Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal higher-order aberrations measurements after small incision lenticule extraction using the Scheimpfug-Placido topographer

Background:To evaluate the precision of corneal higher-order aberrations measurements after small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE)using the Sirius Scheimpfug-Placido topographer(CSO,Italy).Methods:Seventy-fve eyes from 75 postoperative subjects were included in this prospective study.Three consecutive corneal aberrometric measurements were obtained with the Scheimpfug-Placido topographer by two experienced operators to assess intra-and inter-observer reproducibility.The within-subject standard deviation(Sw),test-retest repeatability(TRT)and the intraclass correlation coefcient(ICC)were calculated.Results:For intraobserver repeatability of anterior and total corneal aberrations,all ICCs were more than 0.922,except for trefoil(0.722 to 0.768).The ICCs of total root mean square(RMS),coma Z(3,±1),and spherical aberration Z(4,0)were over 0.810 while higher-order RMS,trefoil Z(3,±3),and astigmatism II Z(4,±2)were below 0.634 for posterior corneal surface aberrations.All Sw values for all types of aberrations were equal to or below 0.07μm.Regarding interobserver reproducibility,all TRT values were no more than 0.12μm,0.05μm,and 0.11μm for anterior,posterior,and total corneal aberrations,respectively.The ICC values ranged from 0.875 to 0.989,from 0.686 to 0.976 and over 0.834 for anterior,posterior,and total corneal aberrations,respectively.Conclusions:The repeatability of measurements of anterior and total corneal aberrations with the Sirius system in corneas after SMILE surgery was high,except for trefoil.There was some variability in posterior corneal aberrometric measurements.High reproducibility of corneal aberrometric measurements was observed between measurements of both examiners,except for trefoil,with poor to moderate reproducibility.

Sirius Scheimpflug-Placido versus. ultrasound pachymetry for central corneal thickness: meta-analysis

Background:To compare the difference in central corneal thickness(CCT)measurements in normal eyes between a rotating Scheimpflug camera combined with a Placido-disk corneal topographer(Sirius,CSO,Italy)and ultrasound pachymetry(USP).Methods:A systematic literature search was conducted for relevant studies published on PubMed,Medline,EMBASE,and the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to August 1st,2019.Primary outcome measures were CCT measurements between Sirius and USP.A random effects model was used to pool CCT measurements.Results:A total of twelve studies involving 862 eyes were included in this meta-analysis.The meta-analysis found CCT measurements between Sirius and USP to be statistically significantly different(P<0.0001).The mean difference between Sirius and USP was-11.26μm with a 95%confidence interval(CI)(-16.92μm,-5.60μm).The heterogeneity Was IP=60%(P=0.004).Conclusion:CCT measurements with the Sirius Scheimpflug-Placido topographer were statistically significantly lower than USP.However,it may be argued that the mean difference of 11.26μm is not a clinically significant difference.

Sirius Scheimpflug–Placido versus ultrasound pachymetry for central corneal thickness:meta-analysis

Background:To compare the difference in central corneal thickness(CCT)measurements in normal eyes between a rotating Scheimpflug camera combined with a Placido-disk corneal topographer(Sirius,CSO,Italy)and ultrasound pachymetry(USP).Methods:A systematic literature search was conducted for relevant studies published on PubMed,Medline,EMBASE,and the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to August 1st,2019.Primary outcome measures were CCT measurements between Sirius and USP.A random effects model was used to pool CCT measurements.Results:A total of twelve studies involving 862 eyes were included in this meta-analysis.The meta-analysis found CCT measurements between Sirius and USP to be statistically significantly different(P<0.0001).The mean difference between Sirius and USP was−11.26μm with a 95%confidence interval(CI)(−16.92μm,−5.60μm).The heterogeneity was I^(2)=60%(P=0.004).Conclusion:CCT measurements with the Sirius Scheimpflug-Placido topographer were statistically significantly lower than USP.However,it may be argued that the mean difference of 11.26μm is not a clinically significant difference.

The precision and agreement of corneal thickness and keratometry measurements with SS-OCT versus Scheimpflug imaging

Purpose:To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of swept-source optical coherence tomography(SS-OCT)and Scheimpflug system and evaluate the agreement between the two systems in measuring multiple corneal regions in children.Methods:Pachymetric and keratometric maps for both systems were evaluated.Central,midperipheral and peripheral corneal thickness(CT),keratometry and astigmatism power vectors were recorded.The three outcomes yielded by the same observer were used to assess intraobserver repeatability.The differences in the mean values provided by each observer were used to evaluate interobserver reproducibility.Within-subject standard deviation,test-retest repeatability(TRT)and coefficient of variation(CoV)were used to analyze the intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility.Paired T-test and Bland-Altman were used to appraise interdevice agreement.Results:Seventy-eight eyes of 78 children were included.The CoV was≤2.12 and 1.10%,respectively,for repeatability and reproducibility.TRT and CoV were lower for central and paracentral CT measurements than for peripheral measurements.The SS-OCT device generated higher precision when acquiring CT data,whereas Scheimpflug system showed higher reliability when measuring corneal keratometry.Although the CT readings measured using SS-OCT were significantly thinner than Scheimpflug device(P<0.001),the central and thinnest CT values were still of high agreement.The interdevice agreement of keratometry measurement was high for the central corneal region and moderate for the paracentral and peripheral areas.Conclusions:The precision of CT measurements by SS-OCT was higher,while the reliability of keratometry measurements by the Scheimpflug system was higher in children.Apart from the measured values in the central corneal region,the thickness and keratometry readings should not be considered interchangeable between the two systems.

The precision and agreement of corneal thickness and keratometry measurements with SS-OCT versus Scheimpflug imaging

Purpose:To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of swept-source optical coherence tomography(SS-OCT)and Scheimpflug system and evaluate the agreement between the two systems in measuring multiple corneal regions in children.Methods:Pachymetric and keratometric maps for both systems were evaluated.Central,midperipheral and peripheral corneal thickness(CT),keratometry and astigmatism power vectors were recorded.The three outcomes yielded by the same observer were used to assess intraobserver repeatability.The differences in the mean values provided by each observer were used to evaluate interobserver reproducibility.Within-subject standard deviation,test-retest repeatability(TRT)and coefficient of variation(CoV)were used to analyze the intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility.Paired T-test and Bland-Altman were used to appraise interdevice agreement.Results:Seventy-eight eyes of 78 children were included.The CoV was≤2.12 and 1.10%,respectively,for repeatability and reproducibility.TRT and CoV were lower for central and paracentral CT measurements than for peripheral measurements.The SS-OCT device generated higher precision when acquiring CT data,whereas Scheimpflug system showed higher reliability when measuring corneal keratometry.Although the CT readings measured using SS-OCT were significantly thinner than Scheimpflug device(P<0.001),the central and thinnest CT values were still of high agreement.The interdevice agreement of keratometry measurement was high for the central corneal region and moderate for the paracentral and peripheral areas.Conclusions:The precision of CT measurements by SS-OCT was higher,while the reliability of keratometry measurements by the Scheimpflug system was higher in children.Apart from the measured values in the central corneal region,the thickness and keratometry readings should not be considered interchangeable between the two systems.

IOLMaster500测量2~6岁儿童眼轴长度的重复性和再现性

目的:评估不同操作者使用光学相干生物测量仪IOLMaster500测量2~6岁儿童眼轴长度的重复性和再现性。方法:横断面研究。共纳入2016年12月至2017年3月在温州医科大学附属眼视光医院杭州院区视光门诊部就诊的102名(102只右眼)2~6岁儿童,先由一名操作者连续测得3组有效眼轴长度数据,随即换另一名操作者重复测量操作再获得3组有效眼轴长度数据。采用重复测量方差分析、Bland-Altman分析和组内相关系数(ICC)计算相关数据;2位操作者的测量结果采用不同分析方法(3次测量数据的均值,第1次测量数据);其中2组单次测量数据、均值各自进行配对t检验、Bland-Altman分析,计算组内标准差(Sw)、2.77Sw和组内变异系数(CoV)。结果:同一测量者的重复测量方差分析P值均大于0.05,差异无统计学意义,并均具有很窄的95%一致性界限(LoA)(均小于-0.04至0.04mm),ICC为1.000。不同测量者的配对t检验P值均大于0.05,差异无统计学意义,并均具有很窄的95%LoA(均小于-0.04至0.03mm),且均值法的95%LoA比单次测量法窄42.86%,两者Sw、2.77Sw数据均分别小于0.01mm和0.03mm,CoV均小于0.05%。结论:同一操作者对IOLMaster500测量2~6岁儿童眼轴长度具有良好的重复性,不同操作者测量同一患者具有良好的再现性。此外,每位操作者连续测量3次的平均值比各测1次的值具有更好的再现性。