Unusual histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens from patients with suspected acute appendicitis

AIM: To investigate the prevalence and implications of unusual histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens from patients with suspected acute appendicitis. METHODS: The demographic and histopathological data of 1621 patients (≥ 16 years-old) who underwent appendectomy to treat an initial diagnosis of acute appendicitis between January 1999 and November 2011 were retrospectively assessed. Microscopic findings were used to classify the patients under six categories: appendix vermiformis, phlegmonous appendicitis, gan- grenous appendicitis, perforated appendicitis, supurative appendicitis, and unusual histopathologic findings. The demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with unusual histopathologic findings were evaluated in detail, and re-analysis of archived resected appendix specimens was carried out. RESULTS: A total of 912 males and 709 females, from16 to 94 years old, were included in the study and comprised 789 cases of suppurative appendicitis, 370 cases of appendix vermiformis, 243 cases of perforated gangrenous appendicitis, 53 cases of flegmaneous appendicitis, 32 cases of gangrenous appendicitis, and 134 (8.3%) cases of unusual histopathological findings. The unusual histopathological findings included fibrous obliteration (n = 62), enterobius vermicularis (n = 31), eosinophilic infiltration (n = 10), mucinous cystadenoma (n = 8), carcinoid tumor (n = 6), granulomatous inflammation (n = 5), adenocarcinoma (n = 4; one of them mucinous), and mucocele (n = 3), adenomatous polyp (n = 1), taenia sup (n = 1), ascaris lumbricoides (n = 1), appendiceal diverticula (n = 1), and B cell non-hodgkin lymphoma (n = 1). None of the 11 patients with subsequent diagnosis of tumor were suspected of cancer prior to the appendectomy. CONCLUSION: Even when the macroscopic appearance of appendectomy specimens is normal, histopathological assessment will allow early diagnosis of many unusual diseases.

Laparoscopic right-sided colonic resection with transluminal colonoscopic specimen extraction

AIM: To study the transcolonic extraction of the proximally resected colonic specimens by colonoscopic assistance at laparoscopic colonic surgery. METHODS: The diagnoses of our patients were Crohn's disease, carcinoid of appendix and adenocarcinoma of cecum. We preferred laparoscopic total mesocolic resections. Colon and terminal ileum were divided with endoscopic staplers. A colonoscope was placed per anal and moved proximally in the colon till to reach the colonic closed end under the laparoscopic guidance. The stump of the colon was opened with laparoscopic scissors. A snare of colonoscope was released and the intraperitoneal complete free colonic specimen was grasped. Specimen was moved in to the colon with the help of the laparoscopic graspers and pulled gently through the large bowel and extracted through the anus. The open end of the colon was closed again and the ileal limb and the colon were anastomosed intracorporeally with a 60-mm laparoscopic stapler. The common enterotomy orifice was closed in two layers with a running intracorporeal suture.RESULTS: There were three patients with laparoscopic right-sided colonic resections and their specimens were intended to remove through the remnant colon by colonoscopy but the procedure failed in one patient(adenocarcinoma) due to a bulky mass and the specimen extraction was converted to transvaginal route. All the patients had prior abdominal surgeries and had related adhesions. The operating times were 210, 300 and 500 min. The lengths of the specimenswere 13, 17 and 27 cm. In our cases, there were no superficial or deep surgical site infections or any other complications. The patients were discharged uneventfully within 4-5 d and they were asymptomatic after a mean 7.6 mo follow-up(ranged 4-12). As far as we know, there were only 12 cases reported yet on transcolonic extraction of the proximal colonic specimens by colonoscopic assistance after laparoscopic resections. With our cases, success rate of the overall experience in the literature was 80%(12/15) in selected cases. CONCLUSION: Transcolonic specimen extraction for right-sided colonic resection is feasible in selected patients. Both natural orifice surgery and intracorporeal anastomosis avoids mini-laparotomy for specimen extraction or anastomosis.

Liver transplant for large hepatocellular carcinoma in Malatya: Therole of gamma glutamyl transferase and alpha-fetoprotein, aretrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND There is increasing interest in transplanting patients with hepatocellularcarcinoma (HCC) with tumors greater than 5 cm (Milan criteria).AIM To investigate possible prognostically-useful factors for liver transplantation inHCC patients with large tumors.METHODS In this clinical study, 50 patients with HCC who were transplanted at our LiverTransplant Center between April 2006 and August 2019 and had tumors greaterthan 6 cm maximum diameter were retrospectively analyzed. Their survival andfull clinical characteristics were examined, with respect to serum alphafetoprotein(AFP) and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) levels. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to determine overall survival and disease-freesurvival in these patients. The inclusion criterion was evidence of HCC. Exclusioncriteria were the presence of macroscopic portal vein thrombosis or metastasisand a follow-up period of less than 90 d.RESULTS Using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, cutoff values of AFP200 ng/mL and GGT 104 IU/L were identified and used in this study.Significantly longer overall survival (OS) and disease-free-survival (DFS) were found in patients who had lower values of either parameter, compared withhigher values. Even greater differences in survival were found when the 2parameters were combined. Two tumor size bands were identified, in searchingfor the limits of this approach with larger tumors, namely 6-10 cm and > 10 cm.Combination parameters in the 6-10 cm band reflected 5-year OS of 76.2% inpatients with low AFP plus low GGT vs 0% for all other groups. Patients withtumors greater than 10 cm, did not have low AFP plus low GGT. The mostconsistent clinical correlates for longer survival were degree of tumordifferentiation and absence of microscopic portal venous invasion.CONCLUSION Serum levels of AFP and GGT, both alone and combined, represent a simpleprognostic identifier in patients with large HCCs undergoing liver transplantation.

Renoportal anastomosis in living donor liver transplantation with prior proximal splenorenal shunt

For transplant surgeons, end-stage liver disease with portal venous thrombosis and a previous splenorenal shunt(SRS) is a significant challenge during liver transplantation. Thrombosis of the portal vein can be corrected by surgical interventions, such as portal venous thrombectomy or surgical removal of the thrombosed portal vein. Even also placement of a graft between the mesenteric vein and the graft portal vein can be performed. If these maneuvers fail, a renoportal anastomosis(RPA) can be performed to achieve adequate graft inflow. A 51-year-old male patient who had a history of proximal SRS and splenectomy underwent living donor liver transplantation(LDLT) due to cryptogenic cirrhosis. LDLT was performed with RPA using a cadaveric iliac vein graft. The early postoperative course of the patient was completely uneventful and he was discharged 20 d after transplantation. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first patient to receive LDLT with RPA after surgical proximal SRS and splenectomy.

Hepatic artery reconstruction technique in liver transplantation:experience with 3,000 cases

Hepatic artery reconstruction(HAR)is the most valuable step in correcting graft and recipient survival after liver transplantation(LT).Hepatic artery thrombosis(HAT)in immediate postoperative period may lead to fatal complications.Hepatic allograft is partial in a living donor liver transplantation(LDLT),and HAR is technically much more difficult than deceased donor liver transplantation(DDLT).The likelihood of HAT in LDLT is higher due to the narrower diameters of arterial vessels.