《刑法修正案(十一)》对挪用资金罪的修改幅度较高,表明国家对挪用资金罪所保护法益“民营企业的财产”的重视,以及对加强企业产权保护和优化营商环境的决心,同时也对司法机关提出了针对挪用资金罪谨慎、精准入罪的潜在要求。文章基于...《刑法修正案(十一)》对挪用资金罪的修改幅度较高,表明国家对挪用资金罪所保护法益“民营企业的财产”的重视,以及对加强企业产权保护和优化营商环境的决心,同时也对司法机关提出了针对挪用资金罪谨慎、精准入罪的潜在要求。文章基于“二元相对”的思维模式阐述了出罪研究对于犯罪认定的必要性。并且梳理了立法层面(刑民衔接增设前置法、向结果犯转化、积极适用刑事和解制度)和司法层面(构成要件限缩解释、违法性阻却、有责性阻却、不可罚性阻却)的具体出罪路径和理论。The high degree of amendment to the Criminal Law (XI) on the crime of misappropriation of funds shows that the state attaches great importance to the crime of misappropriation of funds to protect the “property of private enterprises”, as well as the determination to strengthen the protection of enterprise property rights and optimize the business environment, and also puts forward potential requirements for the judicial organs to be cautious and precise in the crime of misappropriation of funds. Based on the “dualistic relative” mode of thinking, this paper expounds the necessity of crime research for crime identification. Moreover, the paper analyzes the concrete ways and theories of crime from the legislative level (adding the advance law, transforming to the result crime, actively applying the criminal reconciliation system) and the judicial level (constraining the interpretation of constitutive elements, preventing illegality, preventing responsibility, preventing unpunished).展开更多
文摘《刑法修正案(十一)》对挪用资金罪的修改幅度较高,表明国家对挪用资金罪所保护法益“民营企业的财产”的重视,以及对加强企业产权保护和优化营商环境的决心,同时也对司法机关提出了针对挪用资金罪谨慎、精准入罪的潜在要求。文章基于“二元相对”的思维模式阐述了出罪研究对于犯罪认定的必要性。并且梳理了立法层面(刑民衔接增设前置法、向结果犯转化、积极适用刑事和解制度)和司法层面(构成要件限缩解释、违法性阻却、有责性阻却、不可罚性阻却)的具体出罪路径和理论。The high degree of amendment to the Criminal Law (XI) on the crime of misappropriation of funds shows that the state attaches great importance to the crime of misappropriation of funds to protect the “property of private enterprises”, as well as the determination to strengthen the protection of enterprise property rights and optimize the business environment, and also puts forward potential requirements for the judicial organs to be cautious and precise in the crime of misappropriation of funds. Based on the “dualistic relative” mode of thinking, this paper expounds the necessity of crime research for crime identification. Moreover, the paper analyzes the concrete ways and theories of crime from the legislative level (adding the advance law, transforming to the result crime, actively applying the criminal reconciliation system) and the judicial level (constraining the interpretation of constitutive elements, preventing illegality, preventing responsibility, preventing unpunished).
