Objective:To establish HPLC fingerprint of Nauclea officinalis stems in different harvesting periods,and analyze the effect of harvest time on the quality of the medicinal materials by combining with chemical pattern ...Objective:To establish HPLC fingerprint of Nauclea officinalis stems in different harvesting periods,and analyze the effect of harvest time on the quality of the medicinal materials by combining with chemical pattern recognition.Methods:The analysis was performed on Sun Fire-C18(150 mm×4.6 mm,5μm)column.The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile-0.1%phosphoric acid solution(gradient elution)at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min.Results:The HPLC fingerprint of Nauclea officinalis stems was established and 12 common peaks were determined,and 3 chromatographic peaks were identified by comparison with the mixed references.There were some differences in the quality of Nauclea officinalis in different harvesting periods.The OPLS-DA analysis successfully predicted four main markers of quality difference.Conclusion:The established HPLC fingerprint could reflect the composition characteristics of Nauclea officinalis stems in different harvesting period,and the main markers that influence the composition difference of the stems could be used as key indicators for the quality control.展开更多
Objective:To rapidly identify the two morphologies and chemical properties of similar herbal medicines,Blumea riparia and B.megacephala as the basis for chemical constituent analysis.Methods:UPLC-Q-Exactive-MS/MS was ...Objective:To rapidly identify the two morphologies and chemical properties of similar herbal medicines,Blumea riparia and B.megacephala as the basis for chemical constituent analysis.Methods:UPLC-Q-Exactive-MS/MS was utilized for profiling and identification of the constituents in B.riparia and B.megacephala.Chemical pattern recognition(CPR)was further used to compare and distinguish the two herbs and to identify their potential characteristic markers.Then,an HPLC method was established for quality evaluation.Results:A total of 93 constituents are identified,including 54 phenolic acids,35 flavonoids,two saccharides,one phenolic acid glycoside,and one other constituent,of which 67 were identified in B.riparia and B.megacephala for the first time.CPR indicates that B.riparia and B.megacephala samples can be distinguished from each other based on the LC–MS data.The isochlorogenic acid A to cryptochlorogenic acid peak area ratio calculated from the HPLC chromatograms was proposed as a differentiation index for distinguishing and quality control of B.riparia and B.megacephala.Conclusion:This study demonstrates significant differences between B.riparia and B.megacephala in terms of chemical composition.The results provide a rapid and simple strategy for the comparison and evaluation of the quality of B.riparia and B.megacephala.展开更多
基金supported by Major Science and Technology Project of Hainan Province(ZDKJ201805)。
文摘Objective:To establish HPLC fingerprint of Nauclea officinalis stems in different harvesting periods,and analyze the effect of harvest time on the quality of the medicinal materials by combining with chemical pattern recognition.Methods:The analysis was performed on Sun Fire-C18(150 mm×4.6 mm,5μm)column.The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile-0.1%phosphoric acid solution(gradient elution)at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min.Results:The HPLC fingerprint of Nauclea officinalis stems was established and 12 common peaks were determined,and 3 chromatographic peaks were identified by comparison with the mixed references.There were some differences in the quality of Nauclea officinalis in different harvesting periods.The OPLS-DA analysis successfully predicted four main markers of quality difference.Conclusion:The established HPLC fingerprint could reflect the composition characteristics of Nauclea officinalis stems in different harvesting period,and the main markers that influence the composition difference of the stems could be used as key indicators for the quality control.
基金supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China(No.2018YFC1706101)The Sichuan Key Research and Development Program(No.2021YFS0043)+1 种基金Leading Talent Support Program of National Civil Commission(2021)Special Fund of Natural Science for the Central Universities(No.2020NQN42).
文摘Objective:To rapidly identify the two morphologies and chemical properties of similar herbal medicines,Blumea riparia and B.megacephala as the basis for chemical constituent analysis.Methods:UPLC-Q-Exactive-MS/MS was utilized for profiling and identification of the constituents in B.riparia and B.megacephala.Chemical pattern recognition(CPR)was further used to compare and distinguish the two herbs and to identify their potential characteristic markers.Then,an HPLC method was established for quality evaluation.Results:A total of 93 constituents are identified,including 54 phenolic acids,35 flavonoids,two saccharides,one phenolic acid glycoside,and one other constituent,of which 67 were identified in B.riparia and B.megacephala for the first time.CPR indicates that B.riparia and B.megacephala samples can be distinguished from each other based on the LC–MS data.The isochlorogenic acid A to cryptochlorogenic acid peak area ratio calculated from the HPLC chromatograms was proposed as a differentiation index for distinguishing and quality control of B.riparia and B.megacephala.Conclusion:This study demonstrates significant differences between B.riparia and B.megacephala in terms of chemical composition.The results provide a rapid and simple strategy for the comparison and evaluation of the quality of B.riparia and B.megacephala.
