数字经济与农业产业的结合正逐渐成为新时代农业现代化的重要趋势。首先,本文在“有为政府 + 有效市场”的新结构经济学框架下,对两个案例村的发展模式进行了比较分析。其次,本文在“演员 + 情境 + 通道”的行动者网络框架中,探讨了“...数字经济与农业产业的结合正逐渐成为新时代农业现代化的重要趋势。首先,本文在“有为政府 + 有效市场”的新结构经济学框架下,对两个案例村的发展模式进行了比较分析。其次,本文在“演员 + 情境 + 通道”的行动者网络框架中,探讨了“乡村精英”在农业产业发展中的行动逻辑,并以贵州省平塘县的两个案例村为例进行说明。研究结果显示,亮寨村与先进村的乡村精英构成相似,但行动者链条存在差异。在较为优越的情境中,创业者更容易识别发展机会;而在较为落后的情境中,村干部的行动则更为有效。本文系统阐述了西部脱贫地区产业发展的关键行动者逻辑,助力“产业兴旺”。The combination of digital economy and agricultural industry is gradually becoming an important trend of agricultural modernization in the new era. Firstly, this paper analyzes the development mode of the two case villages under the new structural economics framework of “active government + effective market”. Secondly, this paper explores the action logic of “village elites” in the development of agricultural industry in the framework of actor + context + channel, and takes two case villages in Pingtang County, Guizhou Province as examples. The results of the study show that the composition of rural elites in Liangzhai Village and Advanced Village is similar, but there are differences in the chain of actors. Entrepreneurs are more likely to recognize development opportunities in more privileged contexts, while village cadres act more effectively in more backward contexts. This paper systematically explains the logic of key actors in the industrial development of impoverished regions in western China to help “industrial prosperity”.展开更多
文摘数字经济与农业产业的结合正逐渐成为新时代农业现代化的重要趋势。首先,本文在“有为政府 + 有效市场”的新结构经济学框架下,对两个案例村的发展模式进行了比较分析。其次,本文在“演员 + 情境 + 通道”的行动者网络框架中,探讨了“乡村精英”在农业产业发展中的行动逻辑,并以贵州省平塘县的两个案例村为例进行说明。研究结果显示,亮寨村与先进村的乡村精英构成相似,但行动者链条存在差异。在较为优越的情境中,创业者更容易识别发展机会;而在较为落后的情境中,村干部的行动则更为有效。本文系统阐述了西部脱贫地区产业发展的关键行动者逻辑,助力“产业兴旺”。The combination of digital economy and agricultural industry is gradually becoming an important trend of agricultural modernization in the new era. Firstly, this paper analyzes the development mode of the two case villages under the new structural economics framework of “active government + effective market”. Secondly, this paper explores the action logic of “village elites” in the development of agricultural industry in the framework of actor + context + channel, and takes two case villages in Pingtang County, Guizhou Province as examples. The results of the study show that the composition of rural elites in Liangzhai Village and Advanced Village is similar, but there are differences in the chain of actors. Entrepreneurs are more likely to recognize development opportunities in more privileged contexts, while village cadres act more effectively in more backward contexts. This paper systematically explains the logic of key actors in the industrial development of impoverished regions in western China to help “industrial prosperity”.
