本文采用话语历史分析方法,选取华为投资控股有限公司2019~2023年度报告中的领导层致辞作为研究语料,构建小型语料库,借助语料库分析软件Lancsbox V6.0,分析华为企业身份建构的话语策略及其语言实现方式。研究发现,华为采用命名策略、...本文采用话语历史分析方法,选取华为投资控股有限公司2019~2023年度报告中的领导层致辞作为研究语料,构建小型语料库,借助语料库分析软件Lancsbox V6.0,分析华为企业身份建构的话语策略及其语言实现方式。研究发现,华为采用命名策略、述谓策略、视角化策略和强化/弱化策略来建构企业身份,向公众传递出积极正能量、负责任的亲民形象。致力于为话语历史分析与企业身份建构的深入研究提供借鉴。From the perspective of Discourse-Historical Approach, this paper uses messages from the leadership of Huawei in 2019~2023 corporate annual reports as a small corpus, and investigates the discursive strategies and its linguistic realizations adopted by Huawei in the construction of corporate identity with the help of corpus analysis software Lancsbox V6.0. The results show that Huawei adopts strategies of nomination, predication, perspectivization as well as intensification and mitigation to portray itself as a friendly, positive and responsible corporate. And this research is dedicated to provide implications for further analysis of Discourse-Historical Approach and discursive construction of other corporate identities.展开更多
本文旨在运用Cap的趋近化理论,探讨刑事庭审中公诉人的话语策略。本文以张扣扣一案为语料,通过使用UAM corpus tool 3对语料进行人工标注,统计出公诉人话语的趋近化策略。研究发现:公诉人使用了三种趋近化策略,分别为空间、时间、价值...本文旨在运用Cap的趋近化理论,探讨刑事庭审中公诉人的话语策略。本文以张扣扣一案为语料,通过使用UAM corpus tool 3对语料进行人工标注,统计出公诉人话语的趋近化策略。研究发现:公诉人使用了三种趋近化策略,分别为空间、时间、价值趋近策略;三种趋近化策略在使用上存在不同的倾向性,其中,空间趋近的使用频次最高,在证明被告人犯罪事实方面起到了直接作用,其次是价值趋近,最低的是时间趋近;公诉人通过采用这三种趋近策略,构建了话语空间外部实体与话语空间内部实体之间的敌对性,强化话语空间外部实体的非法性,唤起外部逼近的威胁以寻求防御,进而合法化严惩被告人犯罪行为的举措。This study aims to apply Cap’s Proximization Theory to explore the discourse strategies of the prosecutor in criminal trials. Taking the case of Zhang Koukou as an example, this study manually annotated the corpus using UAM corpus tool 3 to analyze the proximization strategies employed by the prosecutor. The study reveals that the prosecutor uses three proximization strategies, namely spatial, temporal, and axiological proximization strategies. These strategies show different tendencies in usage: among which spatial proximization is the most frequently used, playing a direct role in proving the facts of the defendant’s crime, followed by axiological proximization, and temporal proximization. By employing these three strategies, the prosecutor constructs hostility between entities outside the deictic center and those inside the deictic center, strengthens the illegality of entities outside the deictic center, awakens external threats to seek defense, and thus legitimizes measures to severely punish the defendant’s criminal behavior.展开更多
社交媒体成为了公众表达和沟通的重要平台,为弱势群体提供了现实之外的合法化互动空间。本研究聚焦于微博超话中抑郁症群体的764条话语表达,通过定量与定性相结合的研究方法,探究抑郁症患者在互动视角下所采用的合法化话语策略。研究发...社交媒体成为了公众表达和沟通的重要平台,为弱势群体提供了现实之外的合法化互动空间。本研究聚焦于微博超话中抑郁症群体的764条话语表达,通过定量与定性相结合的研究方法,探究抑郁症患者在互动视角下所采用的合法化话语策略。研究发现,抑郁症患者话语具有重视家庭关系、强调症状描述和情绪表达强烈的特点,而且患者借助多种话语策略进行自我合法化,包括情感倾诉、症状描述、经历分享等方式,争取他人的认同与支持,揭示了患者如何通过话语策略影响他人的观点和态度,进一步促进患者群体的社会接纳和合法化。研究有助于增进公众对抑郁症的理解,减少对抑郁症群体的歧视和偏见,以及为抑郁症患者提供更精准的心理支持。Social media has become an important platform for public expression and communication, providing marginalized groups with a legitimate interactive space beyond reality. This study focuses on 764 discourse expressions of the depression group in Weibo Hypertext, and explores the legitimization discourse strategies adopted by depression patients from an interactive perspective through a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods. Research has found that the discourse of patients with depression has the characteristics of valuing family relationships, emphasizing symptom description, and strongly expressing emotions. Patients use various discourse strategies to self legitimize, including emotional confession, symptom description, experience sharing, etc., to gain recognition and support from others. This reveals how patients influence others’ views and attitudes through discourse strategies, further promoting social acceptance and legitimization of the patient group. Research can help enhance public understanding of depression, reduce discrimination and bias against individuals with depression, and provide more precise psychological support for patients with depression.展开更多
文摘本文采用话语历史分析方法,选取华为投资控股有限公司2019~2023年度报告中的领导层致辞作为研究语料,构建小型语料库,借助语料库分析软件Lancsbox V6.0,分析华为企业身份建构的话语策略及其语言实现方式。研究发现,华为采用命名策略、述谓策略、视角化策略和强化/弱化策略来建构企业身份,向公众传递出积极正能量、负责任的亲民形象。致力于为话语历史分析与企业身份建构的深入研究提供借鉴。From the perspective of Discourse-Historical Approach, this paper uses messages from the leadership of Huawei in 2019~2023 corporate annual reports as a small corpus, and investigates the discursive strategies and its linguistic realizations adopted by Huawei in the construction of corporate identity with the help of corpus analysis software Lancsbox V6.0. The results show that Huawei adopts strategies of nomination, predication, perspectivization as well as intensification and mitigation to portray itself as a friendly, positive and responsible corporate. And this research is dedicated to provide implications for further analysis of Discourse-Historical Approach and discursive construction of other corporate identities.
文摘本文旨在运用Cap的趋近化理论,探讨刑事庭审中公诉人的话语策略。本文以张扣扣一案为语料,通过使用UAM corpus tool 3对语料进行人工标注,统计出公诉人话语的趋近化策略。研究发现:公诉人使用了三种趋近化策略,分别为空间、时间、价值趋近策略;三种趋近化策略在使用上存在不同的倾向性,其中,空间趋近的使用频次最高,在证明被告人犯罪事实方面起到了直接作用,其次是价值趋近,最低的是时间趋近;公诉人通过采用这三种趋近策略,构建了话语空间外部实体与话语空间内部实体之间的敌对性,强化话语空间外部实体的非法性,唤起外部逼近的威胁以寻求防御,进而合法化严惩被告人犯罪行为的举措。This study aims to apply Cap’s Proximization Theory to explore the discourse strategies of the prosecutor in criminal trials. Taking the case of Zhang Koukou as an example, this study manually annotated the corpus using UAM corpus tool 3 to analyze the proximization strategies employed by the prosecutor. The study reveals that the prosecutor uses three proximization strategies, namely spatial, temporal, and axiological proximization strategies. These strategies show different tendencies in usage: among which spatial proximization is the most frequently used, playing a direct role in proving the facts of the defendant’s crime, followed by axiological proximization, and temporal proximization. By employing these three strategies, the prosecutor constructs hostility between entities outside the deictic center and those inside the deictic center, strengthens the illegality of entities outside the deictic center, awakens external threats to seek defense, and thus legitimizes measures to severely punish the defendant’s criminal behavior.
文摘社交媒体成为了公众表达和沟通的重要平台,为弱势群体提供了现实之外的合法化互动空间。本研究聚焦于微博超话中抑郁症群体的764条话语表达,通过定量与定性相结合的研究方法,探究抑郁症患者在互动视角下所采用的合法化话语策略。研究发现,抑郁症患者话语具有重视家庭关系、强调症状描述和情绪表达强烈的特点,而且患者借助多种话语策略进行自我合法化,包括情感倾诉、症状描述、经历分享等方式,争取他人的认同与支持,揭示了患者如何通过话语策略影响他人的观点和态度,进一步促进患者群体的社会接纳和合法化。研究有助于增进公众对抑郁症的理解,减少对抑郁症群体的歧视和偏见,以及为抑郁症患者提供更精准的心理支持。Social media has become an important platform for public expression and communication, providing marginalized groups with a legitimate interactive space beyond reality. This study focuses on 764 discourse expressions of the depression group in Weibo Hypertext, and explores the legitimization discourse strategies adopted by depression patients from an interactive perspective through a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods. Research has found that the discourse of patients with depression has the characteristics of valuing family relationships, emphasizing symptom description, and strongly expressing emotions. Patients use various discourse strategies to self legitimize, including emotional confession, symptom description, experience sharing, etc., to gain recognition and support from others. This reveals how patients influence others’ views and attitudes through discourse strategies, further promoting social acceptance and legitimization of the patient group. Research can help enhance public understanding of depression, reduce discrimination and bias against individuals with depression, and provide more precise psychological support for patients with depression.
