随着高中数学课程标准的颁布实施,以及新课改下的教研需要,我国目前有五版数学教材在各地使用。现阶段各地根据各地的实际学情选用不同版本教材,其中北师大版的高中数学教材与人教版的高中数学教材在课程设置上有着很大的差异,教学内容...随着高中数学课程标准的颁布实施,以及新课改下的教研需要,我国目前有五版数学教材在各地使用。现阶段各地根据各地的实际学情选用不同版本教材,其中北师大版的高中数学教材与人教版的高中数学教材在课程设置上有着很大的差异,教学内容安排设计和逻辑性是不同的。文章以人民教育出版社高中《数学1 (必修) A版》、北京师范大学出版社高中《数学1 (必修)》教科书函数的奇偶性这一节内容为研究对象,从教材编写理念、教材内容安排、以及对学生的要求这三个方面来比较分析。通过对比分析,得出这两版教材在编写理念、教材内容安排和对学生要求上的相同点和不同点。With the promulgation and implementation of the high school mathematics curriculum standards, as well as the needs of teaching and research under the new curriculum reform, there are currently five versions of mathematics textbooks being used in various regions of China. At this stage, different regions select different versions of textbooks based on their actual learning situations. Among them, the high school mathematics textbooks of Beijing Normal University Press (BNUP) and People’s Education Press (PEP) differ significantly in curriculum design, instructional content arrangement, and logical organization. This article takes the section on the parity of functions from PEP’s “Mathematics 1 (Compulsory) A Version” and BNUP’s “Mathematics 1 (Compulsory)” textbooks for high school students as the research object. It conducts a comparative analysis from three aspects: textbook compilation concepts, content arrangement, and requirements for students. Through the comparative analysis, similarities and differences between these two versions of textbooks in terms of compilation concepts, content arrangement, and student requirements are identified.展开更多
文摘随着高中数学课程标准的颁布实施,以及新课改下的教研需要,我国目前有五版数学教材在各地使用。现阶段各地根据各地的实际学情选用不同版本教材,其中北师大版的高中数学教材与人教版的高中数学教材在课程设置上有着很大的差异,教学内容安排设计和逻辑性是不同的。文章以人民教育出版社高中《数学1 (必修) A版》、北京师范大学出版社高中《数学1 (必修)》教科书函数的奇偶性这一节内容为研究对象,从教材编写理念、教材内容安排、以及对学生的要求这三个方面来比较分析。通过对比分析,得出这两版教材在编写理念、教材内容安排和对学生要求上的相同点和不同点。With the promulgation and implementation of the high school mathematics curriculum standards, as well as the needs of teaching and research under the new curriculum reform, there are currently five versions of mathematics textbooks being used in various regions of China. At this stage, different regions select different versions of textbooks based on their actual learning situations. Among them, the high school mathematics textbooks of Beijing Normal University Press (BNUP) and People’s Education Press (PEP) differ significantly in curriculum design, instructional content arrangement, and logical organization. This article takes the section on the parity of functions from PEP’s “Mathematics 1 (Compulsory) A Version” and BNUP’s “Mathematics 1 (Compulsory)” textbooks for high school students as the research object. It conducts a comparative analysis from three aspects: textbook compilation concepts, content arrangement, and requirements for students. Through the comparative analysis, similarities and differences between these two versions of textbooks in terms of compilation concepts, content arrangement, and student requirements are identified.
