本文以审判为视角,通过田野调查的方法,根据扎根理论构建了审判人员理解和应用绿色原则的理论模型。本文根据绿色原则在合同纠纷处理中的指导意义,通过裁判文书网检索相关案例,发现不同类型合同纠纷中绿色原则的适用和理解存在差异,部...本文以审判为视角,通过田野调查的方法,根据扎根理论构建了审判人员理解和应用绿色原则的理论模型。本文根据绿色原则在合同纠纷处理中的指导意义,通过裁判文书网检索相关案例,发现不同类型合同纠纷中绿色原则的适用和理解存在差异,部分法院对绿色原则的理解不够充分和完备。绿色原则在司法审判中发挥了重要作用,但也受到司法诉讼机制、社会政策因素、法官自由裁量等多方面因素的影响。本文通过技术合同纠纷、运输合同纠纷、承揽合同纠纷和借款合同纠纷四个方面的样本分析,探讨了不同类型合同纠纷中绿色原则的适用和理解。本文通过质性研究,深入分析了审判人员对绿色原则的实践理解和适用情况。This article adopts a judicial perspective and constructs a theoretical model for judges to understand and apply green principles based on field investigations rooted in theory. According to the guiding significance of the green principle in the handling of contract disputes, by examining relevant cases retrieved from judicial databases, the article explores the application and interpretation differences of green principles in various types of contractual disputes, highlighting that some courts do not fully grasp the green principles comprehensively. Green principles play a significant role in judicial adjudication but are influenced by various factors such as judicial litigation mechanisms, social policies, and judicial discretion. The article conducts sample analyses on technological contract disputes, transportation contract disputes, service contract disputes, and loan contract disputes to explore the application and interpretation of green principles in different types of contractual disputes. This article conducts a qualitative study to deeply analyze the practical understanding and application of the green principle by judicial personnel.展开更多
文摘本文以审判为视角,通过田野调查的方法,根据扎根理论构建了审判人员理解和应用绿色原则的理论模型。本文根据绿色原则在合同纠纷处理中的指导意义,通过裁判文书网检索相关案例,发现不同类型合同纠纷中绿色原则的适用和理解存在差异,部分法院对绿色原则的理解不够充分和完备。绿色原则在司法审判中发挥了重要作用,但也受到司法诉讼机制、社会政策因素、法官自由裁量等多方面因素的影响。本文通过技术合同纠纷、运输合同纠纷、承揽合同纠纷和借款合同纠纷四个方面的样本分析,探讨了不同类型合同纠纷中绿色原则的适用和理解。本文通过质性研究,深入分析了审判人员对绿色原则的实践理解和适用情况。This article adopts a judicial perspective and constructs a theoretical model for judges to understand and apply green principles based on field investigations rooted in theory. According to the guiding significance of the green principle in the handling of contract disputes, by examining relevant cases retrieved from judicial databases, the article explores the application and interpretation differences of green principles in various types of contractual disputes, highlighting that some courts do not fully grasp the green principles comprehensively. Green principles play a significant role in judicial adjudication but are influenced by various factors such as judicial litigation mechanisms, social policies, and judicial discretion. The article conducts sample analyses on technological contract disputes, transportation contract disputes, service contract disputes, and loan contract disputes to explore the application and interpretation of green principles in different types of contractual disputes. This article conducts a qualitative study to deeply analyze the practical understanding and application of the green principle by judicial personnel.
