Objective:To assess the psychometric properties of the Thai version of the Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale version 3.0(SCSES-v3.0)in individuals with chronic illnesses.Although originally developed and tested in a Weste...Objective:To assess the psychometric properties of the Thai version of the Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale version 3.0(SCSES-v3.0)in individuals with chronic illnesses.Although originally developed and tested in a Western context,its applicability in Asian populations,including Thailand,remains inadequately explored.Methods:Psychometric tests were guided by COSMIN principles.This included the translation of the English version into Thai based on the ISPOR framework.Nine nursing experts evaluated the content validity.Data were obtained from a multicenter cross-sectional study conducted between July and November 2022.This study included individuals with chronic conditions from 16 primary care centers in Thailand.We tested the structural validity using exploratory factor analysis(EFA)and confirmatory factor analysis(CFA),and concurrent validity in relation to the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory version 4.c(SC-CII-v4.c).We tested the scale’s reliability with McDonald’s u,Cronbach’s a,and the intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC).Results:The Thai SCSES-v3.0 demonstrated excellent content validity(k¼1.00).Thefinal analysis included a total of 385 participants.The EFA with thefirst split-half subsample(n¼193)extracted a twofactor structure.One reflected SCSES for maintenance and monitoring behaviors and another captured SCSES for management behaviors(item 6e10).CFA with the second split-half subsample(n¼192)and the overall sample(n¼385)supported the scale’s two-factor model with high factor loadings.Each dimension and the overall SCSES-v3.0 positively correlated with each scale and the overall SC-CII-v4.c.McDonald’s u and Cronbach’s a(both ranged 0.91e0.94)and ICC(ranged 0.95e0.96),indicated excellent internal reliability and test-retest reliability,respectively.Conclusions:The identification of a valid and reliable two-factor model for the Thai SCSES-v3.0 renders it a valuable tool for clinicians and investigators,facilitating the assessment of self-efficacy in self-care across diverse contexts.展开更多
目的评估照顾者对慢性病自我护理贡献量表泰语版第2版(Thai version of Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care Chronic Illness Inventory version 2,Thai CC-SC-CII-v2)在脑卒中患者照顾者中应用的心理测量特征,包括总量表和3个独立量...目的评估照顾者对慢性病自我护理贡献量表泰语版第2版(Thai version of Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care Chronic Illness Inventory version 2,Thai CC-SC-CII-v2)在脑卒中患者照顾者中应用的心理测量特征,包括总量表和3个独立量表的有效性和可靠性。方法采用多中心横断面研究设计。2022年9—12月,共招募422名来自泰国南部初级保健中心的脑卒中患者照顾者。结构效度检验采用验证性因子分析,聚合效度使用Thai CC-SC-CII-v2与照顾者对患者自我护理贡献的自我效能量表(Caregiver Self-Efficacy in Contribu-ting to Patient Self-Care Scale,CSE-SCS)之间的相关系数进行评估。内部一致性采用Cronbach's α系数、复合可靠性指数和McDonald Omega系数进行评估;通过组内相关系数(intraclass correlation coefficients,ICCs)评估重测信度。结果这项研究主要纳入了照顾脑卒中父母的中年女性。验证性因子分析结果支持CC-SC-CII-v2维护量表和管理量表的双因子结构及监测量表的单因子结构。对合并项目集同时进行验证性因子分析支持更综合的模型。CC-SC-CII-v2与CSE-SCS的相关系数范围0.47~0.65,均P<0.001。3个独立量表的Cronbach's α系数范围0.82~0.89,复本信度系数范围0.84~0.85,McDonaldω系数范围0.83~0.85,ICCs范围0.86~0.90,均表明量表信度良好。结论泰语版CC-SC-CII-v2在脑卒中患者照顾者中表现出稳定的心理测量学特性,可作为在泰国等类似文化背景下调查照顾者对卒中患者自我护理贡献的有用工具。展开更多
基金The original study wasfinancially supported by Walailak University(grant number:WU65240,Year 2022).
文摘Objective:To assess the psychometric properties of the Thai version of the Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale version 3.0(SCSES-v3.0)in individuals with chronic illnesses.Although originally developed and tested in a Western context,its applicability in Asian populations,including Thailand,remains inadequately explored.Methods:Psychometric tests were guided by COSMIN principles.This included the translation of the English version into Thai based on the ISPOR framework.Nine nursing experts evaluated the content validity.Data were obtained from a multicenter cross-sectional study conducted between July and November 2022.This study included individuals with chronic conditions from 16 primary care centers in Thailand.We tested the structural validity using exploratory factor analysis(EFA)and confirmatory factor analysis(CFA),and concurrent validity in relation to the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory version 4.c(SC-CII-v4.c).We tested the scale’s reliability with McDonald’s u,Cronbach’s a,and the intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC).Results:The Thai SCSES-v3.0 demonstrated excellent content validity(k¼1.00).Thefinal analysis included a total of 385 participants.The EFA with thefirst split-half subsample(n¼193)extracted a twofactor structure.One reflected SCSES for maintenance and monitoring behaviors and another captured SCSES for management behaviors(item 6e10).CFA with the second split-half subsample(n¼192)and the overall sample(n¼385)supported the scale’s two-factor model with high factor loadings.Each dimension and the overall SCSES-v3.0 positively correlated with each scale and the overall SC-CII-v4.c.McDonald’s u and Cronbach’s a(both ranged 0.91e0.94)and ICC(ranged 0.95e0.96),indicated excellent internal reliability and test-retest reliability,respectively.Conclusions:The identification of a valid and reliable two-factor model for the Thai SCSES-v3.0 renders it a valuable tool for clinicians and investigators,facilitating the assessment of self-efficacy in self-care across diverse contexts.
基金supported by Walailak University(grant number:WU-IRG-65-028,Year 2022).
文摘目的评估照顾者对慢性病自我护理贡献量表泰语版第2版(Thai version of Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care Chronic Illness Inventory version 2,Thai CC-SC-CII-v2)在脑卒中患者照顾者中应用的心理测量特征,包括总量表和3个独立量表的有效性和可靠性。方法采用多中心横断面研究设计。2022年9—12月,共招募422名来自泰国南部初级保健中心的脑卒中患者照顾者。结构效度检验采用验证性因子分析,聚合效度使用Thai CC-SC-CII-v2与照顾者对患者自我护理贡献的自我效能量表(Caregiver Self-Efficacy in Contribu-ting to Patient Self-Care Scale,CSE-SCS)之间的相关系数进行评估。内部一致性采用Cronbach's α系数、复合可靠性指数和McDonald Omega系数进行评估;通过组内相关系数(intraclass correlation coefficients,ICCs)评估重测信度。结果这项研究主要纳入了照顾脑卒中父母的中年女性。验证性因子分析结果支持CC-SC-CII-v2维护量表和管理量表的双因子结构及监测量表的单因子结构。对合并项目集同时进行验证性因子分析支持更综合的模型。CC-SC-CII-v2与CSE-SCS的相关系数范围0.47~0.65,均P<0.001。3个独立量表的Cronbach's α系数范围0.82~0.89,复本信度系数范围0.84~0.85,McDonaldω系数范围0.83~0.85,ICCs范围0.86~0.90,均表明量表信度良好。结论泰语版CC-SC-CII-v2在脑卒中患者照顾者中表现出稳定的心理测量学特性,可作为在泰国等类似文化背景下调查照顾者对卒中患者自我护理贡献的有用工具。
