A Dose-response Meta-analysis of Egg Intake and Breast Cancer Risk

Aim Eggs are one of the most nutritious foods in nature,but there is no unified conclusion about the association between egg intake and breast cancer risk.Methods The PubMed and Web of Science databases for the literature on egg intake and breast cancer risk were searched for papers published during the last 10 years.These were then filtered according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.Stata16.0 software was applied to perform a meta-analysis,the generalized least squares method and constrained cubic spline model were used to assess the dose-response trends between egg intake and breast cancer risk.Results A total of 9 articles were included:6 case control studies and 3 cohort studies.The Newcastle-Ottawa scale(NOS)values of the included articles were all≥6 points.The pooled relative risks(RR)of egg intake and breast cancer risk was 0.91(95%CI:0.69-1.19).The dose-response analysis showed a linear trend for egg intake and breast cancer risk(P=0.689).With every 10 g/day increase in egg intake,the incidence of breast cancer increased by 2%(RR=1.02,95%CI:0.99-1.05).However,these results were not statistically significant.Conclusion This meta-analysis found no significant association between egg intake and breast cancer.

Nutritional Risk Screening with NRS2002 among Hospitalized Cancer Patients in China

Objective The Nutritional Risk Screening 2002(NRS 2002)was used to assess the nutritional risk of hospitalized oncology patients in China.This study explored the factors affecting the risk of nutrition to provide a scientific basis for the assessment and treatment of malnutrition in oncology patients.Methods We used the NRS 2002 to evaluate the nutritional risk in 48,831 hospitalized cancer patients.Descriptive statistical methods were used to describe the general patient information.A Chi-squared test was applied to analyze the relationship between NRS 2002 scores and different demographic characteristics,and the NRS 2002 scores of cancer patients with different characteristics were compared by one-way ANOVA.Results Among 48,831 patients,43.3%were women and 57.7%were men,and 36.5%(17,802)of patients were at risk of nutrition(score≥3).The NRS 2002 score was the highest in leukemia patients(2.93±1.28).A one-way ANOVA revealed that the differences in NRS 2002 scores among patients of different gender,ages,TNM stages,education levels,occupations and areas of residence were statistically significant(P<0.001).Male patients had slightly higher NRS 2002 scores than females(2.33 vs.2.17).The lowest NRS 2002 scores were in patients aged 45-59(2.00±1.26)years and the highest scores were in patients aged≥70(2.76±1.43)years.The NRS 2002 score of patients receiving surgery was the highest(2.45±1.41),and patients receiving surgery plus radiotherapy/chemotherapy was the lowest(2.00±1.26).The risk of nutrition was highest in patients who were farmers(2.34±1.37 scores)and lowest in office staff(2.15±1.32 scores).Patients living in rural areas had the highest risk of nutrition(2.32±1.37 scores).There were significant differences in the NRS 2002 scores for different cancer sub-types for different ethnic groups(P<0.05),except for Zhuang individuals(P=0.124).The risk of nutrition was highest in Uyghur patients(3.35±1.33 scores)and lowest in Mongolians(2.04±1.37 scores).Conclusion More attention should be paid to people at high risk of nutrition,such as elderly patients,patients with a high TNM stage,patients receiving surgical treatment,and patients living in rural areas.Active nutritional interventions should be carried out to improve the nutritional status of malnourished patients.

Oral Contraceptives and Health Outcomes:an Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Women and Offspring

Aim We herein provide an umbrella review of systematic reviews(SR)and meta-analyses(MAs)of studies of the association of oral contraceptives(OCs)with the risks of multiple health outcomes in women and their descendants.Methods Two investigators retrieved publications from four electronic databases,including PubMed,Embase,Web of Science,and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews up to March 15,2021.For each association,random/fixed-effects summary effect size and 95%CIs were estimated.Heterogeneity and publication bias were also assessed.The method quality and evidence level for each publication were respectively assessed utilizing the AMSTAR and GRADE checklists.Results A total of 68 articles with 82 unique outcomes were included based on the eligibility criteria.Numerous lines of evidence indicated that OCs had effects on nearly all cardiovascular disease-related outcomes,especially for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis(OR=7.59,95%CI:3.82-15.09).Harmful associations were also found for vulvar vestibulitis(OR=2.31,95%CI:1.03-5.16),preterm birth(OR=1.17,95%CI:1.07-1.27),miscarriage(OR=1.13,95%CI:1.02-1.72),ulcerative colitis(OR=1.22,95%CI:1.06-1.41),Crohn's disease(OR=1.24,95%CI:1.09-1.40),alveolar osteitis(RR=1.86,95%CI:1.66-2.08),dry socket(RR=1.8,95%CI:1.33-2.43),and interstitial cystitis(OR=2.1,95%CI:1.26-3.49).However,oral contraceptives did not increase the risk of cancer except breast and cervical cancer.Maternal exposure to OCs was linked to an increased risk for the development of respiratory atopic disorders such as asthma(OR=1.1,95%CI:1.02-1.19)and rhinitis(OR=1.34,95%CI:1.07-1.68).Conclusion In summary,although their use obviously reduces the risk of pregnancy-and parturition-related morbidity and mortality for women,OCs were frequently related to more harm than benefit in terms of other health outcomes.This was true for both women and their descendants in this umbrella review.More large-scale prospective studies analysing different doses,structures,and durations of treatment with estrogen and progestin are needed to confirm these effects.