies,focusing on renal,prostate and urinary bladder cancers.The rising incidence of urogenital malignancies among potential donors is thought to result from increasing donor age.Analysis of transmission risks reveals low rates of donor-derived cancer transmission,partic-ularly for early-stage renal and prostate cancers.Recipients with a history of genitourinary malignancy pose complex challenges regarding post-transplant immunosuppression and cancer recurrence.Nonetheless,the evidence suggests acceptable outcomes can be achieved with careful patient selection and tailored management strategies.Recommendations for pre-transplant evaluation and post-transplant surveillance are discussed,highlighting the need for individualized approaches in this patient population.Further prospective studies are warranted to refine guidelines and optimize outcomes in liver transplantation for patients with genitourinary malignancies.

Shifting perspectives in liver diseases after kidney transplantation

Liver diseases after kidney transplantation range from mild biochemical abnormalities to severe hepatitis or cirrhosis.The causes are diverse and mainly associated with hepatotropic viruses,drug toxicity and metabolic disorders.Over the past decade,the aetiology of liver disease in kidney recipients has changed significantly.These relates to the use of direct-acting antiviral agents against hepatitis C virus,the increasing availability of vaccination against hepatitis B and a better understanding of drug-induced hepatotoxicity.In addition,the emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic has brought new challenges to kidney recipients.This review aims to provide healthcare professionals with a comprehensive understanding of recent advances in the management of liver complications in kidney recipients and to enable them to make informed decisions regarding the risks and impact of liver disease in this population.

Approach to persistent ascites after liver transplantation

Persistent ascites(PA)after liver transplantation(LT),commonly defined as ascites lasting more than 4 wk after LT,can be expected in up to 7%of patients.Despite being relatively rare,it is associated with worse clinical outcomes,including higher 1-year mortality.The cause of PA can be divided into vascular,hepatic,or extrahepatic.Vascular causes of PA include hepatic outflow and inflow obstructions,which are usually successfully treated.Regarding modifiable hepatic causes,recurrent hepatitis C and acute cellular rejection are the leading ones.Considering predictors for PA,the presence of ascites,refractory ascites,hepatorenal syndrome type 1,spontaneous bacterial peritonitis,hepatic encephalopathy,and prolonged ischemic time significantly influence the development of PA after LT.The initial approach to patients with PA should be to diagnose the treatable cause of PA.The stepwise approach in evaluating PA includes diagnostic paracentesis,ultrasound with Doppler,and an echocardiogram when a cardiac cause is suspected.Finally,a percutaneous or transjugular liver biopsy should be performed in cases where the diagnosis is unclear.PA of unknown cause should be treated with diuretics and paracentesis,while transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and splenic artery embolization are treatment methods in patients with refractory ascites after LT.