Serum prostate-specific antigen as a predictor of prostate volume and lower urinary tract symptoms in acommunity-based cohort： a large-scale Korean screening study

The aim of this study is to assess the ability of serum prostate-specific antigen （PSA） to predict prostate volume （PV） and lower urinary tract symptoms （LUTS） represented by the international prostate symptom score （IPSS）. From January 2001 to December 2011, data were collected from men who first enrolled in the Korean Prostate Health Council Screening Program. Patients with a serum PSA level of 10 ng ml^-1 or age 〈40 years were excluded. Accordingly, a total of 34 857 men were included in our study, and serum PSA, PV and the IPSS were estimated in all patients. Linear and age-adjusted multivariate logistic analyses were used to assess the potential association between PSA and PV or IPSS. The predictive value of PSA for estimating PV and IPSS was assessed based on the receiver operating characteristics-derived area under the curve （AUC）. The mean PV was 29.9 ml, mean PSA level was 1.49 ng ml^-1 and mean IPSS was 15.4. A significant relationship was shown between PSA and PV, and the IPSS and PSA were also significantly correlated after adjusting by age. The AUCs of PSA for predicting PV ~20 ml, 〉25 ml and 〉35 ml were 0.722, 0.728 and 0.779, respectively. The AUCs of PSA for predicting IPSS 〉 7, 〉 13 and 〉 19 were 0. 548, 0.536 and 0. 537, respectively. Serum PSA was a strong predictor of PV in a community-based cohort in a large-scale screening study. Although PSA was also significantly correlated with IPSS, predictive values of PSA for IPSS above the cutoff levels were not excellent. Further investigations are required to elucidate the exact interactions between PSA and LUTS and between PSA and PV in prospective controlled studies. Such studies may suggest how PSA can be used to clinically predict PV and the IPSS.

Intermittent, low-dose, antiandrogen monotherapy as an alternative therapeutic option for patients with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy

The aim of the present study was to determine whether oncologic outcomes and adverse events associated with active on/off intermittent antiandrogen monotherapy （daily bicalutamide, 50 mg per day） are comparable with those of standard external beam radiation therapy （EBRT） or combined androgen blockade （CAB） therapy in prostate cancers with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy. Two hundred twenty-three patients with positive surgical margins post-radical prostatectomy who underwent active surveillance （AS, n = 32）, EBRT without hormone therapy （n = 55）, intermittent antiandrogen monotherapy without EBRT （IAAM, n= 50）, or CAB without EBRT （n = 86）, between 2007 and 2014, were reviewed retrospectively. Pathologic outcomes, biochemical recurrence rates, radiological disease progression, and adverse events were collected from medical records. Biochemical recurrence rates, biochemical recurrence-free survival rates, and radiological recurrence were not different between the groups （P = 0.225, 0.896, and 0.284, respectively）. Adverse event rates and severities were lower for IAAM compared with EBRT or CAB （both P 〈 0.05）, but were comparable to those for AS （P = 0.591 and 0.990, respectively）. Grade ：〉3 adverse events were not reported in the IAAM or AS groups. Erectile dysfunction and loss of libido rates were lower in the IAAM group compared with the EBRT and CAB groups （P = 0.032）. Gastrointestinal complications were more frequently reported in the EBRT group （P = 0.008）. Active on/off IAAM treatment might be an appropriate treatment option for patients with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy. Furthermore, regarding oncologic outcomes, IAAM was comparable to standard EBRT but had a milder adverse event profile.