Enhancement of anti-PD-L1 antibody plus anlotinib efficacy due to downregulation of PD-L1 in the micro-conduit endothelium within the tumor:a randomized double-blind trial

Objective:The possible enhancing effect of anlotinib on programmed death receptor ligand(PD-L1)antibody and the efficacy-predicting power of PD-L1 in micro-conduit endothelium,including lymphatic endothelial cells(LECs)and blood endothelial cells(BECs),were determined to identify patients who would benefit from this treatment.Methods:PD-L1 positivity in LECs,BECs,and tumor cells(TCs)was assessed using paraffin sections with multicolor immunofluorescence in an investigator’s brochure clinical trial of TQB2450(PD-L1 antibody)alone or in combination with anlotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Progression-free survival(PFS)with different levels of PD-L1 expression was compared between the two groups.Results:Among 75 patients,the median PFS(mPFS)was longer in patients who received TQB2450 with anlotinib[10 and 12 mg(161 and 194 days,respectively)]than patients receiving TQB2450 alone(61 days)[hazard ratio(HR)_(10 mg)=0.390(95%confidence interval{CI},0.201–0.756),P=0.005;HR_(12 mg)=0.397(0.208–0.756),P=0.005].The results were similar among 58 patients with high PD-L1 expression in LECs and TCs[159 and 209 vs.82 days,HR_(10 mg)=0.445(0.210–0.939),P=0.034;HR_(12 mg)=0.369(0.174–0.784),P=0.009],and 53 patients with high PD-L1 expression in BECs and TCs[161 and 209 vs.41 days,HR_(10 mg)=0.340(0.156–0.742),P=0.007;HR_(12 mg)=0.340(0.159–0.727),P=0.005].No differences were detected in the mPFS between the TQB2450 and combination therapy groups in 13 low/no LEC-expressing and 18 low/no BEC-expressing PD-L1 cases.Conclusions:Mono-immunotherapy is not effective in patients with high PD-L1 expression in LECs and/or BECs.Anlotinib may increase efficacy by downregulating PD-L1 expression in LECs and/or BECs,which is presumed to be a feasible marker for screening the optimal immune patient population undergoing anti-angiogenic therapy.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of icotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Objective： To evaluate the efficacy and safety of icotinib hydrochloride in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer （NSCLC）. Methods： A total of 89 patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC received icotinib at a dose of 125 mg administered 3 times a day. Icotinib treatment was continued until disease progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. Results： A total of 89 patients were assessable. In patients treated with icotinib, the overall response rate （RR） was 36.0% （32/89）, and the disease control rate （DCR） was 69.7% （62/89）. RR and DCR were significantly improved in patients with adenocarcinoma versus non-adenocarcinoma （P〈0.05）. The symptom improvement rate was 57.3% （51/89）, and the main symptoms improved were cough, pain, chest distress, dyspnea, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The main toxic effects were rash [30/89 （33.7%）] and diarrhea [15/89 （16.9%）]. The level of toxicity was typically low. Conclusions： The use of icofinib hydrochloride in the treatment of advanced NSCLC is efficacious and safe, and its toxic effects are tolerable.

Equivalent efficacy study of QL1101 and bevacizumab on untreated advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients: a phase 3 randomized, double-blind clinical trial

Objective:This phase 3 study aimed to test equivalence in efficacy and safety for QL1101,a bevacizumab analogue in Chinese patients with untreated locally advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods:Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive carboplatin and paclitaxel in combination with either QL1101 or bevacizumab,15 mg/kg every 3-week for 6 cycles.This was followed by maintenance treatment with single agent QL1101 every 3-week.The primary end-point was objective response rate(ORR),with secondary end-points being progression-free survival(PFS),overall survival(OS),disease control rate(DCR),and adverse events(AEs).Results:Of 675 patients,535 eligible patients were randomized to the QL1101 group(n=269)and bevacizumab group(n=266).ORRs were 52.8%and 56.8%,respectively,for the QL1101 and bevacizumab groups,with an ORR hazard ratio 0.93(95%confidence interval:0.8-0131.1).The PFS,OS,DCR,and AEs were comparable between the 2 groups,which remained the same after stratification according to epidermal growth factor receptor mutation or smoking history.Conclusions:QL1101 showed similar efficacy and safety profiles as compared to bevacizumab among Chinese patients with untreated locally advanced non-squamous NSCLC.

Equivalent efficacy assessment of QL1101 and bevacizumab in nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer patients:A two-year follow-up data update

Objective: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF) monoclonal antibodies are an effective means of treating non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). Here, we aim to update the equivalent efficacy assessment between QL1101 and bevacizumab based on two-year follow-up data.Methods: In total, 535 eligible NSCLC patients were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to the QL1101 group and the bevacizumab group. The full end time of this study was defined as 24 months after the last enrolled patient was randomized. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate(ORR);equivalence was confirmed if the two-sided 90% confidence interval(90% CI) of the relative risk was within the range of 0.75-1.33. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival(PFS) and overall survival(OS).Results: The two-year updated data showed similar ORR(QL1101 vs. bevacizumab: 53.1% vs. 54.3%;relative risk=0.977;90% CI: 0.838-1.144), PFS(235 d vs. 254 d, log-rank P=0.311), and OS(577 d vs. 641 d, log-rank P=0.099) results between the QL1101 group and the bevacizumab group. The mean shrinkage ratio of targeted lesions was also similar between the QL1101 group and the bevacizumab group(22.5% vs. 23.5%). For patients who received QL1101 maintenance therapy, similar results were shown between the QL1101 group(n=157) and the bevacizumab group(n=148)(PFS: 253 d vs. 272 d, log-rank P=0.387;OS: 673 d vs. 790 d, log-rank P=0.101;mean tumor shrinkage rate: 26.6% vs. 27.5%).Conclusions: This study reported that QL1101 had similar efficacy in treating nonsquamous NSCLC in terms of ORR, PFS and OS based on two-year updated data, providing a basis for the clinical application of QL1101.